Skip to main content
Search
< All Topics
Print

Evelyn Boulet

Updated
ByEpsteinWiki
Views3

Snapshot

Field Documentary detail
Name indexed Evelyn Boulet
Reviewed handwritten-log window January and April 2003; the earlier indexed date conflicts with the log
Primary evidence EFTA02846460, page 98; pages 100–101
Verification requirement Separate the written name, the indexed date and any independently established identity

The name read as Evelyn Boulet appears in a released handwritten flight log on two April 10, 2003 entries: LFPB to CYQX and CYQX to PBI. A separate January 2003 entry also contains the name, but its date conflicts with derivative indexes. These are records of a written name; they do not independently establish a biography, occupation, family relationship or wrongdoing. January row; April rows.

Key Takeaways

  • The earlier index date is disputed: the handwritten log places the relevant TIST–PBI row in January 2003, while derivative indexes give different dates.
  • Two released copies of a February 2003 bank statement visibly use Evelyne Boulet; the cited travel-agency ledger was not verified in this review.
  • The bank pages reproduce one statement entry, not two separate payments. Similar spellings do not establish that the bank entry and flight-log name identify the same person.

What the Documents Reveal

On page 100 of EFTA02846460, the April 10, 2003 row is numbered 192 and records LFPB to CYQX. The name is legible as Evelyn Boulet in the remarks column. Page 101 continues on the same date with flight 193, CYQX to PBI, and again records the name. These are the original codes behind the index’s LBG–YQX and YQX–PBI route labels. The aircraft identification-mark column records N908JE. That is a log notation, not a separately checked registration history or proof of anyone’s purpose for travel.

Different given names and spellings must remain distinct unless additional evidence connects them. No independent passenger-identification record reviewed here links the flight-log name to the bank beneficiary. No family relationship, modeling occupation or connection to a modeling business is inferred from the surname.

The earlier TIST–PBI row is on page 98, beneath a new 2003 year notation; its day reads as “2 JAN”. The same visible date appears in the previously retrieved DOJ copy. Epstein Data’s 2002 index file labels the matching name-and-route entry January 1, 2002, while a separately retrieved Carstensen index labels it January 1, 2003. The handwritten row is reported as January 2003, with the apparent day and the conflicting index dates stated rather than silently reconciled.

The Primary Flight Log and Its Limits

EFTA02846460 is a released copy of a handwritten aviation log. Its first page carries a Government Exhibit 662-RR label and a separate notice that it was publicly released in U.S. v. Maxwell. These markings describe the exhibit and release; they do not turn each passenger entry into a judicial finding. A log can record dates, routes, an aircraft identification mark and names or initials written by its keeper. It does not independently identify every traveler, establish that listed people met, or show shared knowledge, intent or wrongdoing. Redacted entries remain redacted.

Researchers should distinguish the first historical log entry from its later reproduction as a spreadsheet, court exhibit, OCR transcription or online index. These can all refer to one journey. Counting each repetition as independent confirmation creates a false sense of corroboration.

Flight Entries Compared with the Handwritten Log

Epstein Data’s flight finding aid supplies three relevant entries in its reviewed 2002 and 2003 data files. The table below uses the handwritten-log dates, retains the index’s route labels and supplies the original codes in the verification column. The earlier derivative date conflict is explained alongside the row. The two April rows have also been compared with the primary page images. This is a scoped comparison of those files and rows, not a complete inventory of every journey or every released record.

The index labels these rows with both “primary” and “carstensen”, but its linked-document entries point to the Carstensen finding aid rather than a specific primary page. Those labels are not independent corroboration by themselves. The verification column below identifies the handwritten pages actually inspected. Index copies, transcriptions and later reproductions can describe the same underlying journey.

Handwritten-log date Airport codes Handwritten-log comparison and verification limit
2003-01-02 (handwritten “2 JAN”) STT to PBI PDF page 98 records TIST–PBI under January 2003, with the day read as “2 JAN”, and a visible Evelyn Boulet entry. The index date of January 1, 2002 conflicts with the log; the separately retrieved Carstensen index instead gives January 1, 2003. N909JE is a log notation, not independently verified registration.
2003-04-10 LBG to YQX PDF page 100, flight 192: original codes LFPB–CYQX; Evelyn Boulet is visibly written; N908JE appears in the identification-mark column.
2003-04-10 YQX to PBI PDF page 101, flight 193: original codes CYQX–PBI; Evelyn Boulet is again visibly written; N908JE appears in the identification-mark column.

Evelyne Boulet in the Financial Record

A February 2003 JPMorgan statement, PDF page 3, records a February 27 book-transfer debit of $2,500 and visibly prints Evelyne Boulet in the beneficiary line. The other released copy, also PDF page 3, reproduces the same printed statement page 6 of 8 and production identifier JPM-SDNY-00003498. These are two copies of one recorded debit, not two payments. The statement entry does not establish final receipt, the purpose of the transfer or an identity match to the flight-log name.

The Shoppers Travel ledger remains a separate citation requiring source-level verification. Invoice counts, name spellings and dates from that ledger are not treated as verified findings in this review. In any event, an accounting date cannot automatically establish the date of a private flight.

The statement spelling Evelyne and the handwritten flight-log spelling read as Evelyn are reported separately. Similarity alone does not establish that the occurrences belong to one person. Neither the name nor the recorded debit establishes an occupation, a family relationship or the reason for the transfer.

Questions and Unresolved Issues

  • Can an independent, lawfully available record identify the person behind the written flight-log name?
  • What explains the January day and year differences between the handwritten log and derivative indexes?
  • Does any independent evidence connect the bank-statement beneficiary to the flight-log entry?
  • Can the travel-agency citation be verified without conflating invoices, actual travel and identity?

Related EpsteinWiki Articles

Epstein Data Wiki Context

The Maxwell Trial Exhibits page distinguishes exhibit labels from later release markings. The David Rodgers page discusses the log’s custodian, and Epstein’s Flight Department distinguishes record-keeping practice from aircraft-registration history. These are secondary context pages, not independent passenger-identification evidence. No dedicated Boulet article was found in the bounded Wiki-directory and exact-name searches used for this review; that does not establish absence from the wider corpus.

Sources

Posted
ByEpsteinWiki
Tags:
Previous Epstein Exposed Flight Log Database
Next Fabriame Palheo
Table of Contents