EFTA00786704: September 2018 Device Messages and Proposed Meetings
Snapshot
| Record | EFTA00786704, an 18-page PDF reproduction of a device-message export. |
|---|---|
| Displayed date and time | The visible messages run from September 18, 2018, at 13:54:49 UTC to 20:15:33 UTC that day. |
| Printed identifiers | EFTA00786704 through EFTA00786721. These are 18 consecutive page stamps in one PDF, not 18 separate documents. |
| Export scope | The opening screen labels this segment Messages 8401–8500 of 32198 and identifies device NYC024362.aff4, evidence ID NYC024362.aff4 – 001. The segment includes repeated representations of messages. |
| Subjects | Scheduling and proposed visits, New York during UNGA week, personal and service-related exchanges, shared media and source-file notes. |
| Attribution and limits | The export uses the label Self for one account and redacts many other identifying fields. Its contents establish what the rendered messages say; they do not independently verify the account operator, proposed events or claims about other people. |
Key Takeaways
- The 18-page record is one numbered segment of a larger message export. It is not the full 32,198-item collection or a complete conversation with one correspondent.
- The UNGA-week exchange urges a redacted correspondent to prioritize New York over European plans. References to possible contacts are the sender’s representations, not proof that meetings occurred.
- The proposed early-October visit remains a proposal in these pages. The record does not establish the visitor’s identity, age, purpose, arrangements or eventual attendance.
- Repeated timestamps and message bodies appear with different bracketed source numbers. The closing notes tie those numbers to chat.db and archived chat files, so repeated rows must not be counted as independent confirmations.
- The shared text about Daniels and Trump concerns allegations attributed to Daniels about Trump. It is not a description of Epstein and is not independently substantiated by its appearance in a message.
- The redactions and partial contact labels leave important attribution questions unresolved. No name should be supplied for a blacked-out field from this record alone.
What the document is
EFTA00786704 reproduces a case-data interface headed Messages. The navigation lists device details, calendar items, calls, contacts, messages, top contacts and user accounts. The device is labeled NYC024362.aff4, with evidence ID NYC024362.aff4 – 001. The displayed message range is 8401–8500 of 32198. These labels describe the export’s organization; the PDF does not contain all of the underlying device data.
The message bodies begin at 13:54:49 UTC on September 18, 2018. The last visible message is timed 20:15:33 UTC on the same date. Most entries are labeled iMessage; one repeated exchange is labeled SMS. Chronological order interleaves several correspondents, so neighboring entries do not necessarily belong to one conversation.
The sender fields identify one account as Self. Other fields show short contact labels, a displayed full name or blacked-out names and contact details. A device’s contact label does not independently authenticate the person using an account. This article retains Self as the source’s attribution and does not identify redacted correspondents.
The closing source notes identify a Macintosh HD volume, an Apple Messages chat.db file and several archived .ichat files. The PDF itself supplies no examiner’s declaration, acquisition date, device-ownership finding or complete chain-of-custody narrative. It should therefore be read as the rendered record supplied, with those provenance limits.
Scheduling and proposed visits
The exchange on pages 3 and 4 asks when a correspondent will return from Europe. A reply gives September 28; subsequent messages include an abbreviated reference alongside September 28 or 29, Saturday September 29 and New York. The response from Self indicates an intention to arrange something, followed by thanks. The initials are not expanded in the file, and these messages do not establish a completed appointment or identify everyone expected to attend.
The separate exchange on pages 6 and 7 proposes bringing a correspondent’s California friend for a visit. The reply suggests a few days at the beginning of October and says the writer will speak to the friend, provide dates and discuss her in person beforehand. The visible record stops short of an itinerary, booking, payment or confirmation that the visit occurred. It provides no basis to infer the proposed visitor’s age, occupation or reason for visiting.
The adjacent service request concerns a haircut and receives an affirmative response referring to Lesley, followed by thanks on page 8. This is evidence of the request and response, not an appointment or service-completion record. Lesley is only a first-name reference here.
The New York and UNGA-week exchange
The message at 17:44:43 UTC advises a redacted correspondent to be in New York during UNGA week despite European plans. Self mentions an intention to travel to Europe on the 30th and represents that people referred to as miro and Terje will be in New York, alongside foreign ministers. The reply on page 9 says the correspondent is committed to events in Italy and the Czech Republic and is working on the situation.
The later messages continue to press the case for New York and refer broadly to Davos, China and Middle Eastern contacts. These categories are the sender’s description of a networking opportunity. They are not an attendee list, an official invitation or evidence that the people described agreed to meet the recipient.
The correspondent’s objection asks whether meetings during UNGA week are for government officials. The reply from Self argues that the people concerned are there to meet nongovernment contacts, followed by a short acknowledgment. A later sports comparison portrays New York as more important than the correspondent’s European plans. The sequence records persuasion and proposed access; it does not show that the correspondent changed plans or attended any meeting.
The record’s abbreviated references do not establish full identities for the people discussed. Nor does the file verify Self’s statements about those people’s whereabouts, availability or intentions. Those claims remain attributed to the message sender.
Shared media and other exchanges
The copied passage on page 2 discusses a book by Daniels and attributes an intimate description of Trump to her. Self then comments on how Trump might react. The passage is reproduced in two source-labeled entries. Its presence documents the circulation of that text, not the truth of the underlying allegation. It concerns Trump rather than Epstein and should not be used as anatomical evidence about Epstein.
The related review of anatomical evidence treats this document as a source requiring that distinction. This catalogue covers the whole export segment rather than repeating that article’s separate witness, deposition and medical-record analysis.
The remaining messages include a reference to Skype, a reaction to another message, brief check-ins and scheduling. A health-related availability inquiry and reply appears across pages 8–10; the exchange does not establish examination or treatment. Other messages report travel and attempted contact and discuss a proposed time to speak. These are statements by correspondents, not independently verified movements or meetings.
The SMS entry addressed to Leon sets out an order of work: gather and check facts from originals, calculate, then prepare a presentation. The record supplies no project title or supporting work product, and the first name alone does not establish a full identity.
The Forbes link appears in a message on page 15 and is repeated on page 16. It concerns a networking experience becoming a business. Page 16 also shows two failed image placeholders, which do not reveal the missing images’ contents, followed by personal commentary about an unnamed person’s appearance. The final exchange contains a religious-observance question and a sexual remark. Neither establishes the underlying personal conduct, religion or health of anyone discussed.
Evidence Appearances
The complete PDF contains the following 18 pages. The printed EFTA stamps identify pages within this one file. Topic descriptions below do not treat repeated source representations as additional communications.
| Evidence ID | PDF page | Contents and significance |
|---|---|---|
| EFTA00786704 | 1 | Opening navigation, device and evidence labels, message range 8401–8500 of 32198; messages beginning at 13:54:49 UTC and a later countdown. Repeated source-labeled entries are visible. |
| EFTA00786705 | 2 | Copied text attributing an intimate description of Trump to Daniels, Self’s reaction and the start of a correspondent’s brief response. The allegation is quoted material, not a finding. |
| EFTA00786706 | 3 | Continuation of the response; question about returning from Europe, September 28 reply and a scheduling question using initials. No completed meeting is established. |
| EFTA00786707 | 4 | September 29 and New York scheduling; an indication that arrangements will be made; start of a thank-you message. |
| EFTA00786708 | 5 | Continuation of thanks, a brief personal comment, a reference to Skype and a reaction to a Florida/home-Sunday message. The surrounding conversations are incomplete. |
| EFTA00786709 | 6 | Proposed visit by a California friend, a suggested early-October period and the beginning of an acknowledgment. The visit remains prospective. |
| EFTA00786710 | 7 | Continuation of the acknowledgment; promise to discuss the friend and dates; haircut request; beginning of Self’s affirmative reply referring to Lesley. |
| EFTA00786711 | 8 | Continuation of the service exchange; health-related availability question; first UNGA-week message proposing New York over European plans. |
| EFTA00786712 | 9 | Repeated UNGA-week message, reply about commitments in Italy and the Czech Republic, acknowledgment and the beginning of an availability response in another exchange. |
| EFTA00786713 | 10 | Continuation of the availability response; further promotion of New York and broad contact references; separate personal check-in. |
| EFTA00786714 | 11 | Brief reply, question about nongovernment meetings during UNGA week, report of travel toward Newark and start of a message about mobile coverage. |
| EFTA00786715 | 12 | Continuation of the coverage message; Self’s response about nongovernment contacts; acknowledgment; start of a reported flight coincidence. |
| EFTA00786716 | 13 | Continuation of the flight account; SMS to Leon about checking facts, calculation and presentation; greetings and the beginning of Self’s response. The SMS appears twice; separate iMessage greetings share its timestamp and also appear twice. |
| EFTA00786717 | 14 | Continuation of Self’s response; sports analogy in the New York/Europe discussion; entries without visible body text; beginning of a proposed time to talk. |
| EFTA00786718 | 15 | Continuation of the proposed time to talk and a possible visit; report of boarding and unsuccessful calls; Forbes link and start of repeated link-related records. |
| EFTA00786719 | 16 | Two failed image placeholders and the repeated Forbes link; personal speculation about an unnamed person’s appearance and Self’s short reaction. The missing images cannot be reconstructed from this page. |
| EFTA00786720 | 17 | Final question and sexual remark, ending at 20:15:33 UTC; source notes for bracketed references 1–6 and the beginning of reference 7. Notes identify the database and archived chat files. |
| EFTA00786721 | 18 | Continuation of source reference 7, references 8 and 9, and navigation labels for message ranges 8301–8400 and 8501–8600. Those neighboring segments are not included in this PDF. |
Repeated records and source notes
The numbered notes connect bracketed reference 2 to chat.db, while references 1 and 3–9 point to archived .ichat files. Many entries repeat the same timestamp and message body under reference 2 and an archive reference. That structure supports treating them as parallel representations of a message, not separate send events or independent witnesses.
The export’s range label is a position within a larger collection. It should not be described as 100 unique communications or 100 independent conversations. Different record representations, repeated link entries and missing image content prevent a unique-message count from being inferred merely by subtracting the displayed range endpoints.
The source-file notes include archive names and dates different from the displayed message times. Those labels should not be substituted for the message date. The PDF does not explain every export convention or demonstrate the completeness of any individual thread. The navigation on the final page points to neighboring ranges, but their underlying messages are outside this file.
Redactions and evidentiary limits
The displayed redactions obscure names, contact details and some message text. They must be respected across the message fields and the source notes. Full email addresses, local user paths and unnecessary personal details are omitted from this account. A short contact label, first name, initial or proposed location cannot safely resolve a redacted identity.
The complete record contains no sworn testimony, judicial finding, travel manifest or independent confirmation of the proposed meetings and visits. Mentions of a person do not establish participation in misconduct. The medical, appearance-related, sexual and copied-media remarks are statements in correspondence, not verified diagnoses or findings about another person.
The source used here is the PDF already attached to this article in EpsteinWiki’s media library. Its page stamps and contents are visible, but the file supplies no release cover sheet or complete collection history. This account does not claim an independently verified match to an official government-hosted copy.
Sources
- EFTA00786704, site-hosted 18-page PDF. Device-message export segment labeled Messages 8401–8500 of 32198; displayed messages dated September 18, 2018; printed page stamps EFTA00786704 through EFTA00786721. Original attachment retained.