Skip to main content
< All Topics
Print

Château du Marais: The €70 Million French Estate Offered to Jeffrey Epstein

On June 26, 2018, Paris based interior designer Jean Huguen forwarded Jeffrey Epstein a sales approach for Château du Marais, a historic estate southwest of Paris. Huguen summarized it in three short lines: “A castle to sell,” “70 MO€,” and “The price is high but they need money.” The forwarded French messages said the announced price was €70 million, that the sellers were open to discussion, and that a complex co-ownership arrangement made the price highly negotiable.

The 24 page brochure released as EFTA00800058 appears to be the property presentation referenced by that email. It describes a 100 hectare estate with a Louis XVI style château, extensive outbuildings, stables, a chapel, a former mill, historic dungeons, and a 550 meter reflecting pool. The email that supplies the missing context is EFTA00902255.

The records support a significant but limited conclusion. Epstein personally received a direct sales pitch for the property while other contemporaneous messages strongly place him in Paris. The released records reviewed for this article do not show that he visited Château du Marais, requested a tour, made an offer, ordered due diligence, transferred money, or acquired an interest in it. A later reported sale to Daniel Křetínský and Jiří Šmejc in 2022 confirms that the estate ultimately went to different buyers.


Snapshot

FieldFinding
Primary evidenceEFTA00800058
Context emailEFTA00902255
PropertyChâteau du Marais
LocationLe Val-Saint-Germain, Essonne, France
Distance stated in brochure50 kilometers south of Paris, southeast of Versailles
Date sent to EpsteinJune 26, 2018
Immediate senderJean Huguen
Earlier sendersPhilippe Mugnier and Victoire de Pourtalès
Announced asking price€70 million
NegotiabilityThe forwarded messages expressly said the sellers were open to discussion and described the price as highly negotiable
Brochure length24 PDF pages, Bates EFTA00800058 through EFTA00800081
Estate size100 hectares, or 247 acres
Main château1,750 square meters across the principal floors, plus lower and upper levels
Main bedroom count stated11 bedrooms on the second floor, plus other bedrooms and apartments elsewhere
Outbuildings1,300 square meters
Historic statusProtected as a French historic monument
Was Epstein in Paris?Strongly supported by contemporaneous emails
Did Epstein visit the château?No confirming record found
Did Epstein make an offer?No confirming record found
Did Epstein buy it?No. Independent reporting identifies different buyers in 2022
Review dateSeptember 21, 2026

Key Findings

  • The brochure was not an unexplained image file. A same title email sent directly to Epstein on June 26, 2018 identifies Château du Marais as a castle for sale and gives the asking price.
  • The approach came through Jean Huguen. Huguen forwarded a chain that originated with Victoire de Pourtalès and passed through Philippe Mugnier. The chain places a member of the owning family at the beginning of the solicitation.
  • The price was €70 million, but the sellers invited negotiation. Victoire de Pourtalès wrote that €70 million was the announced price and that “we are open to discussion.” Mugnier described the price as very high but highly negotiable because of a complex co-ownership situation.
  • Epstein was the direct recipient. The email is addressed to “Jeffrey E.” at the Gmail address used throughout his released correspondence. This is direct evidence of receipt, not merely an appearance in a third party contact list.
  • Epstein was very likely in Paris when he received it. A June 25 exchange arranged a meeting between Epstein and Huguen at “my house.” A June 18 scheduling message separately converted a June 27 call into “8pm Paris time.” Other messages said Epstein would not be back in New York on June 28 or June 29.
  • Paris presence is not property presence. Château du Marais was close enough for a day trip, but no released message reviewed here books a car, names a viewing time, supplies directions, confirms arrival, or thanks a host for a visit.
  • No purchase activity was located. The searches found no Epstein reply to the sales email, offer letter, appraisal, inspection, title review, financing discussion, deposit, wire, purchase entity, or closing record connected to Château du Marais.
  • A separate château design project must not be mixed into this story. Other June 2018 messages discuss a Château de l’Horizon inspired design for Great St. James. Those records concern an architectural concept in the U.S. Virgin Islands, not negotiations over Château du Marais.
  • The property later sold to other buyers. Le Monde reported that Daniel Křetínský acquired the estate with plans for a luxury hotel. The reported 2022 price was €43 million, substantially below the 2018 announced price, although the records do not establish comparable terms or condition.

Evidence Appearances

RecordDateWhat it containsEvidentiary value
EFTA00800058Undated brochure24 page Château du Marais sales presentationIdentifies the property, its scale, amenities, location, and marketing claims
EFTA00902255June 26, 2018Jean Huguen forwards the €70 million sales approach to EpsteinDirect proof that Epstein received the offer
EFTA00939429June 25, 2018Epstein asks Huguen whether 6 at “my house” works; Huguen proposes 5Strong contemporaneous evidence of an in person meeting plan
EFTA00939610June 25, 2018Epstein agrees to 5 and Huguen replies “Perfect thanks”Confirms the proposed meeting time
EFTA02249101June 18, 2018Staff schedules a June 27 call as 2 p.m. Eastern and “8pm Paris time”Strong evidence that Epstein was expected to be in Paris on June 27
EFTA02249523June 25, 2018Staff says Epstein will not be back in New York on Thursday or FridaySupports continued travel outside New York through June 29
EFTA02249468June 25, 2018Staff discusses a UPS delivery of books at the Paris apartment and says Epstein is waiting for themConfirms active use of the Paris residence, but does not by itself prove his physical presence
EFTA02533112June 25, 2018Epstein says he might arrive in Palm Beach Friday nightShows prospective travel planning and does not place him at Château du Marais

The evidence table separates three different propositions: receipt of the offer, presence in Paris, and presence at the property. Only the first is directly proved. The second is strongly supported by converging messages. The third remains unproved.


The June 26, 2018 Sales Approach

EFTA00902255 is a one page email chain with the subject “TR: Chateau du Marais.” Jean Huguen sent it to Epstein at 14:16:57 UTC on June 26, 2018. The released page lists two attachments: DOC MD.pdf and an HTML attachment.

Huguen’s English cover message reads:

Jeffrey
A castle to sell
70 MO€
The price is high but they need money…

The forwarded chain supplies the source and terms:

SenderOriginal messageEnglish meaning
Philippe Mugnier“Voilà le beau château à vendre.”Here is the beautiful château for sale.
Philippe Mugnier“Prix très élevé du fait d’une indivision complexe mais très discutable selon celle des indivisaires de ma connaissance.”The price is very high because of a complex co-ownership arrangement, but very negotiable according to one of the co-owners he knew.
Philippe Mugnier“On en parle.”We will discuss it.
Victoire de Pourtalès“Tu trouveras ci-dessous la présentation de la propriété du Chateau du Marais.”You will find below the presentation of the Château du Marais property.
Victoire de Pourtalès“Le prix est annoncé à 70 millions mais nous sommes ouvert à la discussion.”The announced price is €70 million, but we are open to discussion.

The OCR renders Huguen’s price shorthand as “70 MO€.” The forwarded French text removes the ambiguity by spelling out “70 millions.” The intended figure was therefore €70 million.

The brochure matches the property named in the email and is consistent with the listed PDF attachment. The public production does not expose an attachment hash or parent child link proving that DOC MD.pdf is byte for byte identical to EFTA00800058. The careful formulation is that the brochure appears to be the property presentation attached to or associated with the email.


Who Sent the Offer

The chain has three levels:

  1. Victoire de Pourtalès supplied the property presentation and stated the price and willingness to negotiate.
  2. Philippe Mugnier forwarded it with commentary about the high price and complex co-ownership.
  3. Jean Huguen sent it directly to Epstein and emphasized that the sellers needed money.

This route matters because it was not generic real estate advertising. The message began with a member of the family associated with the property, moved through a personal contact, and reached Epstein through Huguen. W Magazine later described Victoire de Pourtalès as having grown up on the estate and as living and working on part of the property with her family.

The email does not identify Huguen as a buyer’s agent, broker, or legal representative. It shows him functioning as an introducer. It also does not disclose whether he had discussed Epstein’s real estate interests with Mugnier or Pourtalès before forwarding the package.


What the Brochure Contains

The brochure is a visual sales document rather than a contract, appraisal, title report, or survey. Its factual claims should be understood as seller supplied marketing statements unless independently confirmed.

CategoryBrochure description
ConstructionCompleted in 1779 after work beginning in 1772
ArchitectJean-Benoît-Vincent Barré
Original patronJean Le Maître de La Martinière
Architectural styleLouis XVI style with Palladian influence
Estate size100 hectares, or 247 acres
Main principal floors1,750 square meters total
Second floor11 bedrooms, 8 bathrooms, and 3 boudoirs
Other residential spaceThree paneled apartments, a top floor apartment, mansard rooms, dome rooms, and caretaker accommodation
Outbuildings1,300 square meters, including stables, garage, former dungeons, salons, kitchens, and many additional rooms
Water featureA reflecting pool called “The Mirror,” 550 meters long and 55 meters wide
GroundsFormal gardens, woodland, fields, moats, canals, plane tree drive, pavilions, and former mill
UtilitiesCentral heating and water from a natural spring on the property
Transport claims48 kilometers from Orly Airport and 7 kilometers from the A10 motorway
Additional landSeven hectares of wooded farmland described as separately available for purchase

The brochure says the château, outbuildings, and park were listed as a national historic monument. The French Ministry of Culture record confirms that major parts of the estate were classified as a Monument historique on March 26, 1965. The official record covers the château, courtyard and pavilions, moats, specified outbuildings, formal garden, wooded park, entry avenue, and water features.


Was Epstein in Paris When He Received It?

The available records strongly support that conclusion, although no single released flight manifest shown here proves his exact arrival date.

On June 25, one day before the sales email, Epstein asked Huguen, “Does 6 at my house work.” Huguen replied that he had a 7 o’clock appointment and proposed 5. Epstein answered “Yes,” and Huguen replied “Perfect thanks.” Because Huguen was based in Paris and Epstein maintained a Paris residence, the exchange strongly indicates a meeting planned at Epstein’s Paris home.

A separate staff message sent June 18 scheduled a call with Andrew Farkas for June 27 at 2 p.m. Eastern and explicitly converted the time to “8pm Paris time.” That conversion is strong evidence that staff expected Epstein to be in Paris the day after the château offer arrived.

On June 25, another staff message said Epstein would not be back in New York on Thursday or Friday, June 28 and June 29. A same day exchange concerned an attempted delivery at the Paris apartment and said Epstein was waiting for the books. The delivery proves activity at the residence, not necessarily his presence at the door. Read together with the meeting and time zone records, however, it reinforces the Paris context.

The most accurate finding is therefore:

PropositionAssessment
Epstein received the château offerConfirmed
Epstein was in Paris around June 25 through June 27Strongly supported
Epstein met Huguen on June 25Planned and accepted in writing, but completion is not independently confirmed
Huguen discussed the château during that meetingPossible, but not documented
Epstein traveled from Paris to the châteauNot established

Did Epstein Visit Château du Marais?

No released record located in this review confirms a visit.

The property was within practical driving distance of Epstein’s Paris residence. The brochure describes it as 50 kilometers south of Paris and 48 kilometers from Orly Airport. W Magazine described the trip from Paris as about an hour by car. That makes a viewing feasible. Feasibility is not evidence that a viewing happened.

The archive searches reviewed for this article covered the exact property name, common spelling variants without accents, Le Val-Saint-Germain, Victoire de Pourtalès, the €70 million price, and combinations of Huguen with “castle” and “chateau.” The only direct Château du Marais results were the brochure and the June 26 email chain.

No record found in that search set contains:

  • a proposed viewing date
  • a confirmation from the owners
  • a driver or car reservation
  • directions to Le Val-Saint-Germain
  • an itinerary naming the château
  • a security movement record
  • a photograph placing Epstein on the estate
  • a thank you message after a tour
  • a witness statement describing a visit
  • a calendar entry for the property

It is therefore improper to write that Epstein “went there” as a fact. The responsible formulation is that he was in Paris, received a direct offer for a nearby estate, and could have visited, but no confirming evidence of a visit has been located.


Did Epstein Try to Buy It?

Receipt of a sales package shows that the opportunity was presented to Epstein. It does not by itself show serious purchase intent.

No located record shows Epstein replying to Huguen about the property. No located record asks for a lower price, a private tour, plans, tax information, maintenance costs, staffing costs, title documents, the identities of co-owners, or terms for resolving the indivision. No appraisal, legal memorandum, purchase vehicle, letter of intent, deposit, wire, or closing document was found under the property name.

The email language also stops short of saying that Epstein had requested a French château. Huguen may have forwarded the opportunity because he thought it would interest Epstein, because of Epstein’s known interest in architecture and large residences, or after an unrecorded conversation. The files reviewed here do not distinguish among those possibilities.

The evidence supports “offered to Epstein” and “received by Epstein.” It does not support “pursued by Epstein,” “bid on by Epstein,” or “owned by Epstein.”


Do Not Confuse This With the Great St. James Château Project

Several records from the same period use the generic word “chateau.” They concern a different project.

In February 2018, Epstein asked about a house shown in a film about the Agnelli family. Karyna Shuliak identified it as Château de l’Horizon, the famous modernist villa near Cannes. On May 31, Epstein asked Ariane de Rothschild for floor plans of the Agnelli family’s south of France house. Architect Ramon Alonso then discussed a presentation of “the Chateau over GSJ,” meaning a château inspired design concept associated with Great St. James in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

During June 2018, Alonso and Epstein exchanged messages about renderings, a printed presentation, images, and design choices for that project. Those records include EFTA02652340, EFTA02650685, EFTA02647010, EFTA02645426, EFTA02587663, and EFTA02523604.

They show that Epstein was actively interested in château style architecture when the Château du Marais offer arrived. They do not show follow up on the French estate. Treating every nearby reference to “the chateau” as Château du Marais would create a false paper trail.


Evidence Timeline

DateEventWhat it establishes
February 8, 2018Shuliak identifies Château de l’Horizon in response to Epstein’s architecture questionEarlier interest in a different château
May 31, 2018Epstein seeks Château de l’Horizon floor plans; Alonso discusses a château concept over Great St. JamesActive architectural project unrelated to Château du Marais
June 18, 2018Staff describes a June 27 call as occurring at “8pm Paris time”Epstein was expected in Paris
June 23, 2018Victoire de Pourtalès sends the property presentation and €70 million asking price to Philippe MugnierOrigin of the located sales chain
June 25, 2018Epstein and Huguen agree on a 5 o’clock meeting at “my house”Strong evidence of a planned Paris meeting
June 25, 2018Staff says Epstein will not be back in New York on June 28 or June 29Supports continued travel outside New York
June 26, 2018Huguen forwards the château offer to EpsteinDirect proof of receipt
June 27, 2018Scheduled call was expressed in Paris timeFurther Paris location support
June 29, 2018Other Huguen correspondence discusses travel and design work, not Château du MaraisNo located follow up on the property
July 11, 2018Huguen reports arriving at Newark for a contractor meeting at Epstein’s New York houseLater design meeting, unrelated to the French château
June 2022Property changes ownership, according to later reportingEstate ultimately sold to other buyers
September 1, 2022Le Monde reports Křetínský as buyer and cites a reported €43 million priceIndependent confirmation of a later sale

Later Sale and Ownership

The French Ministry of Culture identifies Château du Marais as private property and confirms its historic protection. Le Monde reported in September 2022 that the families Frotier de Bagneux and de Pourtalès, which had held the estate for more than a century, sold it after years on the market. The report identified Czech businessman Daniel Křetínský as the buyer and said the plan was to convert the estate into a luxury hotel and develop equestrian activities.

Le Monde stated that the transaction amount was not publicly disclosed by the parties, but cited Bloomberg reporting that put it at €43 million. Other reporting said Křetínský undertook the acquisition with Czech businessman Jiří Šmejc.

The €43 million figure should not be presented as a direct measure of what Epstein could have paid in 2018. Four years separated the offer and sale. The composition of the property, ownership interests, preservation obligations, condition, included land, financing, and transaction terms may have differed. It does show that the €70 million figure in the Epstein email was an announced asking price rather than a demonstrated market value.


Technical File Examination

The uploaded copy is an unencrypted PDF containing 24 pages. Every page contains a 1,178 by 849 pixel raster image. The production sequence begins with EFTA00800058 and ends with EFTA00800081.

Technical fieldResult
FilenameEFTA00800058.pdf
Bates rangeEFTA00800058 through EFTA00800081
Pages24
File size6,670,400 bytes
PDF version1.5
Page size883.5 by 654.75 points
EncryptionNone detected
Embedded page images24
Image dimensions1,178 by 849 pixels each
Effective image resolution96 pixels per inch
Custom metadataNone detected
Metadata streamNone detected
PDF SHA2560a5d2e6b84f354488613e05506bbcfdec0bf87f278abbc2079b631ae9da40d88

The PDF has searchable OCR, but the extraction contains errors such as misspelled names, incorrect century text, and confused unit labels. Architectural names and measurements should be checked against the visible pages and independent records rather than copied blindly from OCR.

Public corpus metadata places the brochure in DOJ Data Set 9 and lists no sender, email date, original filename, custodian, parent document, or native file. The lack of a disclosed parent child link is why the attachment relationship to EFTA00902255 is described as apparent rather than technically proven.


What the Evidence Establishes

The available evidence establishes that:

  • a 24 page Château du Marais sales brochure appears in the released Epstein files
  • Jean Huguen directly emailed Epstein about the property on June 26, 2018
  • the sales chain originated with Victoire de Pourtalès and passed through Philippe Mugnier
  • the announced asking price was €70 million
  • the sellers were open to discussion
  • Mugnier described a complex co-ownership situation and said the price was highly negotiable
  • Huguen told Epstein that the sellers needed money
  • contemporaneous records strongly support that Epstein was in Paris when the offer arrived
  • the estate was within practical driving distance of Paris
  • independent reporting identifies different buyers in 2022

What the Evidence Does Not Establish

The available evidence does not establish that:

  • Epstein asked to receive the brochure
  • Epstein replied to the sales proposal
  • Epstein discussed the property with Huguen in person
  • Epstein visited Le Val-Saint-Germain
  • Epstein entered Château du Marais
  • Epstein met Victoire de Pourtalès or any co-owner
  • Epstein commissioned an appraisal or inspection
  • Epstein made an offer or negotiated a price
  • Epstein created an entity to acquire the property
  • Epstein paid a deposit or transferred funds
  • Epstein ever held a legal or beneficial interest in the estate
  • the brochure’s marketing claims were independently verified for a contemplated Epstein transaction

Why This Record Matters

EFTA00800058 initially looks like an isolated luxury property brochure. EFTA00902255 changes its meaning. It shows that a historic French estate with a €70 million asking price was personally pitched to Epstein through his design contact while he was in Paris.

The episode adds a documented real estate solicitation to the late period of Epstein’s correspondence. It also illustrates why production context matters. A brochure cannot reveal who received it, when, or why. An adjacent or separately produced email can supply those facts.

The same episode demonstrates the danger of overstating archival evidence. The offer is documented. Interest beyond receipt is not. Paris presence is strongly supported. A château visit is not. A responsible account preserves those boundaries instead of turning a plausible trip into a claimed event.


Open Questions

  • Is DOC MD.pdf the original filename of the brochure produced as EFTA00800058?
  • Did Epstein respond in an email that has not been released, is redacted, or is indexed under another subject?
  • Did Huguen and Epstein discuss the property during their planned June 25 meeting?
  • Why did Huguen send the sales package one day after that meeting?
  • Did any assistant, driver, security employee, or property representative arrange a viewing?
  • Who were all the co-owners referenced by Mugnier’s description of a complex indivision?
  • Was the seven hectare optional parcel included in the €70 million asking price?
  • Did Epstein or an adviser receive financial, legal, structural, or preservation documents not present in the located production?
  • Was the brochure sent to any other potential buyer in the released files?
  • What explains the difference between the 2018 asking price and the price reported in 2022?

Related Evidence


Sources

Previous Château de Chantilly and the Epstein Evidence Photo Investigation
Next EFTA00506228: Little Saint James Property Assessment and Renovation Plan
Table of Contents