EFTA00690252: Jeffrey Epstein Provides Sexual Coaching, Recruitment Direction, and Travel Arrangements in Extended Email Thread (January and February 2012)

PostedFebruary 19, 2026

UpdatedSeptember 14, 2026

ByEpsteinWiki

Snapshot

Field	Details
Primary record	EFTA00690252
Page range	EFTA00690252 through EFTA00690257
Length	Six pages
Record type	Extended email thread
Date range inside thread	January 11 through February 5, 2012
Latest message	February 5, 2012 at 4:24:30 a.m. UTC
Primary correspondent	Redacted in EFTA00690252
Correspondent identified through duplicate	A visible email address in EFTA02006327 identifies Miranda Mako
Other correspondent	Jeffrey Epstein
Epstein email account	jeevacation@gmail.com
Locations referenced	Vienna, Paris, New York, Casablanca, and Davos
Organizations referenced	Global Shapers Community and an apparent reference to Clifford Chance
Other people referenced	Adrianna and an unidentified man described as the “Sasha Grey guy”
Key conduct	Sexual coaching, instructions to find women, Skype coordination, and an offer to purchase travel
Producing authority	United States Department of Justice
DOJ collection	Data Set 9
Related less redacted record	EFTA02006327
Evidentiary status	Direct communication record
Important limitation	The thread does not identify the ages of the women discussed or prove that anyone was recruited, trafficked, or harmed as a result

EFTA00690252 preserves an extended email conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and a correspondent whose identity is redacted in the primary record. A less redacted duplicate, EFTA02006327, displays a Yahoo email address containing the name Miranda Mako.

The thread begins on January 11, 2012 and continues through February 5, 2012. It combines explicit sexual discussion, requests for Epstein’s advice, career and social networking references, Skype coordination, a possible trip to Paris, an offer to send the correspondent a ticket to New York, and Epstein’s repeated instructions to locate women he considered interesting or fun.

On January 21, Epstein told the correspondent to “find fun girls.” On January 31, he gave a more direct instruction:

“your job is to find interesting girls”

A related copy, EFTA00687054, preserves the correspondent’s response that she would notify Epstein if she found someone “amazing” who was a woman.

The record documents Epstein attempting to convert a sexualized mentoring relationship into a source of introductions to other women. It does not establish the ages of those women, whether any introductions occurred, or whether the instructions resulted in criminal recruitment or trafficking.

What Is This Record?

EFTA00690252 is a six page printed email chain released through the Department of Justice Epstein disclosures.

The thread contains messages exchanged over approximately twenty five days. Because each response quotes earlier messages, the document reconstructs much of the conversation in reverse chronological order.

The latest visible message in EFTA00690252 was sent to Epstein on February 5, 2012. The correspondent describes pain associated with a sexual act. The quoted thread then moves backward through Epstein’s instructions, sexual advice, travel offer, Skype scheduling, and earlier comments about the correspondent’s appearance and confidence.

The conversation is written primarily in English, but the email headers use German terms:

German header	English meaning
Von	From
An	To
Gesendet	Sent
Betreff	Subject

The German formatting is consistent with an email account or device configured for a German language interface. It does not establish the correspondent’s citizenship or physical location for every message.

The thread repeatedly includes Epstein’s standard confidentiality notice. That automated language does not independently establish attorney and client privilege, confidentiality recognized by a court, or any legal restriction on government disclosure.

Source and Provenance

EFTA00690252 appears in DOJ Data Set 9 and covers six consecutive pages:

The governmental copy can be accessed through DOJ Data Set 9. The broader release is available through the Department of Justice Epstein disclosures portal.

Multiple duplicates preserve portions of the same conversation. These copies contain different starting messages, redactions, metadata, secondary evidence numbers, and amounts of quoted material.

Duplicate Record Map

Record	Pages	Material added or preserved
EFTA00690252	6	Primary thread ending with the February 5 description of pain
EFTA00690258	7	Adds Epstein’s response that the sexual act was performed incorrectly and the correspondent’s reply
EFTA00687054	1	Preserves the correspondent’s response to Epstein’s instruction to find women
EFTA00928388	5	Preserves the January 27 Skype discussion and earlier thread
EFTA00928472	2	Isolates Epstein’s January 21 travel offer
EFTA00928499	4	Preserves the club discussion and instruction to find women
EFTA01841553	8	Adds a later February 5 message from Epstein apparently requesting Skype
EFTA02006327	7	Displays portions of an email address containing “miranda mako”
EFTA02006385	8	Preserves the February 5 continuation with secondary evidence numbering
EFTA02381320	1	Preserves the correspondent’s January 31 response and part of the thread

The duplicate copies support the authenticity and continuity of the exchange. They also demonstrate inconsistent redaction across separate DOJ productions.

What the Record Contains

Sexual Coaching

The correspondent repeatedly reports sexual experiences and asks Epstein for advice.

On January 15, she describes receiving considerable sexual attention in Vienna and asks Epstein for new “tricks.” Epstein responds by reminding her that he had predicted increased confidence would attract men.

On January 21, she reports continuing difficulty reaching orgasm and asks when Epstein will be in Paris.

On January 31, she asks Epstein for a phrase that would express sexual availability to men. Epstein responds with an explicitly sexual statement and immediately assigns her the task of finding women for him.

On February 5, the correspondent tells Epstein that a particular sexual act caused substantial pain. In EFTA00690258, Epstein answers:

“it was done wrong”

The correspondent replies that the act might be possible but that she did not know how to do it properly. A later message in EFTA01841553 shows Epstein apparently asking to communicate through Skype.

These exchanges document Epstein acting as a source of sexual instruction and validation. They do not establish whether any advice was followed or whether the interactions were consensual, coercive, exploitative, or part of a broader arrangement.

Direction to Find Women

Epstein issues two visible instructions concerning other women.

On January 21, after the correspondent discusses a club and compares it with another venue, Epstein writes:

“find fun girls”

On January 31, Epstein gives a more explicit assignment, telling the correspondent that her “job” is to find interesting women.

The correspondent’s reply is preserved in EFTA00687054. She says that if she finds someone remarkable who is a woman, she will inform him.

The exchange is direct evidence of Epstein requesting introductions to women. It does not establish the ages of the women, the criteria Epstein expected the correspondent to use, or whether she eventually introduced anyone.

Travel Arrangements

On January 21, the correspondent asks when Epstein will next be in Paris.

Epstein answers that he expects to be there on March 17. He then offers an alternative:

“otherwise you should come to ny.. i will send ticket”

This is a direct offer to arrange or finance travel to New York.

The document does not contain a ticket, itinerary, reservation, travel agency message, payment record, or confirmation that the trip occurred.

Skype Coordination

On January 27, the correspondent asks when Epstein can use Skype. Epstein asks whether she is available immediately. She replies that she is at work and asks whether they can communicate that evening.

Epstein later proposes trying. A related copy in EFTA00928388 shows another brief response asking whether the correspondent is available at that moment.

Skype would have allowed the pair to communicate outside the visible email thread. The record does not establish whether a call occurred, whether video was used, or what was discussed.

Career and Social Influence

On January 31, the correspondent tells Epstein that events had been going well since she met him. She attributes a change in another man’s attitude to Epstein’s “teachings.”

She also reports that:

A man she identifies only through a reference to adult performer Sasha Grey suggested that she become involved with the Davos Young Global Shapers.
A new Casablanca office was opening.
She approached the responsible partner about helping establish that office.
Her internship in Paris would probably be extended.
She wanted Epstein to continue teaching her.

The Casablanca reference appears to concern Clifford Chance. The firm’s official announcement confirms that its Casablanca office opened on February 7, 2012, shortly after the email.

The “Davos young global shapers” reference appears to concern the Global Shapers Community, an initiative founded by the World Economic Forum in 2011.

The email does not establish that Clifford Chance, the World Economic Forum, Global Shapers, or Sasha Grey knew about Epstein’s instructions or participated in any improper activity.

Key Evidence

Epstein Combined Mentorship With Sexual Direction

The correspondent describes Epstein as teaching her how to project confidence, interact with men, and improve her social or professional position.

Epstein responds by directing her attention toward sexual activity and finding women for him.

This combination is significant because the career advice, validation, sexual coaching, travel support, and requests for introductions appear within one continuing relationship.

The record supports describing Epstein’s role as a sexualized mentor or adviser. It does not establish the precise power imbalance, emotional dependency, or degree of coercion within that relationship.

Epstein Treated Finding Women as an Assigned Task

The phrase “your job” frames locating women as an expected responsibility rather than a casual suggestion.

That wording is evidence of recruitment direction. It is not proof of employment, payment, trafficking, or a completed recruitment.

The Correspondent Indicated Willingness to Participate

The response preserved in EFTA00687054 states that the correspondent would tell Epstein if she found an impressive woman.

This demonstrates at least verbal agreement to look for or identify someone. The record does not show that she actually found, contacted, persuaded, transported, or introduced anyone.

Epstein Offered to Purchase Travel

Epstein’s offer to send a ticket to New York is a concrete logistical proposal.

Travel support can be important when evaluating how Epstein maintained relationships and brought people into his physical environment. In this instance, however, no completed travel is documented.

The Thread Continued After Explicit Sexual Disclosures

The February 5 messages show that the communication did not end after Epstein’s recruitment direction. The correspondent continued seeking or receiving sexual advice.

The related records suggest Epstein attempted to move the conversation to Skype. This creates an evidentiary gap because any resulting call would not be preserved in the email chain.

A Duplicate Reveals the Correspondent’s Email Identity

EFTA00690252 redacts the correspondent’s identity. EFTA02006327 displays portions of a Yahoo address containing the name “miranda mako.”

This cross copy comparison supports identifying the correspondent as Miranda Mako. It also illustrates why redactions must be compared across duplicate DOJ releases before an identity is treated as resolved.

What It Proves

The record establishes that:

Jeffrey Epstein exchanged emails with a correspondent between January 11 and February 5, 2012.
A less redacted duplicate displays an email address containing the name Miranda Mako.
The correspondence included explicit sexual discussion.
The correspondent asked Epstein for advice concerning sexual activity.
Epstein provided encouragement concerning confidence, appearance, and sexual attention.
Epstein told the correspondent to find “fun girls.”
Epstein later told the correspondent that her “job” was to find interesting women.
The correspondent stated that she would notify Epstein if she found an impressive woman.
Epstein offered to send a ticket for the correspondent to travel to New York.
Epstein stated that he expected to be in Paris on March 17.
The correspondents attempted to coordinate Skype communication.
The correspondent described an internship in Paris and a possible role connected to a Casablanca office.
The correspondent referenced the Davos Young Global Shapers.
The correspondent credited Epstein’s teachings with changes in her confidence and treatment by others.
The conversation continued after Epstein directed her to find women.
Multiple copies preserve the exchange with differing redactions and metadata.

What It Does Not Prove

The record does not establish:

The age of Miranda Mako at the time of the correspondence.
The ages of the women Epstein wanted her to find.
That “girls” referred to minors.
That Mako introduced anyone to Epstein.
That any woman was recruited, transported, exploited, or abused because of these messages.
That Epstein paid Mako to locate women.
That “your job” described formal employment.
That the offered ticket was purchased.
That Mako traveled to New York as a result of the offer.
That Epstein met her in Paris on March 17.
That a Skype call occurred.
What would have been discussed during a Skype call.
That the correspondent’s sexual experiences involved Epstein.
That the relationship was fully consensual.
That the relationship was coercive.
That the correspondent was acting as part of Epstein’s established trafficking operation.
That Adrianna was recruited or introduced to Epstein.
The identity of Adrianna.
The identity of the “Sasha Grey guy.”
Any involvement by Sasha Grey in the correspondence.
Any involvement by Clifford Chance in Epstein’s conduct.
Any involvement by the World Economic Forum or Global Shapers in Epstein’s conduct.
That the Casablanca opportunity resulted from Epstein’s intervention.
That the repeated confidentiality footer created legal privilege.
That the full conversation is preserved.

The thread is evidence of direction and stated willingness. It is not evidence of a completed recruitment unless connected with additional communications, travel records, witness testimony, or financial documentation.

People and Entities

Person or entity	Role in the record	Evidentiary status
Jeffrey Epstein	Correspondent providing sexual advice, recruitment direction, and a travel offer	Confirmed
Miranda Mako	Identity indicated by a visible email address in a less redacted duplicate	Supported by cross copy comparison
Adrianna	Woman mentioned in connection with a club and a sexual device	First name only, identity unresolved
“Sasha Grey guy”	Unidentified man associated by the correspondent with a possible Global Shapers opportunity	Identity unresolved
Sasha Grey	Adult performer whose name is used only as a reference point	No direct participation shown
Clifford Chance	Apparent firm connected to the Casablanca office reference	Contextually supported, not expressly written in full
Casablanca office partner	Person approached by the correspondent about working in Morocco	Not identified
Global Shapers Community	Organization referenced through “Davos young global shapers”	Confirmed as the apparent organization discussed
World Economic Forum	Founder of the Global Shapers Community	No participation in the emails shown
Les Chandelles	Club referenced by the correspondent	No institutional connection to Epstein established
Department of Justice	Releasing authority	Confirmed
Epstein Data	Public document research archive	Secondary access platform

The phrase “Sasha Grey guy” does not establish that Sasha Grey introduced the correspondent to anyone, knew Epstein, or knew about the communication. The reference concerns an unidentified man.

Timeline

Date	Communication or event
January 11, 2012	Epstein tells the correspondent that there will be another opportunity and praises her
January 15, 2012	Correspondent discusses sexual attention in Vienna and asks for new advice
January 15, 2012	Epstein connects the attention to increased confidence
January 21, 2012	Correspondent asks when Epstein will return to Paris
January 21, 2012	Epstein says March 17 and offers to send a ticket to New York
January 21, 2012	Correspondent describes attending a sexual club with two French women
January 21, 2012	Epstein asks about a club name
January 21, 2012	Correspondent compares the venue with Les Chandelles
January 22, 2012	Epstein tells the correspondent to find “fun girls”
January 22, 2012	Correspondent complains that people at the clubs are not interesting and mentions Adrianna
January 22, 2012	Epstein responds with a comment about people being constrained by other people’s ideas
January 27, 2012	Correspondent asks when Epstein can use Skype
January 27, 2012	Epstein attempts to coordinate an immediate or later call
January 31, 2012	Correspondent credits Epstein’s teachings with increased confidence and professional developments
January 31, 2012	Epstein tells the correspondent he is always available
January 31, 2012	Correspondent asks for an explicitly sexual phrase to use with men
January 31, 2012	Epstein supplies a phrase and tells her to find interesting women
January 31, 2012	Correspondent says she will notify Epstein if she finds an impressive woman
February 5, 2012	Correspondent reports pain from a sexual act
February 5, 2012	Epstein says it was performed incorrectly
February 5, 2012	Correspondent says she does not know how to do it properly
February 5, 2012	Epstein apparently asks for Skype communication
February 7, 2012	Clifford Chance officially announces the opening of its Casablanca office

Email export formats show a mixture of UTC timestamps and localized German display times. Minor time differences should not be treated as separate conversations unless the underlying headers establish that distinction.

Related Evidence

EFTA00687054

EFTA00687054 contains the correspondent’s response to Epstein’s January 31 instruction. It confirms that she indicated a willingness to tell him if she found a woman she considered impressive.

EFTA00690258

EFTA00690258 begins with the correspondent’s February 5 response to Epstein’s sexual advice. It extends the target record by showing that she described herself as inexperienced with the act being discussed.

EFTA00928472

EFTA00928472 isolates the travel exchange. It provides a clear header identifying Epstein as the sender of the January 21 offer to purchase a New York ticket.

EFTA00928499

EFTA00928499 preserves the sequence in which the correspondent discusses clubs and Epstein responds with an instruction to find women.

EFTA01841553

EFTA01841553 contains a later Epstein message that appears to request Skype communication. This is relevant because the parties had already attempted to coordinate Skype on January 27.

EFTA02006327

EFTA02006327 is important for identification. Its less complete redaction exposes portions of an address containing “miranda mako.”

Later February 2012 Communications

A February 19, 2012 JMail thread identifies Miranda Mako and preserves additional correspondence with Epstein. Later records should be analyzed separately because they concern different people, encounters, and instructions.

Greg Olear’s Substack investigation, “Heir Apparent: Is Ian Osborne Jeffrey Epstein 2.0?”, examines later February 2012 messages in which Epstein allegedly directed Miranda’s interaction with Ian Osborne. That reporting provides important context, but its interpretations should be checked against the underlying EFTA records.

Related EpsteinWiki Evidence Pages

The thread should also be compared with:

Each record must be evaluated independently before researchers infer a larger pattern.

Reliability

High Reliability Findings

Finding	Reliability
Epstein participated in the email conversation	High
The thread covers January 11 through February 5, 2012	High
Epstein offered to send a ticket to New York	High
Epstein directed the correspondent to find women	High
The correspondent indicated willingness to notify him about a woman	High
The conversation included sexual coaching	High
The parties attempted to coordinate Skype	High
Multiple duplicate records exist	High
A duplicate exposes the name “miranda mako” in an email address	High
Clifford Chance opened a Casablanca office in February 2012	High

Interpretive Findings

Finding	Reliability
Epstein acted as a sexualized mentor	High, based on the language and repeated advice
Epstein expected the correspondent to provide introductions	Moderate to high
Epstein used professional encouragement to reinforce influence	Moderate
Skype would have moved communication outside the written record	Reasonable inference
The relationship contained a significant power imbalance	Possible, but not measurable from this thread alone

Unresolved Claims

Claim	Status
The correspondent recruited women for Epstein	Not established by this record
Any woman discussed was underage	Not established
The New York trip occurred	Not established
The March 17 Paris meeting occurred	Not established
Epstein arranged the correspondent’s career opportunities	Not established
The relationship was coercive	Unresolved
Clifford Chance knew of the correspondence	No evidence
Global Shapers knew of the correspondence	No evidence
The full conversation was preserved	Unlikely, given the Skype references and missing context

Survivor Safety and Privacy

This record contains explicit sexual language and references to women whose identities and ages are not established.

Researchers should not identify Adrianna without corroborating evidence. A first name appearing in an email is insufficient to connect the person to a public figure, employee, survivor, or alleged recruiter.

The phrase “girls” must be reported exactly and examined carefully because Epstein had a documented history of abusing minors. However, the word alone does not establish that the women discussed in this thread were underage.

The correspondence should not be used to label Miranda Mako a trafficker or criminal recruiter without evidence of a completed act, knowledge of Epstein’s criminal purpose, or participation in exploitation. The record documents Epstein’s request and the correspondent’s stated willingness to identify women. It does not show an introduction occurring.

It is equally important not to dismiss the correspondent’s possible vulnerability merely because she engaged in explicit conversation or appeared to seek Epstein’s approval. Sexual participation, explicit language, education, employment, or professional ambition does not eliminate the possibility of manipulation or exploitation.

Why This Matters

EFTA00690252 provides a direct view of how Epstein mixed sexual instruction, personal validation, career advice, travel support, and requests for access to other women.

The thread does not show a single isolated request. It documents a progression:

Stage	Documented conduct
Validation	Epstein praises the correspondent and reinforces her confidence
Sexual coaching	He advises her about attracting men and sexual activity
Access	He offers to arrange travel and attempts to communicate through Skype
Direction	He instructs her to find women
Agreement	She says she will notify him if she finds someone
Continued influence	She returns to Epstein for additional sexual advice

This progression is important because recruitment networks are not always documented through formal instructions, contracts, or payments. They may develop through social influence, mentorship, favors, travel, sexual normalization, and expectations of reciprocity.

At the same time, responsible analysis must stop where the evidence stops. This thread documents the direction to find women. It does not document a completed recruitment or prove that the correspondent understood that Epstein might exploit anyone she introduced.

Fact Check

Claim	Finding	Assessment
EFTA00690252 is a six page email thread	Pages EFTA00690252 through EFTA00690257	Confirmed
The thread begins in January 2012	Earliest quoted message is January 11	Confirmed
The latest message is from February 5, 2012	Header shows February 5	Confirmed
Epstein offered to send a New York ticket	Preserved in the January 21 exchange	Confirmed
Epstein said he expected to be in Paris on March 17	Preserved in the same message	Confirmed
Epstein instructed the correspondent to find women	Two separate instructions appear	Confirmed
Epstein called finding women her “job”	The January 31 message uses that word	Confirmed
The correspondent agreed to introduce a specific woman	She agreed only to notify him if she found someone	Not established
The women were minors	No ages appear	Not established
The correspondent was paid to recruit	No payment appears	Not established
A trip to New York occurred	No itinerary or confirmation appears	Not established
The pair communicated through Skype	They attempted to schedule it, but no completed call is documented	Unconfirmed
The correspondent was Miranda Mako	A less redacted duplicate displays that name in an email address	Supported
Adrianna’s full identity is known	Only a first name appears	False
Sasha Grey participated in the exchange	She is only referenced indirectly	False
Clifford Chance opened in Casablanca at that time	Official firm records show a February 7, 2012 opening	Confirmed
Clifford Chance participated in Epstein’s conduct	No such evidence appears	Not established
Global Shapers participated in Epstein’s conduct	No such evidence appears	Not established
Epstein provided sexual coaching	Multiple responses provide advice or evaluation	Confirmed
The thread proves sex trafficking	No completed recruitment, transport, or exploitation is documented	False
The confidentiality footer proves legal privilege	Boilerplate language alone is insufficient	False

Questions Still Unanswered

What was the complete unredacted email address used by the correspondent?
Are there additional copies displaying the full sender name?
How and when did Epstein meet Miranda Mako?
What did Epstein mean by describing the search for women as her “job”?
Did Epstein offer money, employment, travel, or other benefits in return for introductions?
Did Mako identify or introduce any women after January 31?
Who was Adrianna?
Who was the man described as the “Sasha Grey guy”?
Did that man have any direct relationship with Epstein?
Did the correspondent apply to the Global Shapers Community?
Was she selected?
Was the Casablanca opportunity connected to Clifford Chance?
Did Epstein intervene in the correspondent’s internship or career?
Did Epstein purchase the proposed New York ticket?
Did the correspondent travel to New York?
Did Epstein travel to Paris on March 17?
Did the two communicate through Skype?
Were Skype account records preserved?
What conversations occurred before January 11?
What conversations followed the February 5 Skype request?
Were any of the women discussed minors?
Did the correspondent know about Epstein’s 2008 Florida conviction?
Did Epstein disclose his status as a registered sex offender?
Did investigators interview the correspondent?
Did investigators compare this thread with Epstein’s travel, payment, telephone, or visitor records?

Communication Records