EFTA02335546: Maxwell Email to Philip Levine Discussing “Baron” (Dog)

UpdatedSeptember 14, 2026

ByEpsteinWiki

A January 21, 2002 email chain between “G. Max” and Philip Levine uses playful language about Baron, a male dog, and Cam, apparently another dog. The record documents personal familiarity between the correspondents but contains no allegation or evidence of criminal conduct.

Evidence Snapshot

Document ID: EFTA02335546

Internal Bates number: EFTA_R1_01282950

Document type: Email correspondence

Displayed date: January 21, 2002

Participants: “G. Max” and Philip Levine

Subject line: RE:

Collection: United States Department of Justice Epstein Files, Data Set 11

Length: One page

Primary subject: Photographs and behavior of a dog named Baron

Other names appearing in the text: Cam and Fisher

Attachments: Photographs are mentioned, but no photographs appear in the released page

Evidence classification: Personal correspondence with limited value for relationship and communication mapping

Content warning: The email contains explicit colloquial language describing a dog mounting another animal

Central finding: The sexual language in this record concerns dog behavior. The document does not describe a human sexual encounter, a minor, trafficking, or abuse.

Why This Document Matters

The principal evidentiary value of EFTA02335546 is its documentation of direct and familiar communication between Ghislaine Maxwell and Philip Levine in January 2002.

The exchange shows that the correspondents shared photographs, private jokes, and domestic stories. Maxwell writes as someone personally attached to Baron, while Levine provides a detailed update about the dog’s behavior. Their language indicates an established social relationship rather than a formal, legal, political, or business communication.

This evidence must be interpreted proportionately. A personal email can establish contact and familiarity without establishing knowledge of, participation in, or responsibility for another person’s misconduct. Appearance in an Epstein related document collection does not by itself prove wrongdoing.

The document is also important as a warning against reading isolated phrases without context. References to being “unfaithful,” bladder control, urination, mounting, size, and “growing up” all concern Baron, who is plainly described as a male dog. Treating those phrases as descriptions of human sexual conduct would materially distort the record.

The email therefore contributes to network chronology while also demonstrating why researchers must distinguish probative evidence from conversational noise. That distinction is central to the EpsteinWiki evidence framework.

What the Document Shows

The released page identifies the sender of the visible messages as “G. Max” and the recipient as Philip Levine. The initials, the “Gx” signoff, the document title, related correspondence, and the broader archive support identifying “G. Max” as Ghislaine Maxwell. Her full name is not printed in the visible sender field on this page.

Maxwell refers to photographs that Levine apparently sent to her. She jokingly describes Baron as being “unfaithful” with another female and asks whether Baron urinated on her.

Maxwell’s reference to urination is linked to her interpretation of the dog’s territorial or threatened behavior. She jokes that, if Baron did not urinate on the other animal, she still holds “pride of place.”

Levine responds with an update about Baron’s bladder control. He states that Baron held his bladder through the night until dinner at “Fisher.”

Levine also says Baron jumped on Cam and attempted to mount her on his bed. He describes Cam as being the same size as Baron and concludes, “The Baron is growing up!”

The references to bladder control, urination, size, animal mounting behavior, and maturation establish that Baron is a male dog. Cam is described with female pronouns and appears from context to be another dog or comparable animal. The document does not establish Cam’s breed, ownership, age, or precise identity.

The closing message from Maxwell reads, “Stop it. My jealous quodlibet,” followed by a parenthetical instruction to consult a dictionary, and then states that it “is already full.”

“Quodlibet” ordinarily refers to a point proposed for philosophical or theological debate, a disputation, or a whimsical combination of familiar melodies or texts. It does not ordinarily mean a quota, container, or emotional capacity. Maxwell’s use of the word appears playful or idiosyncratic, but the intended private meaning cannot be determined from this page alone. See the Merriam Webster definition of quodlibet.

The exchange ends with Maxwell’s customary “Gx” signoff.

What the Document Does Not Show

The document does not show Jeffrey Epstein as a sender, recipient, copied participant, or subject of the conversation.

It does not describe human sexual activity. The explicit language in Levine’s message describes a dog attempting to mount another animal.

It does not identify a minor or contain any discussion of recruitment, grooming, trafficking, exploitation, coercion, or abuse.

It does not establish that Maxwell or Levine engaged in misconduct.

It does not support claims involving bestiality, a urine related fetish, or human sexual behavior. Such interpretations would disregard the direct animal context supplied by both correspondents.

It does not identify who owned Baron or Cam. Maxwell’s affectionate language may indicate personal attachment to Baron, but attachment is not proof of legal ownership or primary care.

It does not identify “Fisher.” Fisher could refer to a person, residence, restaurant, gathering, or another place or event. The page provides insufficient information to choose among those possibilities.

It does not reveal where the exchange occurred or where Baron and Cam were located.

It does not include the photographs discussed by the correspondents. Their precise content therefore cannot be independently examined from EFTA02335546.

It does not provide complete email addresses, attachment metadata, routing information, or a full technical header.

It does not independently prove that “G. Max” is Ghislaine Maxwell solely from the abbreviated sender field. That identification rests on the document’s archival context and corroborating correspondence.

Document Context

EFTA02335546 is a one page reproduction of a nested email chain released through the Department of Justice Epstein Library. The page carries the internal Bates number EFTA_R1_01282950.

The visible original message is attributed to “G. Max” and displays a sent time of 6:56 PM on Monday, January 21, 2002. It is addressed to Philip Levine and has no substantive subject line.

Within the quoted chain, a message attributed to Philip Levine displays a time of 6:37 PM on January 21, 2002, with a time zone notation of minus 0500. That message responds to the earlier discussion about Baron and the photographs.

The displayed clock times do not produce a straightforward chronological sequence because Levine’s quoted response appears earlier by the clock than Maxwell’s displayed original message. Possible explanations include a malformed header, conversion during collection, differing system settings, or incomplete preservation. The page alone does not resolve the discrepancy.

The uppermost Maxwell reply does not display a separate sent time in the reproduced portion. The order of the nested text indicates that it followed Levine’s message, but researchers should not assign an exact time without the original electronic record.

The conversation is written in an informal and anthropomorphic style. Maxwell describes the dog as romantically “unfaithful,” while Levine narrates the dog’s mounting behavior as evidence that Baron is growing up. This is a common form of playful language about pets, although the wording is explicit.

Broader reporting confirms that Levine and Maxwell exchanged personal correspondence over an extended period. WLRN’s review of the released records describes a larger body of correspondence involving Levine, Maxwell, and Epstein. That later reporting provides relationship context, but it does not change the limited subject or evidentiary meaning of this particular email.

Levine later served as mayor of Miami Beach from 2013 through 2017. He was not mayor when this email was written in 2002. Referring to him as mayor at the time of the exchange would therefore be chronologically inaccurate.

People and Entities Named

“G. Max”

The abbreviated sender name used on the released page. The archival context, “Gx” signoff, document classification, and connected correspondence support identifying the sender as Ghislaine Maxwell. The visible page does not print her complete name or email address.

Philip Levine

The recipient of Maxwell’s initial message and the author of the quoted response. Levine is a businessman who later served as mayor of Miami Beach. The document demonstrates direct personal correspondence with Maxwell but does not accuse Levine of wrongdoing.

Baron

A male dog discussed throughout the exchange. Baron is described as holding his bladder, urinating in response to perceived threats, mounting Cam, and “growing up.” His breed, age, location, and ownership are not identified.

Cam

An individual described with female pronouns and said to be the same size as Baron. Context strongly suggests that Cam is another dog or animal. The document does not establish Cam’s complete name, breed, age, or owner.

Fisher

An unidentified reference in Levine’s statement that Baron held his bladder until dinner at Fisher. The record does not establish whether Fisher is a person, household, restaurant, or location.

United States Department of Justice

The federal agency that released the record as part of the Epstein Files disclosure collection.

Chronology

Before the preserved exchange, photographs of Baron with another female animal were apparently taken and sent to Maxwell.
A message attributed to “G. Max” displays a sent time of 6:56 PM on January 21, 2002. Maxwell jokingly complains that the photographs show Baron being “unfaithful” and asks whether he urinated on the other animal.
A quoted message attributed to Philip Levine displays a time of 6:37 PM on the same date. Levine reports that Baron held his bladder through the night, then describes Baron mounting Cam on Levine’s bed.
Levine says Cam is the same size as Baron and concludes that Baron is growing up.
In the uppermost reply, Maxwell tells Levine to stop and writes that her “jealous quodlibet” is already full.
The visible clock times are inconsistent with the apparent conversational order. The released page does not provide enough technical information to reconstruct the precise transmission sequence.
The document was later preserved with Bates number EFTA_R1_01282950 and released as EFTA02335546 in Department of Justice Data Set 11.

Key Excerpts

Maxwell’s first visible message states:

“How could you send me pictures of Baron being unfaithful w/another women? I am devastated.”

She then asks:

“Tell me he did not pee on her too.”

Maxwell connects that question to her interpretation of Baron’s behavior:

“At least if he did not do that I know that he does not feel threatened so I still hold pride of place”

Levine writes:

“He actually held his bladder all night until dinner at Fisher…”

Levine then describes Baron’s behavior with Cam:

“Although he jumped on Cam the other night and seriously tried fucking her on my bed…Big time humping!!!She is his size…”

He concludes:

“The Baron is growing up!”

Maxwell’s final visible response reads:

“Stop it. My jealous quodlibet (look it up in the dictionary if you have not used this word before) is already full”

The spelling, punctuation, capitalization, spacing, and grammatical errors in these excerpts follow the released document.

Related Evidence

The primary record is available through the EFTA02335546 document viewer.

The existing EpsteinWiki entry for EFTA02335546 provides the current article location and should be replaced with this corrected evidence analysis.

The Ghislaine Maxwell profile provides biographical, legal, and documentary context for the person identified as “G. Max.”

The Philip Levine profile provides broader context for Levine and his appearances in the released records.

The Epstein social network archive can be used to compare this personal exchange with communications involving other people in the broader document collection.

The Epstein Email Archive provides access to additional correspondence that may help establish the length, frequency, and character of communication among the people appearing in these records.

WLRN’s report, Former Miami Beach Mayor Called Jeffrey Epstein His Friend, According to New DOJ Release, reviews additional correspondence involving Levine, Maxwell, and Epstein. Those separate communications should be assessed on their own facts and should not be treated as content contained in EFTA02335546.

Questions for Investigators

Do the original electronic records retain the photographs referenced by Maxwell?
Were the photographs removed before disclosure, omitted during printing, or preserved under another EFTA number?
Who owned Baron, and who was responsible for his daily care in January 2002?
Was Cam another dog, and can her identity be confirmed through related correspondence or photograph metadata?
What person, residence, restaurant, or event did Levine mean by “Fisher”?
Where were Baron and Cam when the reported behavior occurred?
Why does Levine’s quoted response display an earlier time than Maxwell’s apparent original message?
Do the original headers contain time zone information that would resolve the apparent sequence problem?
What email addresses were hidden or removed from the released reproduction?
Does the archive contain a preceding message through which Levine transmitted the photographs?
Are there other emails about Baron that establish his breed, age, ownership, travel, or residences?
Does Maxwell use “quodlibet” in other correspondence in a way that clarifies its intended private meaning?
Can related messages independently confirm that “G. Max” in this chain was Ghislaine Maxwell?
What was the duration and frequency of direct communication between Maxwell and Levine during this period?
Are complete native files available for forensic review, including attachments, routing data, and message identifiers?

Sources

EFTA02335546 Download

PostedFebruary 20, 2026