Jeffrey Epstein’s Unredacted Sex Offender Registration Asset and Internet Inventory
A five page attachment to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex offender registration form documents the vehicles, boats, aircraft, telephone infrastructure, email addresses, websites, social media profiles, messaging accounts, and online reputation management profiles disclosed on his behalf.
The document begins at EFTA00521412 and continues through EFTA00521416. It is titled Attachment to Sexual Offender Registration Form, Jeffrey Epstein, Automobiles, Boats, Aircraft, Telephone Numbers, Email Addresses, and Internet Related Information.
The inventory provides an unusually detailed view of the physical and digital infrastructure surrounding Epstein after his 2008 conviction. It identifies assets associated with his properties in New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the United States Virgin Islands. It also acknowledges that Epstein hired online reputation management companies to create websites, blogs, directory listings, and social profiles promoting his scientific and philanthropic activities.
The document does not identify its date or filing jurisdiction on its face. However, its inclusion of 2017 vehicles establishes that this version could not have been prepared before 2017.
Document Snapshot
Document title: Attachment to Sexual Offender Registration Form
Registered person: Jeffrey Epstein
Evidence range: EFTA00521412 through EFTA00521416
Total pages: Five
Automobiles disclosed: 15
Boats and personal watercraft disclosed: 10
Aircraft disclosed: Four
Telephone lines disclosed: More than 80 landlines, staff lines, fax lines, cellular numbers, and wireless access numbers
Email addresses disclosed: 11
Websites disclosed: Six
Twitter accounts disclosed: Two
Instagram accounts disclosed: Two
Messaging services disclosed: FaceTime, Signal, Confide, WhatsApp, and Kik
Other online accounts: Dozens of business directories, social networks, publishing services, reputation profiles, and foundation listings
Why Epstein Had to Register
Epstein pleaded guilty in Florida in 2008 to offenses that included procuring a person under 18 for prostitution. The conviction required him to register as a sex offender in jurisdictions where he maintained residences.
New York classified Epstein as a Level Three sex offender, the state’s highest risk classification. In People v. Epstein, the New York Appellate Division unanimously affirmed that classification on November 17, 2011.
Epstein’s attorneys argued that his primary residence was in the United States Virgin Islands and that his Manhattan property was a secondary residence. Judge Ruth Pickholz rejected the argument that registration requirements should be reduced because Epstein would otherwise have to return to New York for regular verification.
The newly released inventory demonstrates how complicated Epstein’s registration disclosures had become. His property network extended across several jurisdictions and included vehicles, watercraft, aircraft, communications systems, websites, and accounts managed by multiple service providers.
The Fifteen Automobiles
The first page, EFTA00521412, lists 15 automobiles associated with Epstein’s properties.
The vehicles included Chevrolet Suburbans, GMC Yukon Denalis, a Cadillac Escalade, a Mercedes Benz S500, a Range Rover, a Hummer H2, a Ford Expedition, a Dodge Caravan, a Chevrolet Express van, and a 2017 Bentley Mulsanne EWB.
Most were black. The registration locations included New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the United States Virgin Islands.
Several vehicles were expressly associated with Little Saint James, identified in the property column as “LSJ.” Others were assigned to Epstein’s residences in New Mexico, Florida, and New York.
The inventory contains vehicle identification numbers and license plate information. Those identifiers are preserved in the underlying evidence file but are not repeated here because the historically important point is the scale and geographic distribution of the vehicle network.
The concentration of large black sport utility vehicles is consistent with an operation designed to transport Epstein, employees, guests, and supplies between airports, residences, docks, and other locations.
The document alone does not establish who used any particular vehicle or what occurred during an individual trip.
The Little Saint James Boat Fleet
The same registration attachment lists 10 boats and personal watercraft associated with Little Saint James.
The disclosed fleet included a 35 foot Ribtec named Nana, two Yamaha personal watercraft, a 31 foot Cape Horn identified as PRD, a 36 foot Procat named Little C, a 73 foot barge identified as Miss Ava or Big N, a Bombardier Sea Doo, a 34 foot Sportis vessel named Little S, a Pursuit vessel, and a 41 foot Nautica rigid inflatable boat.
The listing includes registration numbers and hull identification numbers for each vessel.
This fleet is significant because Little Saint James was accessible by water as well as by helicopter. Boats were necessary for transporting people, luggage, equipment, construction materials, food, fuel, and other supplies between St. Thomas and the island.
The registration record establishes the existence of the vessels and their association with the island. It does not establish the passenger history of any individual boat.
Epstein’s Four Aircraft
The registration form identifies four aircraft:
Boeing 727: Registration N908JE
Bell 430 helicopter: Registration N331JE
Gulfstream G IV: Registration N120JE
Gulfstream G550: Registration N212JE
The aircraft section also identifies airports and heliports used in connection with Epstein’s properties.
For the Virgin Islands, the document names Cyril E. King Airport in St. Thomas.
For Florida, it identifies Palm Beach International Airport and Boca Raton Airport.
For New Mexico, it lists Santa Fe Municipal Airport and Albuquerque International Sunport.
For the New York area, it names John F. Kennedy International Airport, Newark Liberty International Airport, Teterboro Airport, Long Island MacArthur Airport, Stewart International Airport, the East 34th Street Heliport, the Wall Street Heliport, and the West 30th Street Heliport.
These aircraft should be reviewed alongside the Epstein flight logs and flight manifests. Registration records establish the aircraft associated with Epstein, while flight records can document particular movements, dates, crew members, and passengers.
Appearance on a flight record does not by itself establish knowledge of or participation in criminal activity.
A Large Communications Infrastructure
Pages EFTA00521412 and EFTA00521413 document a large network of telephone lines assigned to Epstein and his staff.
Little Saint James alone had approximately 50 listed telephone lines. The inventory separates lines described as “JEE lines” from staff lines.
Additional telephone and fax numbers were associated with Epstein’s properties in Florida, New Mexico, and New York.
The scale of the telephone system suggests that Epstein’s properties operated through a substantial administrative and household infrastructure. The lines could support staff coordination, property management, security, transportation, guest arrangements, construction, and personal communications.
The document does not identify the person assigned to every staff line. It also does not provide call records. Telephone numbers establish communications infrastructure, while subscriber records and call detail records are required to determine actual use.
Cellular and Wireless Accounts
The inventory identifies a cellular telephone number associated with several communications services.
The same number was listed for FaceTime, Signal, Confide, and WhatsApp. The document also listed a Kik account connected to Epstein’s active Gmail address.
Several wireless access or hotspot numbers appear in the filing, including numbers associated with the Virgin Islands and New Mexico.
This section is important because it shows that Epstein’s registration disclosure extended beyond conventional telephone lines. It included encrypted or internet based communications services that could operate across multiple devices and jurisdictions.
The record does not include message contents, passwords, contact lists, or proof that a particular person sent an individual message.
The Eleven Disclosed Email Addresses
Page EFTA00521414 identifies 11 email addresses created for Epstein or in connection with online accounts concerning him.
The addresses listed were:
The explanatory note distinguishes between accounts Epstein personally used and accounts created for other purposes.
According to the document, jeevacation@gmail.com was the only address on the list actively used by Epstein when the form was prepared.
The document states that jeeitunes@gmail.com was created solely to establish credentials for an Apple iTunes account.
It further states that some remaining addresses were no longer used by Epstein or had been created by online reputation management companies for websites, blogs, social accounts, and promotional content concerning him.
Subsequent document releases confirm that jeevacation@gmail.com became one of Epstein’s principal email accounts. The searchable Epstein Data email archive contains extensive correspondence connected to that address.
The address jeeproject@yahoo.com is also historically important. It appears in older correspondence and released account materials connected to Epstein’s activities before and during the Palm Beach investigation.
The Six Disclosed Websites
The registration attachment identifies six websites:
jeffreyepstein93.wordpress.com
The document states that independent online reputation management companies created the sites after being hired by Epstein.
According to the filing, the websites promoted content concerning Epstein’s business, scientific, and philanthropic activities. The document claims Epstein did not personally operate the sites, manage them, publish their content, or exercise editorial control.
That statement should be read precisely. The document acknowledges that Epstein hired the companies responsible for creating the material. Therefore, even if outside providers performed the technical work, the sites were part of a paid reputation management effort commissioned for Epstein’s benefit.
The filing says operations had been permanently discontinued for most of the websites and that service providers’ rights to them had been or were being terminated.
It identifies two exceptions. According to the form, the WordPress and Blogspot sites had been created by reputation management providers whom Epstein could no longer contact. The filing says no new material had appeared on those sites since 2012, but Epstein and his newer reputation advisers allegedly lacked the credentials required to close them.
The Importance of JeffreyEpstein.net
The domain jeffreyepstein.net is especially significant to the history of EpsteinWiki.
The document establishes that the domain was once included in Epstein’s official sex offender registration disclosures as part of the online reputation network created on his behalf.
The domain later left Epstein’s control. A volunteer eventually acquired it for the EpsteinWiki project, transforming a former reputation management asset into a public research and accountability resource.
That change represents a striking reversal. A domain once connected to efforts to promote Epstein’s image is now associated with preserving evidence about his crimes, properties, finances, associates, institutional protection, and survivors.
The domain’s historical registration should be investigated through archived web captures, registrar records, Domain Name System history, and evidence identifying the reputation management companies responsible for its earlier content.
Twitter and Instagram Accounts
The filing lists two Twitter screen names:
jeffrey_epstein
jeffreyepstein1
It also lists two Instagram identities:
jeeproject
Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation
The registration statement says use of the Twitter and Instagram accounts had been permanently discontinued.
It further claims that reputation management providers had closed or were attempting to close the accounts and that Epstein was not responsible for any later content appearing under those identities.
Once again, this language should not be confused with a claim that the profiles were unrelated to Epstein. The form explicitly states that the accounts were created or managed by companies he hired to publish content concerning him.
The Online Reputation Management Network
Pages EFTA00521415 and EFTA00521416 contain the most revealing section of the attachment.
They list dozens of internet accounts, profiles, business directories, article services, foundation directories, social networks, and website hosts used to distribute information about Epstein or the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation.
The platforms included AboutUs, Blogspot, BrandYourself, Crunchbase, Delicious, Digg, Flickr, Forbes, Gather, GoDaddy, Google profiles, Google Maps, GrantWatch, Indeed, Klout, LinkedIn, Live, Myspace, Patch, Philanthropy.com, Photobucket, Pinterest, PR.com, SlideShare, StumbleUpon, Vimeo, Wikipedia, and numerous local business directories.
Many profiles used the name Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation. Others used Jeffrey Epstein, The Jeffrey Epstein Foundation, or variations of those names.
The document states that independent reputation management providers created, administered, operated, and managed these accounts.
It further states that Epstein did not exercise direct administrative, operational, editorial, or managerial control over them.
However, the providers were hired by Epstein to publish favorable material concerning his business, scientific, and philanthropic activities. The filing therefore documents a coordinated reputation management system, even while attempting to distance Epstein from the individual acts of creating and maintaining each profile.
Scientific and Philanthropic Image Building
Many of the disclosed profiles emphasized the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation and Epstein’s claimed support for science, technology, education, and philanthropy.
The use of foundation directories, grant listings, science profiles, article services, local business directories, and social networks increased the volume of favorable material associated with Epstein’s name.
This strategy could influence search results by creating numerous pages that repeated similar descriptions of Epstein as a financier, scientist supporter, philanthropist, or foundation benefactor.
The registration attachment does not identify every company or individual responsible for the campaign. It also does not establish who wrote each article or profile.
However, it directly acknowledges that Epstein hired outside providers to create content about his scientific and philanthropic activities. That admission is primary evidence of a coordinated reputation management operation.
Why the Repetition Mattered
Online reputation campaigns often rely on repetition across many platforms.
A foundation profile on one site may be repeated in a business directory, blog post, social network, press release archive, image service, and search profile. Even when the pages contain little original information, their combined presence can dominate search results.
The Epstein registration inventory shows this pattern across dozens of services.
The strategy appears designed to create an extensive online footprint connecting Epstein’s name to science and philanthropy rather than his conviction and the accounts of survivors.
The document does not prove that every favorable article about Epstein came from the disclosed campaign. Each item must be examined individually. However, it provides a roadmap for identifying accounts that warrant deeper archival investigation.
An Earlier Version of the Inventory
A separate version of the registration attachment appears in the Epstein Data archive as EFTA01086391.
That version contains a similar title and many of the same categories. However, its vehicle and aircraft information differs from the five page version beginning at EFTA00521412.
For example, the separate version lists different luxury vehicles, including a 2006 Bentley Arnage and a 2016 Mercedes Maybach. The later inventory includes a 2017 Bentley Mulsanne and additional vehicle changes.
These differences suggest that the registration attachment was updated over time as Epstein acquired, disposed of, reassigned, or replaced assets.
The versions should not be merged into a single undated list without explanation. Each represents the information disclosed at a particular but presently unidentified point in the registration process.
What the Document Establishes
The registration attachment establishes that Epstein disclosed a substantial collection of vehicles, vessels, aircraft, telephone lines, email addresses, websites, social accounts, and online profiles.
It establishes that numerous assets were distributed across New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the United States Virgin Islands.
It establishes that Epstein’s properties required a large communications and transportation infrastructure.
It establishes that Epstein hired online reputation management companies to create and distribute favorable content about his business, scientific, and philanthropic activities.
It establishes that jeevacation@gmail.com was identified as his active email address when this version of the form was prepared.
It establishes that six websites, including jeffreyepstein.net, were disclosed as part of his internet related information.
What the Document Does Not Establish
The registration attachment does not identify who used every vehicle, vessel, aircraft, telephone line, email account, or social profile.
It does not provide passenger manifests, call records, message contents, passwords, website contracts, invoices, or complete ownership histories.
It does not prove that every listed asset was used in criminal conduct.
It does not identify the date or filing jurisdiction on its face.
It does not independently verify Epstein’s claims that he lacked editorial control over the content created by companies he hired.
It does not identify every former owner, current owner, administrator, or registrant of the listed domains.
These questions require comparison with corporate records, financial documents, registrar histories, archived websites, communications records, flight logs, property records, and testimony.
Key Takeaways
The filing maps Epstein’s physical infrastructure
The document identifies vehicles, boats, aircraft, airports, telephone systems, and communication services associated with his properties across four jurisdictions.
Little Saint James had extensive transportation and telephone resources
The island was supported by boats, personal watercraft, large vehicles, aircraft access, and approximately 50 telephone lines.
Epstein disclosed four aircraft
The listed aircraft were the Boeing 727 N908JE, Bell 430 helicopter N331JE, Gulfstream G IV N120JE, and Gulfstream G550 N212JE.
Jeevacation was identified as the active email account
The form states that jeevacation@gmail.com was the only listed address actively used by Epstein at the time.
The document acknowledges paid reputation management
Epstein’s own registration attachment states that outside companies were hired to create websites, blogs, profiles, and promotional content about him.
The online campaign emphasized science and philanthropy
Many accounts promoted Epstein or the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation through scientific, philanthropic, grant, foundation, and business platforms.
JeffreyEpstein.net was part of the disclosed network
The domain now associated with the EpsteinWiki project once appeared in Epstein’s sex offender registration disclosure as a website created through his reputation management operation.
The registration form should be treated as a roadmap
Every vehicle, aircraft, vessel, domain, account, profile, and service provider can be investigated through additional records.
Why This Document Matters
This registration attachment connects Epstein’s physical world to his digital one.
The vehicles, boats, aircraft, airports, and telephone lines reveal the operational scale of his properties. The websites, social accounts, directory listings, blogs, and foundation profiles reveal an organized effort to influence how the public encountered his name online.
Most importantly, the document contains Epstein’s own acknowledgment that he paid independent service providers to create content emphasizing his scientific and philanthropic activities.
That admission provides critical context for researchers reviewing favorable articles, biographies, foundation listings, and profiles published after his conviction. Some of those pages may not represent independent editorial coverage. They may be products of a coordinated reputation management campaign.
The document should therefore be preserved not simply as a sex offender registration attachment, but as a primary evidence map of Epstein’s transportation network, communications infrastructure, digital identities, and reputation laundering operation.
Related EpsteinWiki Articles
Epstein Address Books and Contact Records
2008 Non Prosecution Agreement
Evidence and Sources
- EFTA00521412: Vehicles, Boats, Aircraft, Airports, and Little Saint James Telephone Lines
- EFTA00521413: Additional Telephone, Cellular, Fax, and Wireless Numbers
- EFTA00521414: Email Addresses, Websites, Social Accounts, and Messaging Services
- EFTA00521415: Online Reputation Management Accounts and Profiles
- EFTA00521416: Additional Reputation Management and Directory Accounts
- EFTA01086391: Separate Version of the Sex Offender Registration Attachment
- People v. Epstein, 2011 New York Appellate Decision
- New York Courts Sex Offender Registry Information
- New York State Sex Offender Registry Information
- Epstein Data Search for Jeevacation Gmail Records
- Epstein Data Search for Jeffrey Epstein Online Reputation Management