Sleuth Report: What Virginia Giuffre’s FBI Interview Actually Names
A newly highlighted series of FBI records answers an important question about the released Epstein files: Did redactions conceal every person Virginia Giuffre identified?
They did not.
The 13-page FBI interview report beginning at EFTA01249101 names Glenn Dubin, Leslie Wexner, Jean Luc Brunel, and Prince Andrew. Its Bates range is EFTA01249101–EFTA01249113.
The records contain allegations, witness statements, and investigative summaries. A name appearing in an FBI record does not establish guilt. Each claim must be identified as an allegation unless supported by a conviction, admission, or judicial finding.
The documents also show why researchers must examine each page instead of assuming that a protective order removed every significant name.
This report follows a lead published by Greg Conners on August 5, 2026. Conners disclosed that the answer was generated by Epstein Data’s Edie system. That Q&A is a discovery aid, not independent corroboration; the page references below have been checked against the released scan.
Report Snapshot
Virginia Giuffre identified Glenn Dubin in connection with an alleged sexual encounter when she was 16.
Giuffre said she provided Leslie Wexner with an erotic massage in New York.
She described Jean Luc Brunel as a modeling agent who brought young women and girls to Epstein.
She gave investigators detailed accounts of alleged sexual encounters with Prince Andrew.
The records do not name Ehud Barak, Tom Pritzker, or Leon Black within this particular interview sequence.
Several unknown people remain identified only by first names, job descriptions, or redacted information.
Understanding the FBI Interview
The FD-302 records an interview conducted on March 17, 2011. This copy gives March 31, 2011 as its transcription date. The surname GIUFFRE is visible on PDF page 2, Bates EFTA01249102.
The pages carry protective order markings. Those markings restrict the handling or disclosure of protected material. They do not mean that every name on every page was redacted.
Some information remains concealed. However, several significant names are plainly visible.
The documents should be read as investigative records, not criminal verdicts. They preserve what Giuffre told investigators. They do not demonstrate that every allegation was independently proven.
Kait Justice’s September 9, 2026 investigation compares versions of this interview with the FBI serial records. The copy beginning EFTA00269896 records the same March 17, 2011 interview but has twelve pages and a later entry date. Different pagination, transcription dates, entry dates, or release identifiers should not turn copies of one account into independent witnesses.
For more background about Giuffre and the structure she described, read the EpsteinWiki reports on Virginia Giuffre and the Epstein network victim pipeline.
Glenn Dubin
Giuffre identified financier Glenn Dubin on PDF page 4, Bates EFTA01249104. The account continues on page 5, Bates EFTA01249105.
The FBI summary states that Giuffre described performing sexual acts with Dubin. She said she was 16 at the time. According to the record, Giuffre also said that Dubin paid her and that Epstein paid her again the following day.
The age, payment, and sexual-conduct statements above are Giuffre’s allegations as recorded by the interviewing agents, not findings that the conduct occurred.
A later FBI presentation, EFTA01656198, PDF page 18, Bates EFTA01656215, summarizes an allegation that Maxwell instructed a witness to massage Dubin and do what she did for Epstein. The witness’s name is redacted on that slide. The slide alone does not identify her as Giuffre or provide independent corroboration of the alleged conduct.
View the later presentation’s Dubin allegation, page 18
Dubin denied Giuffre’s allegations, as reported by William D. Cohan in Vanity Fair.
No criminal conviction or judicial finding established that Dubin committed the conduct Giuffre described. The FBI record nevertheless confirms that she identified him directly during the investigation.
Leslie Wexner
In EFTA01249107 (PDF page 7), Giuffre told investigators that she provided an erotic massage to Leslie Wexner in New York.
The summary states that Epstein and Wexner were close friends who had regular contact. It also records Giuffre describing Wexner as a “creep.”
The document does not provide the same level of detail found in the allegation involving Dubin. It also does not describe force, payment, or a completed sexual act.
A second record contains Giuffre’s response when asked whether Wexner possessed relevant information. She said she believed he did, but that she did not believe he would tell the truth.
View the additional record concerning Leslie Wexner
Wexner has said that he was unaware of Epstein’s criminal activity and severed his relationship with Epstein after discovering financial misconduct.
Giuffre’s statement is evidence that she identified Wexner during an FBI interview. It is not a criminal finding against him.
Jean Luc Brunel
In EFTA01249106 (PDF page 6), Giuffre described Jean Luc Brunel as a modeling recruiter who was frequently around Epstein.
According to the FBI summary, Giuffre said Brunel brought girls to Epstein. She observed that many spoke limited English and appeared very young. She estimated that some were approximately 16 years old.
This section is especially important because it describes an alleged recruitment method. The account involves the modeling industry, international travel, language barriers, and young people whose vulnerability may have made them easier to control.
Brunel was later investigated in France over allegations involving sexual abuse and the trafficking of minors. He denied wrongdoing and died in custody in 2022 before his case could proceed to trial.
The interview does not merely show that Giuffre knew Brunel. It preserves her description of the function she believed he performed within Epstein’s network.
For related context, see the EpsteinWiki report on Jeffrey Epstein’s access to models and modeling agencies.
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew appears repeatedly in the interview records.
In EFTA01249110 (PDF page 10), Giuffre described an evening in London during which Prince Andrew allegedly touched her at a nightclub before a sexual encounter at Ghislaine Maxwell’s home.
In EFTA01249113 (PDF page 13), investigators compared Giuffre’s travel history with the timing of her alleged encounters with Andrew.
The record states that a January travel entry corresponded with her return from London after the first alleged encounter. An April entry reportedly placed her back in the United States shortly before another alleged encounter.
This is significant because the investigators were not recording an allegation in isolation. They were examining travel records that might support or challenge Giuffre’s timeline.
Prince Andrew repeatedly denied Giuffre’s allegations. She later filed a civil lawsuit against him in federal court.
The parties settled that lawsuit in 2022. Andrew made no admission of liability. The settlement statement recognized Giuffre as an established victim of abuse and announced that Andrew would make a substantial donation to her charity.
The settlement ended the civil case without a trial or judicial determination of whether Giuffre’s allegations against Andrew were true.
The Names That Do Not Appear in This Interview
The question submitted to Epstein Data also asked about Ehud Barak, Tom Pritzker, and Leon Black.
Those names do not appear in the identified 13-page interview report, Bates EFTA01249101–EFTA01249113.
Other Epstein records and litigation materials may mention those men. Their absence from this specific document does not prove that Giuffre never discussed them elsewhere.
It only means researchers should not cite this interview sequence as evidence that she named them during this particular interview.
This distinction prevents separate documents, witnesses, and allegations from being improperly merged.
People Whose Identities Remain Unclear
The interview includes people identified with incomplete names or occupational descriptions.
A pilot named Larry appears in EFTA01249109 (PDF page 9). His surname is not provided.
A chef named Adam and an unidentified New York driver appear in EFTA01249111 (PDF page 11).
The phrase “last name unknown” does not necessarily indicate a government redaction. It can mean that the witness or interviewer did not know or record the person’s complete name.
Researchers should not assign identities to these people without corroborating employment records, travel records, address books, photographs, or additional testimony.
Page and Bates Number Guide
The original Q&A contains both malformed document numbers and page references that do not match this 13-page PDF. PDF page numbers below are one-based; Bates numbers are the identifiers printed at the bottom of each scanned page.
The London nightclub and sexual-encounter account appears on PDF page 10, Bates EFTA01249110. The travel-record comparison is on page 13, Bates EFTA01249113.
The pilot reference appears on PDF page 9, Bates EFTA01249109.
The chef and driver references appear on PDF page 11, Bates EFTA01249111.
These distinctions matter because a valid Bates number can still point to the wrong passage, and copies of the same interview may have different pagination.
What the Protective Order Means
The phrase “subject to protective order” appears across the interview records.
A protective order can govern how information obtained through litigation or investigation is stored, disclosed, or used. It does not automatically remove every name from a document.
In this case, important names remain visible despite the protective order markings.
Researchers should distinguish three separate conditions.
A visible name can be read and evaluated.
A redacted name cannot be identified from that passage alone.
An incomplete name marked as unknown may reflect missing information rather than deliberate concealment.
Treating all three conditions as the same would distort the record.
What the Records Establish
The records establish that Giuffre named Glenn Dubin, Leslie Wexner, Jean Luc Brunel, and Prince Andrew during the documented interview.
They establish that she gave investigators specific descriptions of alleged conduct and network activity.
They establish that investigators examined travel information while reviewing her Prince Andrew allegations.
They establish that some significant names remained visible despite protective order markings.
They also establish that several other people remained unidentified or only partially identified.
What the Records Do Not Establish
The records do not prove every allegation contained within them.
They do not show that every named person was charged with a crime.
They do not establish that every person mentioned was an Epstein coconspirator.
They do not name Ehud Barak, Tom Pritzker, or Leon Black within this interview sequence.
They do not establish the identities of Larry, Adam, or Epstein’s unnamed New York driver.
They should not be described as a verified list of perpetrators without explaining the nature and legal status of each allegation.
Key Takeaways
The interview is not completely redacted. Several important names and allegations remain visible.
Giuffre directly identified Glenn Dubin and described alleged sexual conduct when she was 16. Dubin denied the allegation.
Giuffre said she gave Leslie Wexner an erotic massage and believed he possessed relevant information.
She described Jean Luc Brunel as someone who brought young women and girls to Epstein through the modeling world.
She provided detailed allegations concerning Prince Andrew. Andrew denied them and later settled Giuffre’s civil lawsuit without admitting liability.
Protective order markings do not mean that every name was removed.
Document numbers must be checked carefully. Several citations in the original report were missing a digit or linked to the wrong page.
The records preserve serious allegations that deserve examination. They are not substitutes for criminal charges, judicial findings, or independent corroboration.
Sources
- Greg Conners, Q&A Finding Perps in Epstein Files
- Kait Justice: comparing versions of Giuffre’s FBI interview
- FBI serial 251: twelve-page version of the March 17, 2011 interview
- Vanity Fair: Dubin’s denial of Giuffre’s allegations
- Beginning of Virginia Giuffre’s FBI interview sequence
- FBI interview: Dubin introduction, page 4 (Bates EFTA01249104); account continues on page 5 (EFTA01249105)
- FBI interview: Brunel, page 6 (Bates EFTA01249106)
- FBI interview: Wexner, page 7 (Bates EFTA01249107)
- FBI interview: Larry, page 9 (Bates EFTA01249109)
- FBI interview: Andrew account, page 10 (Bates EFTA01249110)
- FBI interview: chef and driver, page 11 (Bates EFTA01249111)
- FBI interview: travel-record discussion, page 13 (Bates EFTA01249113)
- Final page of the FBI interview report, page 13 (Bates EFTA01249113)
- Later FBI presentation: allegation concerning Dubin, witness redacted, page 18
- Additional record concerning Leslie Wexner
- Associated Press report on Giuffre’s allegations and Prince Andrew settlement
- Report on the dismissal of Giuffre’s lawsuit following the settlement
- Report on Jean Luc Brunel’s detention, denials, and death