Skip to main content
Search
< All Topics
Print

Zorro Ranch Vendors, Contractors, Massage Therapists, and Shopping Records

Updated
ByEpsteinWiki

Snapshot

The New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission identifies construction firms, service providers, and massage practitioners connected to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch. Financial records and emails add payments, purchase requests, proposals, and deliveries. The commission says its accounting of ranch spending and contractors remains incomplete.

A business appearing in these records is not evidence that it knew about abuse. This article distinguishes completed work, documented payments, requests, proposals, and witness accounts.

Key Takeaways

  • Bradbury & Stamm Construction built the main residence. Other named firms performed or proposed electrical, mechanical, engineering, landscaping, and communications work.
  • Checks issued by Epstein’s ranch companies provide stronger evidence of a vendor relationship than a bid or proposed project.
  • Professional massage therapists and a reflexologist described working at the ranch. Their accounts must be kept separate from survivors’ accounts of coerced massages.
  • Ten Thousand Waves appears in account charges and in Brice Gordon’s account of therapist referrals. The spa disputes that it supplied or referred therapists to the ranch.
  • Shopping records establish individual orders and broad spending categories, but the available records do not identify every store used by ranch staff.

Ranch Companies That Paid the Bills

Zorro Development Corporation paid ranch operating expenses and capital improvements. Its records include checks, purchase requests, and service arrangements. Zorro Management LLC also paid ranch expenses in later years. These were Epstein controlled entities, not independent New Mexico vendors. Their records are routes to identifying outside suppliers.

The commission’s interim report says the available email archive begins in 2009 and its list of workers and contractors is incomplete. That limitation matters especially for the mansion’s construction and the ranch’s earlier years.

Builders, Trades, and Landscaping Businesses

Bradbury & Stamm Construction. The commission’s construction account identifies this company as the builder of the main residence and cites EFTA00686274 as underlying evidence. Its work is documented, but a complete list of subcontractors has not been established.

J. B. Henderson Construction. Correspondence examined by Epstein Data records that the company stopped work at Zorro Ranch in 2013 over unpaid invoices. Brice Gordon forwarded the issue to Richard Kahn. The record documents work and a payment dispute, without establishing the complete scope or final resolution.

RMC Electric Company. Zorro Development’s check record shows a $321 payment dated June 29, 2016 to the Albuquerque company, with an invoice number in the memo. Other correspondence concerns proposed work on a microwave dish support.

Molzen Corbin. The same check run shows a $1,441.31 payment dated June 21, 2016 to the Albuquerque firm for invoice 14357. The invoice itself should be used to determine the exact service.

Horizon Mechanical Systems. A June 2016 check paid the Moriarty company $859.41 and identified two invoices. Additional payment records name the company in later work.

Aspen Landscaping LLC. A February 2014 check request names the Santa Fe company and requests $3,781.58. The request establishes that ranch staff sought payment; the cleared check and underlying invoice are needed to verify the final transaction and work.

EcoScapes. A ranch maintenance proposal sets out estimated weekly costs for grounds work near the main house in 2013 and 2014. It documents a bid, while the signed agreement and payments remain to be confirmed.

Stone Gate Turf & Ranch. A Zorro Management check dated March 24, 2017 paid this business $1,386. The check establishes a payment, but the precise goods or services require the invoice.

The commission’s property review describes continuing construction and maintenance from 1994 through 2019. These named companies therefore represent documented portions of a larger contractor history.

Communications, Internet, and Entertainment Contractors

Advanced Communications and Electronics. The commission’s communications review identifies Richard Boltz of this Albuquerque company as designing and installing a relay system beginning in 2013. Its cited records include EFTA01966493, EFTA01963857, EFTA01965094, and EFTA02020654.

Sprint and Time Warner. EFTA02006931 is cited by the commission for a Sprint T1 connection serving the ranch by 2010 and a Time Warner price comparison. A price comparison should not be counted as proof that a proposed replacement service was purchased.

CenturyLink. Engineering correspondence in EFTA01780693 addresses fiber access for a proposed connection near Sandia Crest in 2016. The correspondence does not, by itself, establish completion of the proposed ranch connection.

Future Tech. A proposal in EFTA01802844 compares communications links and offers to design and install a system. The proposal documents contact, while completed installation and the company’s location require confirmation.

Paradise Village. An August 2013 email says Brice Gordon forwarded an estimate from this Albuquerque business for the ranch movie room. An estimate does not establish that Paradise Village won the work.

Western Systems. That same bidding email says Western Systems was expected to submit a movie room bid. Later Zorro Management payment records also name Western Systems among check payees. The bid and payment should be matched to invoices before assigning a specific completed project.

Constellation Home Electronics. A 2014 project request names the company in proposed theater and great room upgrades. The form lists estimated labor and programming, but the final approved amount and completed scope need supporting payment records.

Massage Therapists and Reflexology

Ten Thousand Waves. Maxwell’s account records show an $805 charge to the Santa Fe spa in May 2005, while a second record shows a $471.23 charge in June 2006. These charges establish patronage.

Brice Gordon’s account in the commission report says ranch staff found professional massage therapists through Ten Thousand Waves or other referrals and used approximately five therapists. A spa spokesperson has disputed that Ten Thousand Waves provided or referred therapists to the ranch. The documented charges and the disputed referral claim should remain separate.

Professional massage therapist identified as Jane Doe 2. The interview record in EFTA00153855 describes a practitioner who said she began visiting the ranch in 1999 and received checks bearing an Epstein company’s name. She reported sessions with Epstein, Maxwell, and others. She also said sessions with Epstein became sexual and that she stopped working there after being presented with a nondisclosure agreement she declined to sign.

Unidentified reflexologist. The interview record beginning at EFTA00090036 concerns a practitioner who said she worked at the ranch between 1999 and 2008, making approximately thirty visits. Her name is redacted. She described her own sessions as professional and said she repeatedly refused a nondisclosure agreement.

Additional practitioners. The commission’s account of the reflexologist interview mentions another local practitioner who also worked as a psychotherapist, as well as a young woman the reflexologist was asked to train. The present records do not support publishing their identities or treating either person as a confirmed independent vendor.

Professional services must be distinguished from the abuse allegations. The Maxwell indictment in EFTA01659401 describes an unsolicited massage and encouragement to massage Epstein as part of alleged grooming of a minor in New Mexico. It does not identify an outside spa as a participant in that conduct.

Shopping, Deliveries, and Household Purchases

Amazon Marketplace. An order exchange in EFTA02099597 concerns a Yamaha keyboard power adapter and where it should be delivered. Related correspondence in EFTA02099903 discusses its expected arrival. These records establish an individual purchase and delivery exchange, not the ranch’s full online shopping history.

Landscaping and equipment orders. The Aspen Landscaping request and EcoScapes proposal show how staff documented anticipated property spending. A Zorro Development purchase request described by Epstein Data also sought a replacement wooden flagpole in 2009, with a quoted purchase price, shipping cost, and deposit. The supplier’s name should be checked against the underlying image before being added to the named vendor index.

Groceries and household goods. A household budget in EFTA01304421 contains categories for groceries, household goods, livestock supplies, fuel and repairs, electronics, flowers, and shipping. The categories demonstrate planned or recorded spending. Without the underlying transactions and correctly matched property columns, they cannot identify particular New Mexico stores or a reliable Zorro Ranch total.

Shopping with a minor visitor. The account in EFTA00162543 says Epstein and Maxwell took a minor visitor into town to shop during a 1996 ranch visit. The Maxwell indictment in EFTA01659401 also describes shopping as part of the alleged grooming conduct. Neither account identifies the stores or receipts. No merchant should be attached to that trip without additional evidence.

Evidence Appearances

What Remains Unknown

The public record does not yet provide a complete list of grocery stores, retailers, subcontractors, transport providers, massage practitioners, or businesses paid during the ranch’s earliest years. The commission’s interim report states that its accounting of construction, maintenance, payroll, and other ranch spending is incomplete.

A fuller register requires matching each payee across checks, card statements, invoices, purchase requests, and bank records. Each entry should record the date, amount, purchasing entity, goods or services, document number, and whether the transaction was merely proposed, requested, billed, or paid.

Sources

Tags:
Previous Zorro Ranch Photographs: A Frame by Frame Index of the Insurance Survey, Sale Gallery and Epstein Files
Next Jeffrey Epstein’s Aircraft Network: Ownership, Rentals, Charters, and Tail Numbers
Table of Contents