Skip to main content
Print

Epstein Video Evidence Index

Snapshot

FieldFinding
Index statusComplete through September 14, 2026, based on the publicly cataloged native video inventory
Principal subjectVideo connected to Jeffrey Epstein, his properties, criminal investigations, detention, associates, and related legal proceedings
Native video files identified3,385
DOJ datasets containing native videosDatasets 2, 8, 9, 10, and 11
Combined file sizeApproximately 39.23 GB
Cataloged durationAt least 715.4 hours
Files without a recorded duration314
Files cataloged as zero seconds1,067
Principal formatsAVI, MP4, MOV, M4V, WMV, VOB, TS, and 3GP
Largest dataset by video countDataset 9 with 2,132 files
Principal evidence sourcesDOJ Epstein Library, Epstein Data native file catalog, House Oversight releases, court exhibits, FBI records, and DOJ Inspector General materials
Main evidence categoriesSurveillance, law enforcement searches, interviews, depositions, property recordings, personal videos, detention footage, amusement ride footage, and congressional testimony
Central evidentiary valueDocuments locations, movements, property conditions, interviews, investigative activity, and detention facility operations
Central limitationA video’s presence in the files does not establish when it was recorded, who created it, whether every person is correctly identified, or whether it depicts criminal conduct
Survivor warningSome files may contain sensitive, exploitative, private, or survivor related material that should not be reproduced without a clear public interest purpose

The Epstein Video Evidence Index organizes native video files and video related records released through the Department of Justice, House Oversight Committee, court proceedings, law enforcement productions, and other public sources.

A structured catalog maintained through Epstein Data identifies 3,385 native video files across five DOJ datasets. The files collectively occupy approximately 39.23 GB. Their recorded duration fields total at least 715.4 hours, although the actual total may be higher because hundreds of files have missing or zero duration values.

The native inventory includes thousands of surveillance clips, lengthy detention recordings, interview footage, personal videos, property recordings, court exhibits, and files that remain unidentified beyond a number and technical description.

The index also includes records about video that was searched for, reviewed, seized, lost, not preserved, not released, or merely alleged to exist. Those administrative records are essential because the absence of a publicly playable file does not mean investigators never encountered or discussed it.

This index separates native evidence from television reports, documentaries, commentary videos, reconstructed footage, and online claims. Public reporting may provide context, but it is not the original evidence.


Scope of the Index

This index includes:

  1. Native video files released under EFTA identifiers.
  2. Native video files released under HOUSE_OVERSIGHT identifiers.
  3. Bureau of Prisons surveillance recordings.
  4. FBI and police search recordings.
  5. Law enforcement interview recordings.
  6. Videotaped depositions.
  7. Property surveillance and walkthrough footage.
  8. Videos recovered from devices or physical media.
  9. Video exhibits introduced in court.
  10. Government recordings of interviews and congressional proceedings.
  11. Records documenting missing, damaged, overwritten, or unavailable video.
  12. Claims about alleged video evidence when the underlying recording has not been produced.

This index does not classify every video as evidence of a crime. Many files may depict ordinary activity, empty spaces, exterior surveillance, news footage, social events, travel, animals, or unidentified scenes.


Native Video Inventory

The complete machine readable inventory is preserved through the Epstein Data native file catalog. That catalog is based on DOJ native file productions and structured research data maintained by R. Howard Stone’s Epstein Research Data project.

DatasetNative video filesPercentage of catalogRecorded durationCombined size
Dataset 21Less than 0.1 percent4.3 seconds1.4 MB
Dataset 841912.4 percentApproximately 412.4 hoursApproximately 9.55 GB
Dataset 92,13263.0 percentApproximately 279.9 hoursApproximately 16.01 GB
Dataset 1082924.5 percentApproximately 23.0 hoursApproximately 13.66 GB
Dataset 1140.1 percentApproximately 3.2 minutesApproximately 10.87 MB
Total3,385100 percentAt least 715.4 hoursApproximately 39.23 GB

These figures describe files categorized as video in the structured native file inventory. They do not include every television appearance, congressional livestream, documentary, or online video about Epstein.

The duration figures require caution. The catalog lists 314 video files without a duration and 1,067 files with a zero second duration. Some zero values may represent extremely short clips, broken metadata, damaged files, or files that could not be processed.


Video Formats

FormatFilesPercentage
AVI1,71150.5 percent
MP41,37240.5 percent
MOV2116.2 percent
M4V682.0 percent
WMV100.3 percent
VOB100.3 percent
TS20.1 percent
3GP1Less than 0.1 percent

The mixture of formats suggests that the collection contains material drawn from multiple devices, surveillance systems, phones, cameras, optical media, computer archives, and government evidence systems.

File format alone does not establish a recording’s origin. A converted MP4 file may have originated in another format, while a VOB file may have been extracted from a DVD structure.


Dataset 2 Video

Dataset 2 contains one identified native video.

DocumentFormatDurationDescription
EFTA00003212AVIApproximately 4.3 secondsShort video with a small amount of transcribed speech

The released placeholder and catalog description provide limited context. The file should not be assigned a subject, location, speaker, or evidentiary meaning without direct review.


Dataset 8 Videos

Dataset 8 contains 419 native video files. A substantial portion consists of Metropolitan Correctional Center surveillance footage associated with the investigation of Epstein’s detention and death.

Selected files include:

DocumentDurationCatalog description
EFTA00010707Approximately 2.4 minutesSilent MCC surveillance footage
EFTA00028842Approximately 12 secondsSilent MCC surveillance footage
EFTA00029995Approximately 21 secondsSilent MCC surveillance footage
EFTA00029996Approximately 8 secondsSilent MCC surveillance footage
EFTA00029997Approximately 18 secondsSilent MCC surveillance footage
EFTA00029998Approximately 19 secondsSilent MCC surveillance footage
EFTA00032989Approximately one hourSilent MCC surveillance footage
EFTA00032990Approximately one hourSilent MCC surveillance footage
EFTA00032991Approximately one hourSilent MCC surveillance footage
EFTA00033003 through EFTA00033022Approximately one hour per fileExtended MCC surveillance sequence

Researchers should review the MCC files as a sequence. A single clip may show only seconds or minutes extracted from a larger timeline. Camera placement, time stamps, missing intervals, frame rates, and conversion history must be considered before drawing conclusions.

The released footage does not provide a direct view inside Epstein’s cell. The functioning camera documented a common area and access route near the Special Housing Unit.


Metropolitan Correctional Center Surveillance

The MCC video evidence is one of the most closely scrutinized parts of the Epstein record.

The DOJ Inspector General’s report states that the camera inside the tier where Epstein was housed transmitted a live feed but was not recording because of a disk failure. Available footage covered a common area outside the tier.

The Inspector General reported that the available video did not show correctional officers or other individuals approaching the Special Housing Unit tiers between approximately 10:40 p.m. on August 9, 2019, and approximately 6:30 a.m. on August 10.

That conclusion must be understood within the documented camera limitations. The video did not show Epstein’s cell interior, and nearly all cameras in or around the Special Housing Unit had stopped recording after a DVR failure.

DVR Systems and Extraction

An FBI technical email in EFTA01649187 describes two MCC DVR systems, each containing sixteen hard drives.

The communication states that DVR System 2 had experienced multiple drive failures. Two of the three camera feeds considered most relevant were attached to that system and were not recording when Epstein died.

The FBI planned to remove the failed system, attempt a drive reconstruction, export available video from the functioning system, and maintain control over the equipment room during installation of replacement equipment.

The email warned that some drives might be corrupted or encrypted because they were removed while the system was running.

An evidence report within EFTA01684602 documents DVR controllers, disk arrays, sixteen drive systems, archive drives, and LTO tape cartridges used to preserve MCC video.

Missing July 2019 Footage

A government letter in EFTA00017953 addresses requested footage from outside a cell for July 22 and July 23, 2019. The record states that the footage had been preserved under the wrong retention tier and was no longer available from the backup system.

EFTA00034725 contains a July 25, 2019 email chain concerning a preservation request.

EFTA00017955 contains additional government correspondence concerning the requested footage.

The absence of the July recording is a documented preservation failure. It does not establish what the missing footage would have shown.

Earlier DOJ OGR Footage

The EpsteinWiki detention facility video collection documents DOJ OGR files numbered 00022154 through 00022165. These consist of fixed camera detention footage released as federal evidence.


Dataset 9 Videos

Dataset 9 contains 2,132 native video files, representing 63 percent of the current native video catalog.

Many are described as silent surveillance footage at resolutions such as 320 by 240, 320 by 180, and 352 by 240. Other files appear to be short personal or device recordings.

The size and structure of Dataset 9 suggest that it contains multiple video groups rather than one continuous recording system.

One notable file is EFTA00277579, a VOB file for which the independent catalog reports a duration of approximately 26.5 hours. That unusually long duration may reflect DVD timing information, concatenated footage, or malformed metadata. It should not be described as a verified continuous 26.5 hour recording without direct technical examination.

The Dataset 9 collection requires additional work to identify:

  1. Which files belong to the same camera system.
  2. Which files are consecutive segments.
  3. Which files are duplicates or conversions.
  4. Which recordings contain reliable embedded time stamps.
  5. Which locations appear in the footage.
  6. Which recordings came from Epstein’s properties or seized devices.
  7. Which files were collected from unrelated sources.
  8. Which zero second files contain playable frames.

Dataset 10 Videos

Dataset 10 contains 829 native video files. It includes several publicly discussed investigative recordings.

DocumentDurationDescription
EFTA01600824Approximately two hoursVideo with a substantial speech transcript
EFTA01621008Approximately 3.4 hoursMOV file with no speech detected by the catalog
EFTA01648699Approximately 15 secondsShort vertical video identified as federal investigation footage
EFTA01648737Approximately 3 secondsShort vertical recording showing a redacted person moving on hands and knees
EFTA01683320Approximately 2.7 hoursSilent amusement ride surveillance footage
EFTA01683321Approximately 2.7 hoursCompanion amusement ride surveillance file
EFTA01683424Approximately 52 secondsFile labeled in the evidence archive as the “Man Girl Dog” video exhibit

The titles assigned to individual videos may derive from evidence inventories, filenames, or later archival descriptions. A title is not a substitute for direct review.

The EpsteinWiki page for EFTA01648737 documents the short recording without identifying the redacted person or assigning a motive.

The related DOJ Video Evidence page for EFTA01648737 reflects an earlier descriptive title. Because the person is redacted and age cannot be established from the public file alone, the more cautious description is preferred.

The EFTA01683320 amusement ride footage should be analyzed with its companion file, camera time stamps, location evidence, and related equipment records.

The title associated with EFTA01683424 should not be interpreted as proof of the identities, ages, relationships, or conduct of the people depicted.


Dataset 11 Videos

Dataset 11 contains four native video files.

DocumentFormatDurationCatalog description
EFTA02674462M4VApproximately 18 secondsShort video with transcribed speech
EFTA02698946M4VLess than one secondVery short video with no detected speech
EFTA02713876M4VApproximately 17 secondsVertical video with limited transcribed speech
EFTA02720005M4VApproximately 2.6 minutesVideo with a longer speech transcript

These files require individual content review before the speakers, locations, recording dates, or evidentiary significance can be described.


House Oversight Video Evidence

House Oversight productions contain native video files and property footage that are separate from the DOJ EFTA native file count.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026678 is a MOV file released in a House Oversight evidence production. The EpsteinWiki page for HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026678 documents its congressional provenance.

House Oversight also released property videos, deposition recordings, interview footage, and congressional testimony. Those records should be classified according to their original creator:

Video typeOriginal creatorPublic publisher
Estate supplied native fileEpstein estate or earlier custodianHouse Oversight
Law enforcement recordingPolice, FBI, DOJ, or territorial investigatorsHouse Oversight or DOJ
Congressional depositionHouse Oversight CommitteeHouse Oversight
Public hearingCongressional committeeCongress or public video platform
Media copyNews organizationMedia outlet
Court exhibitOriginal recorder identified in the exhibitCourt record or later government production

Congressional publication does not mean Congress originally recorded every file.


Little Saint James Property Videos

Video evidence from Little Saint James includes interior footage, exterior views, grounds documentation, surveillance material, and worker or staff interviews.

The EpsteinWiki collection titled Little St. James Island Interior and Grounds Visual Evidence, Photographs and Videos, 5201S through 9221 preserves a territorial or investigative visual record of the property.

The collection titled Little St. James Island Staff and Worker Interview Footage, DOJ OGR 00033293 documents interview material associated with people who worked on or had knowledge of the property.

Property videos can establish the appearance, layout, access points, furnishings, equipment, and condition of the island at the time of recording. They do not automatically establish how a room was used years earlier.

The existence of exterior surveillance cameras at the island and New York residence is discussed in EFTA01649081. According to the SDNY account preserved in that record, investigators found cameras near residence entrances but no cameras inside bedrooms or living areas during the 2019 searches.

The same account states that the property systems retained recordings for only a limited number of days. Prosecutors said recent 2019 footage was not responsive to warrants focused on conduct from the 1990s and early 2000s and was therefore not seized.

This is the government’s explanation for the decision. It does not provide the underlying surveillance files or independently verify every aspect of the search.


New York Residence Surveillance Evidence

An FBI search photograph in EFTA00000345 shows a sign stating “24 HOUR VIDEO SURVEILLANCE” at Epstein’s Manhattan residence.

An FBI evidence report within EFTA01684602 lists a Ubiquiti UniFi video recorder identified as model UVC NVR 2TB. The public evidence entry does not explain where the device was located or what recordings were recovered from it.

EFTA01780294 contains a February 16, 2010 email chain concerning camera installation. A shorter version of the same communication appears in EFTA01780259.

The camera installation messages establish discussion of surveillance equipment. They do not establish that every proposed camera was installed, where each camera was placed, how long recordings were retained, or whether the system operated continuously.


Palm Beach Police Video Evidence

The Southern District’s account in EFTA01649081 states that the Palm Beach Police Department:

  1. Videotaped interviews with victims at the police station.
  2. Recorded portions of its search of Epstein’s Palm Beach residence.
  3. Seized a limited number of videos.
  4. Transferred those recordings into FBI custody.
  5. Supplied search footage later introduced as an exhibit during the Maxwell trial.

The Palm Beach videotaped interviews must be handled as survivor evidence. Public transcripts may be indexed, but identifiable survivor video should not be republished without consent and a compelling evidentiary reason.

Related transcript records include:

A written transcript is not the same evidence object as the original video. Tone, pauses, visible demeanor, off camera comments, recording interruptions, and editing history may not be preserved in a transcript.


Depositions and Recorded Interviews

Video evidence connected to the Epstein investigations includes depositions, law enforcement interviews, proffers, and congressional testimony.

Principal categories include:

  1. The videotaped deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell.
  2. The DOJ interview of Ghislaine Maxwell conducted in July 2025.
  3. Videotaped depositions from civil litigation.
  4. Palm Beach police interviews.
  5. FBI recorded interviews.
  6. House Oversight depositions and transcribed interviews.
  7. Property staff and worker interviews.
  8. Public survivor statements and congressional roundtables.

These recordings must be distinguished from edited documentaries or news excerpts. A five minute broadcast segment may contain only part of a multihour deposition.

The EpsteinWiki Video Evidence category organizes individual pages concerning depositions, interviews, hearings, surveillance recordings, and native evidence files.


Video Allegations Without Released Footage

Some records describe alleged videos that have not been authenticated or released.

EFTA00067066 contains an alleged extortion email offering supposed Epstein related video evidence in exchange for Bitcoin. The EpsteinWiki analysis of EFTA00067066 explains that the message proves an extortion claim was communicated. It does not prove the recording existed.

EFTA01245103, EFTA01245104, and EFTA01245105 concern an FBI tip about a viral video reported as possibly depicting Epstein. The EpsteinWiki article on the viral video tip correctly treats the identification as an allegation.

Claims that Epstein recorded powerful people committing sexual crimes have circulated for years. A March 2025 government account in EFTA01649081 states that investigators reviewed more than one million images and videos extracted from Epstein’s devices and did not locate videos showing victims being sexually abused.

That statement is an official account of the review. The underlying review index referenced in the communication was not included with the cited pages. The government’s statement should therefore be attributed to prosecutors rather than treated as independent public verification of every file.


Video Evidence Searched, Seized, or Not Preserved

RecordWhat it documents
EFTA01649081Government account of property searches, device review, video review, and claimed findings
EFTA01649187MCC video extraction plan and failed DVR systems
EFTA01684602Evidence reports listing video systems, drives, archives, tapes, and surveillance related entries
EFTA00017953Missing July 22 and July 23 MCC footage
EFTA00017955Government correspondence concerning MCC video
EFTA00034725July 2019 preservation request
EFTA01301568FBI search warrant execution at 9 East 71st Street
EFTA00000345Photograph of surveillance warning sign
EFTA01780294Camera installation email chain
EFTA01780259Shorter production of the camera installation exchange

These records belong in the video index even when they do not contain playable footage. They document custody, preservation, review, equipment, search authority, and evidentiary gaps.


Chain of Custody

Video evidence can pass through several custodians before public release.

StagePossible custodian
Original recordingPrivate camera, phone, surveillance system, police department, government agency, or media organization
Initial storageCamera card, phone, computer, DVR, cloud account, optical disc, external drive, or server
SeizureLocal police, FBI, DOJ, Bureau of Prisons, territorial authorities, or civil litigants
Forensic processingFBI Computer Analysis Response Team or another forensic unit
Evidence storageAgency evidence system, case archive, court exhibit repository, tape archive, or external drive
Public productionDOJ, House Oversight, court filing, FOIA production, or government website
Independent indexingEpstein Data, EpsteinWiki, research repositories, and archival mirrors

For each file, researchers should seek:

  1. Original filename.
  2. Original extension.
  3. File size.
  4. Cryptographic hash.
  5. Creation and modification times.
  6. Camera or device metadata.
  7. Evidence item number.
  8. Seizure location.
  9. Seizing agent or agency.
  10. Forensic extraction report.
  11. Conversion history.
  12. Redaction history.
  13. Public release date.
  14. Duplicate or alternate identifiers.
  15. Any transcript or frame extraction.

A publicly released MP4 may be a converted copy rather than the original evidence file. Conversion can alter metadata, frame rate, time base, encoding, and file hashes without changing the visible scene.


What the Video Evidence Proves and Does Not Prove

ClaimAssessment
Thousands of native video files were included in DOJ productionsSupported
The current structured catalog identifies 3,385 video filesSupported
Dataset 9 contains the largest number of native videosSupported
MCC surveillance recordings were preserved and releasedSupported
Important MCC cameras were not recording when Epstein diedSupported by the DOJ Inspector General
Available MCC footage shows the inside of Epstein’s cellFalse
July 22 and July 23 footage requested after the earlier incident remained availableFalse according to the government’s court filing
Epstein properties used surveillance equipmentSupported
Investigators found cameras at residence entrancesSupported by the government’s account
Investigators found cameras in bedrooms during the 2019 searchesNot supported by the government’s account
Every video seized by investigators has been publicly releasedNot established
Every video file depicts Epstein or one of his propertiesFalse or unproven
Every person in a video has been reliably identifiedFalse
Every video contains evidence of a crimeFalse
An evidence title proves the identity or age of the subjectFalse
The released videos prove Epstein recorded powerful people committing crimesNot established
Prosecutors stated that they found no videos of victims being sexually abusedConfirmed as a government statement
The public can independently verify the government’s entire million file reviewNot currently established
Missing video proves a conspiracyFalse
Missing video and preservation failures require scrutinySupported

Research and Verification Standards

Before publishing claims about a video, researchers should:

  1. Open the native file rather than relying on a placeholder PDF.
  2. Record the EFTA or HOUSE_OVERSIGHT identifier.
  3. Preserve the original extension and file size.
  4. Generate a cryptographic hash when legally retaining a research copy.
  5. Record the visible time stamp separately from file metadata.
  6. Identify whether the video contains audio.
  7. Determine whether the file is complete, truncated, corrupt, or converted.
  8. Compare adjacent EFTA files for sequence continuity.
  9. Search for duplicates in other datasets.
  10. Separate visible fact from interpretation.
  11. Avoid identifying a person from appearance alone.
  12. Avoid estimating age from appearance unless necessary and responsibly qualified.
  13. Check whether a court, investigator, or reliable witness authenticated the recording.
  14. Search for an evidence inventory, search report, or chain of custody document.
  15. Preserve links to the original government source.
  16. Document any redaction or masking applied to the public copy.
  17. Do not republish survivor identifying footage.
  18. Do not circulate sexual or exploitative material for shock value.

Survivor Safety and Privacy Review

Video evidence can create a greater privacy risk than written records because a person may be identifiable through face, voice, clothing, location, movement, or surrounding objects.

A government release does not eliminate the ethical duty to protect survivors. Researchers should not use facial recognition, voice matching, family records, social media photographs, or contextual clues to identify a redacted survivor.

Files that may depict minors or vulnerable adults should not be downloaded, copied, or redistributed beyond what is lawful and necessary for legitimate research.

Descriptions should use neutral language. A title assigned by an archive may not accurately establish age, identity, consent, or conduct.

The purpose of indexing video evidence is accountability and preservation. It is not entertainment.


Why This Index Matters

Video can establish facts that are difficult to reconstruct from written records alone. It can show the layout of a property, the direction of movement through a hallway, the condition of a room, the presence of equipment, the timing of an event, or the exact words and demeanor of an interview subject.

The video archive also exposes major institutional questions. MCC had serious camera failures before Epstein’s death. Requested July footage was not preserved correctly. Property surveillance from 2019 was reportedly not seized because investigators considered it outside the warrant period. A large forensic review was described by prosecutors, but the complete review index has not been released with the cited communication.

The scale of the archive matters. A collection containing 3,385 native video files cannot be responsibly evaluated through a few viral clips. Researchers need file level indexing, technical metadata, chain of custody documentation, duplicate detection, transcripts, and careful visual review.

This index provides the map. The original files remain the evidence.


Questions Still Unanswered

  1. What is the precise subject and origin of every native video file?
  2. Which videos came from Epstein’s personal devices?
  3. Which files came from property surveillance systems?
  4. Which files were supplied by third parties?
  5. Which recordings were seized in Palm Beach?
  6. Which recordings were seized in New York?
  7. Which recordings were seized in the United States Virgin Islands?
  8. Which videos were recovered from CDs, DVDs, tapes, phones, cameras, or computers?
  9. Which files are duplicates or converted copies?
  10. Why do 1,067 files have zero second duration values?
  11. Why do 314 files lack duration information?
  12. Which videos are damaged or unplayable?
  13. Are original hashes available for every native file?
  14. Were any videos modified, shortened, blurred, muted, or transcoded before release?
  15. Which videos contain embedded time stamps?
  16. Are those time stamps accurate?
  17. Which MCC files form continuous sequences?
  18. What exact intervals are missing from the MCC release?
  19. Can any data be recovered from the failed MCC DVR drives?
  20. Why was July 22 and July 23 footage placed in the wrong retention tier?
  21. Who authorized the decision not to seize recent surveillance from Epstein’s properties?
  22. Was any preservation request issued before the property systems overwrote footage?
  23. What was stored on the UniFi video recorder seized in New York?
  24. Where were the cameras discussed in the 2010 installation emails located?
  25. Has the complete index of more than one million reviewed images and videos been released?
  26. Which Palm Beach victim interviews remain preserved as video?
  27. Which video exhibits were shown to the Maxwell jury?
  28. Are complete versions available for every publicly excerpted deposition?
  29. What is shown in HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026678?
  30. What is the origin of EFTA01648699?
  31. What location is shown in the amusement ride recordings?
  32. Who created or controlled the amusement ride surveillance system?
  33. What is the provenance of the file labeled “Man Girl Dog”?
  34. Which videos contain survivors or people who may have been minors?
  35. Were survivors notified before any identifiable footage was released?
  36. Will DOJ provide a file level chain of custody index?
  37. Will House Oversight release original metadata for estate supplied videos?
  38. Are additional videos still sealed, withheld, or connected to an active investigation?
  39. Which public claims about alleged recordings can be connected to an actual evidence file?
  40. Will future releases include complete native files rather than placeholder documents?

Related EpsteinWiki Pages


Source List

Primary Government Sources

  1. Department of Justice Epstein Library
  2. Department of Justice disclosures
  3. DOJ Inspector General report on Epstein’s custody, care, and supervision
  4. DOJ Inspector General release summary
  5. House Oversight release of DOJ records
  6. House Oversight release of Epstein estate records
  7. House Oversight additional estate document release

Evidence and Chain of Custody Records

  1. EFTA01649081, SDNY video review account
  2. EFTA01649187, MCC video extraction plan
  3. EFTA01684602, FBI evidence reports and video storage records
  4. EFTA00017953, missing July MCC footage
  5. EFTA00017955, government MCC video correspondence
  6. EFTA00034725, preservation request email chain
  7. EFTA01301568, FBI search of 9 East 71st Street
  8. EFTA00000345, surveillance warning sign
  9. EFTA01780294, camera installation email
  10. EFTA01780259, duplicate camera installation correspondence

Native File Catalogs and Independent Research

  1. Epstein Data native file catalog
  2. Epstein Data Video Evidence research page
  3. R. Howard Stone Epstein Research Data repository
  4. R. Howard Stone, Document Zero Episode 5: Hiding in Plain Sight
Previous Epstein Death in Custody
Next JeffTube JMail Epstein Video Archive
Table of Contents