Epstein Proffer Index

Record: attorney proffer letter · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO Southern District of Florida; Epstein federal grand-jury investigation

Date basis: Date stated in source

Defense counsel supplied a factual letter explaining claimed Fifth Amendment exposure before proposed grand-jury testimony.

Terms and limits: Counsel says a telephone agreement prevents use of the letter and its contents against the redacted client. The full operative agreement is not reproduced. The letter also refuses voluntary cooperation without immunity.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Identity remains redacted. This attorney letter is not the witness’s own interview or proof that the requested immunity was granted.

• EFTA01693124 (PDF 30, 31) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01693153, EFTA01693154
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: proposed proffer agreement · unsigned proposal

Case / agency: USAO SDFL/FBI; Epstein investigation

Date basis: Letter date; proposed interview day left blank

February 26 cover letter encloses a queen-for-a-day agreement and requests a witness interview that week. The signature/date lines are blank.

Terms and limits: SDFL states client is a victim/witness, not a target. Draft provides Rule 11(f) direct-use protection conditional on truthful, complete, accurate information; reserves false-statement/obstruction/perjury prosecutions and impeachment/cross-examination/rebuttal use. It expressly is not statutory immunity. No derivative-use ban like the March 27 revision is stated.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Unsigned draft; no completed interview established by this source. One production copy is inconsistently redacted; index keeps the participant coded rather than exploiting that inconsistency.

• EFTA01247984 (PDF 1, 2, 3, 4) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01247984, EFTA01247985, EFTA01247986, EFTA01247987
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00221066 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00221066
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: proffer letter proposed interview · scheduled not confirmed

Case / agency: USAO SDFL/FBI; Epstein investigation

Date basis: Proposed interview date; letter dated March 27, 2007

March 27, 2007 cover letter and three-page revised proffer letter propose an April 2 interview (April 3 or 4 also offered).

Terms and limits: SDFL describes the client as a victim/witness, not a target. Conditional protection covers both statements and directly/indirectly derived information against the client in a criminal case, except perjury/false statements; false/incomplete/misleading information defeats protection. Impeachment/cross-examination and government-attorney participation are reserved.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Copy’s execution status and completion of the proposed interview must not be inferred from the cover letter alone.

• EFTA01693496 (PDF 49, 50, 51, 52) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01693544, EFTA01693545, EFTA01693546, EFTA01693547
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: draft plea factual proffer · draft not interview

Case / agency: USAO SDFL; 2007 Epstein plea/NPA negotiations

Date basis: Date stated in source

AUSA sent Jay Lefkowitz a draft factual basis for a contemplated federal obstruction/harassment plea, rather than an interview protection agreement.

Terms and limits: Draft plea factual basis; not an executed cooperation or interview-immunity agreement.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Proposed facts are allegations/draft stipulations. Correspondence separately says facts needed confirmation; the draft does not establish Epstein admitted them.

• EFTA00213368 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00213368, EFTA00213369
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: draft state plea factual proffer · draft not interview

Case / agency: USAO SDFL / Florida state prosecution

Date basis: Date stated in source

Federal prosecutor sent a factual proffer for review of whether contemplated state charges had a sufficient factual basis.

Terms and limits: Factual basis supplied during state/federal plea negotiations; no interview-use protection established by this record.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Not a completed protected Epstein proffer session; does not itself establish which facts were ultimately adopted at the June 2008 plea.

• EFTA01659978 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01659978, EFTA01659979
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: proffer declined · declined at that time

Case / agency: USAO SDFL; Epstein grand-jury investigation

Date basis: Date stated in source

Counsel rejected a queen-for-a-day arrangement for a proposed June 24 interview and preferred proceeding with the July 1 grand-jury schedule and immunity process.

Terms and limits: No proffer agreement accepted in this exchange. The chain concerns obtaining statutory immunity authorization before grand-jury testimony.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: A refusal/proposal record; not a completed proffer. Later June 23 request for written attorney proffer separately indexed.

• EFTA00214410 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00214410, EFTA00214411
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: requested attorney proffer for immunity · requested not confirmed

Case / agency: USAO SDFL; Epstein federal grand jury

Date basis: Date stated in source

Prosecutor offered to seek immunity before July 1 grand-jury testimony if counsel supplied a written proffer establishing anticipated testimony and criminal exposure.

Terms and limits: Email says the written attorney statement would be treated as confidential plea discussions/related negotiations under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(f) and Fed. R. Evid. 410. Immunity was not automatic.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: June 26 email says subpoena would be withdrawn if Epstein entered the agreed state plea. A completed attorney submission or witness proffer is not shown here.

• EFTA00014140 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00014140, EFTA00014141
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: immunity request no proffer · negative control

Case / agency: USAO SDFL / DOJ Witness Immunity Unit

Date basis: Date stated in source

Compulsion-order request form proposes July 1 grand-jury testimony and explicitly checks that no anticipated-testimony proffer was obtained.

Terms and limits: Request for statutory compulsion/immunity authorization, not a signed proffer agreement.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Exclude from completed-proffer counts. Scheduled testimony is not shown to have occurred.

• EFTA00190112 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00190112
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: information sharing reference · reference no proffer established

Case / agency: FBI Miami,31E-MM-108062-FF; Epstein forfeiture subfile

Date basis: Memo date September 18,2008; reports a case-agent update of September 11

FBI memorandum reports that, as of the case agent’s September 11 update, Epstein had provided information to the FBI as agreed upon. The memorandum requests closure of the forfeiture subfile.

Terms and limits: The memorandum supplies no underlying information-sharing agreement, interview-use restrictions, date of any actual meeting, substantive statement, or explanation of what was provided.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: This is an information-sharing reference, not proof of a protected proffer, informant status, cooperation in an unrelated case, or any Bear Stearns arrangement. Actual information-sharing date is unknown; September 18 is the memo date.

• EFTA00270003 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00270003
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: reported cooperation claim negative check · claim contradicted by contemporaneous record

Case / agency: USAO EDNY and SDFL; United States v. Cioffi and Tannin

Date basis: Email dateJuly23,2009, responding to a same-day article

Prosecutors handling the Bear Stearns case emailed after a newspaper cooperation claim and said they had never heard of Epstein until that morning. The Florida prosecutor’s same-day internal follow-up records the same response.

Terms and limits: No protected proffer or cooperation agreement established. This row preserves the claim and the primary record contradicting it without treating the press report as evidence of a session.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The email concerns the specific United States v. Cioffi and Tannin claim. Do not turn it into a universal finding that Epstein never supplied information to any official. The separate September 2008 FBI information-sharing reference has a different and unspecified scope.

• EFTA00078956 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00078956
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: executed plea factual proffer · executed plea documented

Case / agency: United States v. Rodriguez,9:10-cr-80015-KAM(S.D.Fla.),DE25; reproduced Doe v. Epstein,9:08-cv-80119-KAM,DE560-2

Date basis: Signature dates and March 18 criminal docket filing; later civil reproduction June 10,2010

Executed plea agreement includes a factual proffer in paragraph 10, pages 6–8, supporting the obstruction-of-justice guilty plea. Defendant and counsel signed March 17; prosecutor signed and criminal court filing occurred March 18.

Terms and limits: Factual basis stipulated as sufficient to support a guilty plea under 18 U.S.C.1512(c), rather than a protected witness interview. Agreement provides conditional acceptance-of-responsibility sentencing recommendations, reserves relevant sentencing disclosures, states recommendations do not bind the court and no sentence is guaranteed, and contains forfeiture and entire-agreement provisions.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Do not label the unsigned EFTA00207761 draft as executed. The March 17–18 signed filing is EFTA02749732. Earlier police/FBI interviews and civil depositions mentioned in the factual basis are not thereby established as protected proffers.

• EFTA02749732 (PDF 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) · PDF mirror · Primary source
  Page stamps: EFTA02749732, EFTA02749736, EFTA02749737, EFTA02749738, EFTA02749739, EFTA02749740, EFTA02749741
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00207759 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00207759, EFTA00207760
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00207761 (PDF 6, 10) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00207766, EFTA00207770
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: claimed proffer reference · underlying statement not verified by fbi search

Case / agency: FBI Miami/Newark; Alfredo Rodriguez obstruction investigation72-MM-113327, referencing financial matter196C-NY-235483

Date basis: Original EC date in body;2019 header is re-entry date

FBI communication records an ACS search that did not reflect the referenced information having been offered by Hoffenberg as a proffer in his earlier financial case; it requests a further interview.

Terms and limits: No underlying proffer statement, agreement, date, or protection terms located in this source. The requested interview is not shown here to have occurred.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: An explicitly unverified reference, not an established Hoffenberg proffer or evidence that the disputed underlying allegation is true. Underlying alleged-proffer date is unknown. Original communication is September 2,2010; the reproduced record header is January 10,2019.

• EFTA01326139 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01326139, EFTA01326140
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: multiple proffers reference · range reference not additional count

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

December memo reports multiple proffers between March and July 2019.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Range-level corroboration only, not a count of additional sessions; may overlap the dated 3501.162 series. No identity unmasking.

• EFTA02731082 (PDF 3) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731084
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: Attorney proffer documented in handwritten notes · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI, Epstein and Maxwell trafficking investigation

Date basis: April 5 handwritten heading; counsel-team cross-reference supported by matching April 24 FD-302 copies and production code.

Handwritten notes establish the April 5 attorney presentation previously located only as a schedule. The subsequent coded FD-302 and a matching copy identify the counsel team without naming the survivor.

Terms and limits: The scheduling chain supplies a form for a later client interview, not a signed agreement for the attorney presentation. No protection is inferred solely from the form attachment.

Availability: Cited released records available; no additional immunity terms inferred.

Interpretation: This upgrades the scheduled April 5 entry; it does not create a second session. The client remains coded.

• EFTA01247288 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: 3501.162-015, EFTA01247288
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.
• EFTA00030151 (PDF 1–2) · PDF mirror
  Primary released PDF downloaded from public mirror; text and relevant page image inspected
• EFTA00096196 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00096196
  Matching primary FD-302 copy: interview/entry/drafting dates, case number and counsel fields inspected; relevant page image checked.
• EFTA01247289 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01247289
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Witness interview pursuant to a proffer agreement; later continuations are written on the April 24 agreement.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Participant remains coded; do not infer or publish a survivor identity. FD-302 entry/drafting dates differ from the event dates.

• EFTA01247289 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01247289
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01682025 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01682025, EFTA01682026
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01247320 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01247320, EFTA01247321
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Witness interview pursuant to a proffer agreement; later continuations are written on the April 24 agreement.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Participant remains coded; do not infer or publish a survivor identity. FD-302 entry/drafting dates differ from the event dates.

• EFTA01247302 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01247302
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01682025 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01682025, EFTA01682026
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01247320 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01247320, EFTA01247321
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Witness interview pursuant to a proffer agreement; later continuations are written on the April 24 agreement.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Participant remains coded; do not infer or publish a survivor identity. FD-302 entry/drafting dates differ from the event dates.

• EFTA01247310 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01247310
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01682025 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01682025, EFTA01682026
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01247320 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01247320, EFTA01247321
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Witness interview pursuant to a proffer agreement; later continuations are written on the April 24 agreement.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Participant remains coded; do not infer or publish a survivor identity. FD-302 entry/drafting dates differ from the event dates.

• EFTA01247322 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01247322
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01682025 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01682025, EFTA01682026
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01247320 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01247320, EFTA01247321
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: attorney proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Two-page handwritten counsel presentation precedes the July 12 personal proffer.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Heading/date and discovery 3524-008 visually checked. This is a separate attorney presentation, not another copy of July 12 witness interview.

• EFTA00159319 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159319, EFTA00159320
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

July 12, 2019 proffer agreement represented by Joseph Nascimento, with this date recorded as the initial meeting or a continuation.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The participant’s name is redacted. Continuation dates read visually: 9/10/19, 5/14/21, 8/20/21, 9/30/21, 10/1/21, 11/5/21. Do not confuse report entry dates or production dates with interview dates.

• EFTA00159321 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159321
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00159466 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159466, EFTA00159467
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00027643 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00027643, EFTA00027644
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA02731082 (PDF 39) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731120
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: Possible attorney proffer / voluntary interview · Proposed; completion not established

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI; Epstein-Maxwell federal investigation

Date basis: Date of substantive email retained in July 30 chain.

Prosecutors sought flight records and an account of observations, and held the subpoena return date in abeyance because an attorney proffer or voluntary interview was being contemplated.

Terms and limits: No agreed use restriction or signed agreement appears. Holding a subpoena date is not a grant of immunity.

Availability: Public released correspondence or notes; underlying agreement/complete session record not located in the cited source.

Interpretation: The record does not establish a completed Hammond proffer. The later call scheduling is not a substantive proffer merely because it is in the same chain.

• EFTA00096229 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00096229, EFTA00096230
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.

Record: Unassigned meeting and signed-proffer attachment reference · Reference confirmed; overlap with coded records unresolved

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI, Epstein trafficking investigation

Date basis: Email sent July 18 at 00:52 UTC thanks counsel/client for meeting today and attaches a July 17 signed proffer agreement.

A contemporaneous thank-you email establishes a meeting with counsel and client and references the dated signed-proffer attachment.

Terms and limits: The email references an attached signed agreement. No terms or client-code match are inferred from the filename alone.

Availability: Email is released. The attachment’s identity is not conclusively matched to a coded agreement in this index.

Interpretation: This may overlap another same-date entry. It is retained as an unassigned reference, not counted as a new unique session or used to identify a redacted client.

• EFTA00101156 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00101156
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.

Record: proffer agreement · agreement documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Dated SDNY agreement for a redacted client; discovery stamp 3501.051-001.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Agreement documents the arranged meeting and terms; separate substantive interview report not yet matched. No name inferred.

• EFTA01245647 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01245647, EFTA01245648
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: cooperation offer reference · offer no completed proffer shown

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Counsel requested a Rule 35 meeting and said Cohen had heard Trump say things about Epstein; details were withheld.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Record does not call this a proffer or document a completed substantive session; classified as an offer/reference only.

• EFTA00016171 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00016171
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: reverse proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Government described evidence to Groff and encouraged her to give her own account.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: A reverse proffer is the government’s presentation; it is not proof Groff made a protected statement that day.

• EFTA02731082 (PDF 65) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731146
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00014598 (PDF 1, 5, 6, 8) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00014598, EFTA00014602, EFTA00014603, EFTA00014605
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: attorney proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Counsel presented an account of Wexner’s relationship with Epstein and financial dealings.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Statements are attributed to counsel, not sworn Wexner testimony; this entry makes no finding that counsel’s assertions were true.

• EFTA02731082 (PDF 65, 66, 67) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731146, EFTA02731147, EFTA02731148
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: cooperation discussion · proposal no completed proffer shown

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Handwritten meeting notes record counsel discussing what would be needed for Epstein to reach a point where he could cooperate.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The note describes a contemplated process and request for several days away from MCC; it does not establish that Epstein gave a factual proffer.

• EFTA01681972 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01681972
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: attorney proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Prosecutors record three attorney proffers preceding two personal proffers.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Client’s name is redacted in this source. Do not identify by redaction length or by press speculation.

• EFTA01246614 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246614
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA02731082 (PDF 49) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731130
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: proffer declined · declined at that time

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Multiple August/September calls ended with counsel saying Brunel would not meet for a proffer and would invoke the Fifth if subpoenaed.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: No completed Brunel proffer established by this source. Calls with his attorney are not themselves necessarily attorney factual proffers.

• EFTA02731082 (PDF 65) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731146
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: proffer declined · declined at that time

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Counsel declined to bring Groff for a witness proffer and described intended Fifth Amendment invocation.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Point-in-time refusal. Superseded as an overall-history claim by the documented July 23, 2021 agreement and interview.

• EFTA02731082 (PDF 65) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731146
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: Attorney proffer referenced by prosecutors and OIG · Completed, reference-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: August 11 contemporaneous email and dated attachment filename in a later email.

Contemporaneous August 11 email confirms an attorney presentation about Epstein’s August 9 call. A later email identifies an attachment dated August 11; the OIG report separately discusses this attorney proffer.

Terms and limits: No signed agreement or use restrictions located. The OIG says it did not investigate the factual accuracy of the attorney proffer.

Availability: Contemporaneous reference, attachment filename and official OIG discussion released; complete underlying attorney notes not located.

Interpretation: Keep the OIG pseudonym. The date is supported by contemporaneous email and the attachment filename, not by a signed agreement.

• EFTA00066538 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA00030456 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• Primary record (PDF 66–67; printed pages 59–60, footnote 34)
  Official OIG PDF text and page image inspected

Record: Proposed telephone proffer · Proposed; completion not established

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Date of proposal email; the contemplated session was early the following week.

The August 11 email proposed a telephone proffer early the following week. The later OIG report says Individual 1 declined its interview request.

Terms and limits: No terms located.

Availability: Proposal reference available; no completed direct-proffer record located.

Interpretation: Declining an OIG interview does not establish whether every separate prosecutor contact failed. Do not turn the proposal into a completed session.

• EFTA00066538 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• Primary record (PDF 66–67; printed pages 59–60, footnote 34)
  Official OIG PDF text and page image inspected

Record: Attorney-proffer call reference · Completed call; attorney-proffer reference; overlap unresolved

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI; Epstein-Maxwell federal investigation

Date basis: August 15 email thanks prosecutors for yesterday’s phone call and proposes continuing discussions and attorney proffer.

Counsel referred to continuing an attorney proffer after an August 14 call. Later correspondence schedules further meetings.

Terms and limits: No signed use restrictions or complete presentation supplied.

Availability: Public released correspondence or notes; underlying agreement/complete session record not located in the cited source.

Interpretation: The wording links an ongoing proffer process to the prior call but does not establish a separately bounded session or a new person. May overlap another coded attorney-proffer series; do not infer an identity or add it to a unique-session total.

• EFTA00025355 (PDF 10, 11) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00025364, EFTA00025365
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

The cover sheet explicitly identifies a proffer under an agreement; the interview date is August 16, although the report was drafted August 28 and entered August 29.

Terms and limits: The report states that the interview was pursuant to a proffer agreement. The signed agreement and its exact use restrictions were not located in this record.

Availability: Released FD-302 and handwritten notes available in the cited PDF.

Interpretation: An interview summary records an account; its existence does not establish every statement as fact.

• EFTA00126106 (PDF 1–9) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA00132208 (PDF 18) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Ordinary interview, retained as a false-positive control · Interview confirmed; protected proffer not established

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

This person appears in the 14-person inmate roster, but the reviewed FD-302 does not identify the interview as conducted pursuant to a proffer agreement.

Terms and limits: No proffer agreement or agreed use restriction is established by this record.

Availability: Released FD-302; notes where included.

Interpretation: The roster is an interview inventory, not a list of fourteen signed proffer agreements.

• EFTA00126118 (PDF 1–7) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Ordinary interview, retained as a false-positive control · Interview confirmed; protected proffer not established

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

This person appears in the 14-person inmate roster, but the reviewed FD-302 does not identify the interview as conducted pursuant to a proffer agreement.

Terms and limits: No proffer agreement or agreed use restriction is established by this record.

Availability: Released FD-302; notes where included.

Interpretation: The roster is an interview inventory, not a list of fourteen signed proffer agreements.

• EFTA00130149 (PDF 180–181) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Ordinary interview, retained as a false-positive control · Interview confirmed; protected proffer not established

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

This person appears in the 14-person inmate roster, but the reviewed FD-302 does not identify the interview as conducted pursuant to a proffer agreement.

Terms and limits: No proffer agreement or agreed use restriction is established by this record.

Availability: Released FD-302; notes where included.

Interpretation: The roster is an interview inventory, not a list of fourteen signed proffer agreements.

• EFTA00132208 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

The FD-302 cover explicitly identifies an agreed proffer, followed by handwritten notes.

Terms and limits: The report states that the interview was pursuant to a proffer agreement. The signed agreement and its exact use restrictions were not located in this record.

Availability: Released FD-302 and handwritten notes available in the cited PDF.

Interpretation: An interview summary records an account; its existence does not establish every statement as fact.

• EFTA00126081 (PDF 1–5) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA00130149 (PDF 185) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

An employee interview in lieu of a federal grand-jury appearance. Several copies carry different report-entry dates but the same August 20 interview date.

Terms and limits: The FD-302 says the interview was voluntary and that the prosecutor reviewed a standard proffer agreement. Exact contractual clauses are not included.

Availability: Released three-page FD-302, including a copy labeled Employee 7.

Interpretation: Do not count differently entered copies as new interviews.

• EFTA00135558 (PDF 1–3) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA00009958 (PDF 1–3) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA00101264 (PDF 1–3) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Attorney proffer referenced in contemporaneous email · Completed, reference-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Contemporaneous email gives August 20 at about 3:30 p.m.

A prosecutor states that Patel provided an attorney proffer at approximately 3:30 p.m. on August 20.

Terms and limits: Attorney presentation; no agreement terms supplied by the email.

Availability: Email confirmation is released. A standalone transcript or complete attorney presentation was not located.

Interpretation: Keep this attorney presentation separate from the September 3 client interview.

• EFTA00018957 (PDF 1–2) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA00020447 (PDF 2) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Ordinary interview, retained as a false-positive control · Interview confirmed; protected proffer not established

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

This person appears in the 14-person inmate roster, but the reviewed FD-302 does not identify the interview as conducted pursuant to a proffer agreement.

Terms and limits: No proffer agreement or agreed use restriction is established by this record.

Availability: Released FD-302; notes where included.

Interpretation: The roster is an interview inventory, not a list of fourteen signed proffer agreements.

• EFTA00126086 (PDF 1–3) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

The August 21 interview was entered on December 20. That later entry date must not become the session date.

Terms and limits: The report states that the interview was pursuant to a proffer agreement. The signed agreement and its exact use restrictions were not located in this record.

Availability: Released FD-302 and handwritten notes available in the cited PDF.

Interpretation: An interview summary records an account; its existence does not establish every statement as fact.

• EFTA00126094 (PDF 1–5) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA01688067 (PDF 244) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01688310
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Attorney proffer invitation referenced in email · Proposed; completion not established

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI, Epstein and Maxwell trafficking investigation

Date basis: Date of the contemporaneous email describing a prior Sunday conversation; not a completed-session date.

Prosecutors discussed a prior call with counsel and said an attorney proffer about knowledge of charged conduct would be useful. The chain corrects a reported characterization of that conversation.

Terms and limits: No agreed protection, completed attorney presentation or exoneration is established.

Availability: Cited released records available; no additional immunity terms inferred.

Interpretation: This records an investigative invitation. It does not establish that Richardson committed an offense or was formally cleared.

• EFTA00032235 (PDF 1–2) · PDF mirror
  Primary released PDF downloaded from public mirror; text and relevant page image inspected

Record: Client proffer referenced in FBI update · Completed, reference-confirmed

Case / agency: FBI related MCC misconduct inquiry; case identified in later update as 282B-NY-3156749

Date basis: August 22 session date expressly stated in the FBI update.

An FBI update expressly states that a witness was provided an attorney and proffered on August 22. This is in the separate sex/drug investigation section.

Terms and limits: Agreement and any benefits were not located.

Availability: FBI update available; full underlying proffer record not located.

Interpretation: The index withholds the witness’s name because the record concerns possible sexual victimization. This is not a trafficking-case proffer or proof of a death conspiracy.

• EFTA00102085 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

The agreement is referenced in the FD-302; counsel and SDNY/FBI/OIG participants are listed.

Terms and limits: The report states that the interview was pursuant to a proffer agreement. The signed agreement and its exact use restrictions were not located in this record.

Availability: Released FD-302 and handwritten notes available in the cited PDF.

Interpretation: An interview summary records an account; its existence does not establish every statement as fact.

• EFTA00126068 (PDF 1–3) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA00130149 (PDF 449) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

The surname appears in the cover sheet and the master roster supplies the full public name. The shorter compilation is not the complete released notes bundle.

Terms and limits: The report states that the interview was pursuant to a proffer agreement. The signed agreement and its exact use restrictions were not located in this record.

Availability: Released FD-302 and handwritten notes available in the cited PDF.

Interpretation: An interview summary records an account; its existence does not establish every statement as fact.

• EFTA00126058 (PDF 1–5) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA00132684 (PDF 40–42) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA00161492 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

The cover sheet confirms an August 28 proffer. September 23 is the report-entry and drafting date.

Terms and limits: The report states that the interview was pursuant to a proffer agreement. The signed agreement and its exact use restrictions were not located in this record.

Availability: Released FD-302 and handwritten notes available in the cited PDF.

Interpretation: An interview summary records an account; its existence does not establish every statement as fact.

• EFTA00126075 (PDF 1–6) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Proposed reverse proffer · Scheduled reference; completion not established

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI; Epstein-Maxwell federal investigation

Date basis: FBI summary circulated August 15–16 says reverse-proffer date was set for September, without a day.

An FBI investigative summary states that a reverse proffer involving Maxwell was set for September.

Terms and limits: A contemplated government presentation; no agreement terms or completed session shown.

Availability: Public released correspondence or notes; underlying agreement/complete session record not located in the cited source.

Interpretation: Do not conflate the proposed September reverse proffer with the independently documented October 8 attorney proffer or July 2025 personal proffer. Earlier July 9 correspondence with Jeffrey S. Pagliuca transmitted a form proffer letter and discussed a potential meeting; the planned July 11 counsel call is not a completed client proffer. The July correspondence does not itself label the contemplated format reverse.

• EFTA00173197 (PDF 1, 3) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00173197, EFTA00173199
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.
• EFTA00083886 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00083886, EFTA00083887
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.

Record: Interview after a proffer was proposed; no written agreement requested · Completed interview; agreement expressly declined by counsel

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: September 3 completion email and FD-302 interview date.

Emails first contemplated a proffer, then state that counsel preferred not to have a proffer agreement. A September 3 email confirms the meeting occurred and an FD-302 would follow.

Terms and limits: No agreement was requested by counsel in the scheduling email. The term proffer in subsequent correspondence must not be treated as evidence of contractual immunity.

Availability: Released emails, two-page FD-302 and handwritten notes.

Interpretation: The actual session is a documented interview. The public record reviewed does not establish protected-use terms.

• EFTA00020447 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA00132208 (PDF 173–176) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Scheduled further client proffer · Scheduled; completion not established

Case / agency: FBI related MCC misconduct inquiry, 282B-NY-3156749

Date basis: September 4 prospective session date stated in August 28 scheduling email.

A late-August FBI email says the same witness is coming back for a further proffer on September 4.

Terms and limits: Terms not shown.

Availability: Scheduling reference available.

Interpretation: Scheduled date is not a verified completion date.

• EFTA01660840 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

The compilation contains only the cover sheet at this location; a separate three-page PDF contains a cover sheet and two pages of notes.

Terms and limits: The report states that the interview was pursuant to a proffer agreement. The signed agreement and its exact use restrictions were not located in this record.

Availability: Released FD-302 and handwritten notes available in the cited PDF.

Interpretation: The name is redacted in the cited interview. The index retains the case serial rather than reconstructing identity. The released notes were located, so they are not classified as missing.

• EFTA00126063 (PDF 1–3) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA01688067 (PDF 243) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01688309
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: attorney proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Prosecutors record three attorney proffers preceding two personal proffers.

Terms and limits: Handwritten heading expressly says attorney proffer only, not waiving rights. No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Client’s name is redacted in this source. Do not identify by redaction length or by press speculation.

• EFTA01246617 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246617
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA02731082 (PDF 49) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731130
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

The compilation cover sheet names Sanchez-Galan. The separate three-page release contains the cover and two handwritten pages dated September 9.

Terms and limits: The report states that the interview was pursuant to a proffer agreement. The signed agreement and its exact use restrictions were not located in this record.

Availability: Released FD-302 and handwritten notes available in the cited PDF.

Interpretation: The separate notes bundle has a redacted name. Matching date, FD-302 wording and serial-bearing compilation support the cross-reference. The notes are present in the release.

• EFTA00126115 (PDF 1–3) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA01688067 (PDF 242) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01688308
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Aggregate proffer / reverse-proffer reference · Completed presentations referenced; not additional unique-session count

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI; Epstein-Maxwell federal investigation

Date basis: September 17 update says last week; calendar range inferred, while related planning emails mentionSeptember10 andSeptember11.

An FBI update expressly reports two reverse proffers and one personal proffer during the prior week. Separate correspondence schedules a Palm Beach reverse proffer for September 10 and another reverse proffer for September 11.

Terms and limits: No operative protection agreement supplied for the reverse presentations. A reverse proffer is the government’s presentation.

Availability: Public released correspondence or notes; underlying agreement/complete session record not located in the cited source.

Interpretation: The personal proffer may overlap the separately indexed September 10 coded3524 continuation. Planning dates do not independently prove which reverse presentation occurred when. Redacted participants are not identified and no extra unique-session total is claimed.

• EFTA00150159 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00150159, EFTA00150160
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.
• EFTA00084981 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00084981
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.
• EFTA00030660 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00030660
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

The named compilation cover sheet and separate four-page release document a September 10 proffer and accompanying handwritten notes.

Terms and limits: The report states that the interview was pursuant to a proffer agreement. The signed agreement and its exact use restrictions were not located in this record.

Availability: Released FD-302 and handwritten notes available in the cited PDF.

Interpretation: The name is redacted in the standalone PDF but visible in the serial-bearing compilation. The notes are present in the release.

• EFTA00126090 (PDF 1–4) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA01688067 (PDF 245) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01688311
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: witness proffer continuation · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

July 12, 2019 proffer agreement represented by Joseph Nascimento, with this date recorded as the initial meeting or a continuation.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The participant’s name is redacted. Continuation dates read visually: 9/10/19, 5/14/21, 8/20/21, 9/30/21, 10/1/21, 11/5/21. Do not confuse report entry dates or production dates with interview dates.

• EFTA00153692 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00153692
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00159466 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159466, EFTA00159467
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00027643 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00027643, EFTA00027644
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA02731082 (PDF 41) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731122
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

A material-handler interview in lieu of a grand-jury appearance, later continued on September 30.

Terms and limits: The FD-302 says the interview was voluntary and the prosecutor went over a standard proffer agreement. Signed terms were not located.

Availability: Released five-page FD-302.

Interpretation: Identity remains redacted. The continuation is separately indexed because it is a distinct interview date.

• EFTA00068273 (PDF 1–5) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Attorney proffer · Completed; notes and planning correspondence public

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI Epstein financial investigation

Date basis: Handwritten notebook heading, independently corroborated by September 10–11 scheduling correspondence. August 15–20 correspondence establishes planned format, not another completed session.

Handwritten notes explicitly identify a September 12 Deutsche Bank attorney proffer. The presentation addressed the bank relationship, onboarding, compliance review, accounts and termination.

Terms and limits: Counsel proposed an overview of the bank relationship, Epstein-affiliated accounts, transactions and internal investigation findings, followed by identifying bank personnel for further questions. No executed use-immunity or cooperation agreement located in these sources.

Availability: Three pages of handwritten notes plus scheduling and scope emails; complete attendee list and corresponding formal interview report not established.

Interpretation: An attorney presentation is not Paul Morris giving personal testimony. A proffer does not itself prove criminal wrongdoing by the bank or any person. The estimated meeting length in scheduling emails is not a verified duration.

• EFTA01681984 (PDF 1, 2, 3) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01681984, EFTA01681985, EFTA01681986
  Handwritten heading and EFTA stamp visually verified on p1; three-page document downloaded; OCR is unreliable.
• EFTA00080971 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00080971
  PDF visually verified: September 10 and 11 counsel/SDNY emails anticipate Thursday proffer and discussion of Gratitude America.
• EFTA00024410 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00024410, EFTA00024411
  PDF p1 visually verified; August 20 attorney describes proposed format and 2–3-hour estimate; p2 contextual scheduling correspondence read.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Agreement names Barnett and Sanford Talkin; December memo confirms an interview that date.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation:

• EFTA01245368 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01245368, EFTA01245369
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA02731082 (PDF 39) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731120
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: Continuation under prior proffer agreement · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI / DOJ OIG; FBI 90A-NY-3151227, Epstein death investigation

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

A second interview of the material handler, explicitly carrying forward the earlier standard agreement.

Terms and limits: The prosecutor expressly states that the standard proffer agreement in effect for the first interview applies to this interview.

Availability: Released three-page FD-302, including a copy labeled Employee 4.

Interpretation: The entry date is October 2; the interview date is September 30.

• EFTA00135607 (PDF 1–3) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy
• EFTA00141088 (PDF 1–3) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: attorney proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Attorneys presented the client’s background and account before the client’s October interviews.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The memo’s participant remains redacted. Do not assign an identity from redaction length. Handwritten discovery stamp is3501.144-056; do not confuse with3501.125-060, the separate October 18 presentation.

• EFTA01246900 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246900, EFTA01246901
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA02731082 (PDF 43) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731124
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: attorney proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Defense lawyers provided a presentation; handwritten notes explicitly caption it GM attorney proffer.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Separate from Maxwell’s July 2025 personal DOJ sessions. Counsel’s denials and account are advocacy, not sworn testimony or established facts.

• EFTA01681957 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01681957
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA02731082 (PDF 62, 63, 64) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731143, EFTA02731144, EFTA02731145
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00038227 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00038227
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01649149 (PDF 3) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01649151
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: interview within proffer series · completed interview protection not separately established

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Completed October 11 interview within a series whose October 15 and 25 meetings are expressly called proffers. The October 11 protected status is not separately established.

Terms and limits: No signed or operative agreement matched. The memo calls October 11 an interview, and expressly calls only the later October 15/25 meetings proffers. Do not infer October 11 use restrictions.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The first meeting is called an interview within a three-meeting series; subsequent meetings are explicitly called proffers. No operative agreement matched yet. Participant remains coded.

• EFTA02731082 (PDF 43, 44) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731124, EFTA02731125
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

One of three personal meetings summarized after the October 7 attorney proffer.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The first meeting is called an interview within a three-meeting series; subsequent meetings are explicitly called proffers. No operative agreement matched yet. Participant remains coded.

• EFTA01246882 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246882
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA02731082 (PDF 43, 46) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731124, EFTA02731127
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: attorney proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Prosecutors record three attorney proffers preceding two personal proffers.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Client’s name is redacted in this source. Do not identify by redaction length or by press speculation.

• EFTA01246623 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246623
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA02731082 (PDF 49) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731130
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

One of three personal meetings summarized after the October 7 attorney proffer.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The first meeting is called an interview within a three-meeting series; subsequent meetings are explicitly called proffers. No operative agreement matched yet. Participant remains coded.

• EFTA02731082 (PDF 43, 47) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731124, EFTA02731128
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: two personal proffers named reference · range reference not additional count

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; search warrant 20MAG6719

Date basis: Date stated in source

A publicly released search-warrant affidavit expressly names Kellen as participating in two government proffers in November and December 2019.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Month-level named primary corroboration only; the footnote gives no exact dates or documentary code crosswalk. May overlap coded entries, so do not count as additional sessions or use it to unmask redacted participants.

• EFTA01653490 (PDF 14) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01653503
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Personal proffer following the three attorney proffers; November 26 agreement lists December 4 continuation.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations. The memo separately records an agreed subject-matter limitation excluding the client’s obstructive conduct during the first investigation.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Do not confuse EFTA00159321 report-entry date November 26 with this separate November 26 session; that file documents a July 12 interview of discovery witness 3524.

• EFTA01246590 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246590, EFTA01246591
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01246581 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246581
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA02731082 (PDF 49, 52) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731130, EFTA02731133
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Personal proffer following the three attorney proffers; November 26 agreement lists December 4 continuation.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations. The memo separately records an agreed subject-matter limitation excluding the client’s obstructive conduct during the first investigation.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Do not confuse EFTA00159321 report-entry date November 26 with this separate November 26 session; that file documents a July 12 interview of discovery witness 3524.

• EFTA01246590 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246590, EFTA01246591
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01246595 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246595
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA02731082 (PDF 49, 52) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731130, EFTA02731133
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: Attorney proffer referenced in contemporaneous email · Completed, reference-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI, Epstein and Maxwell trafficking investigation

Date basis: Forwarded email shows December 23, 2019 at 9:34 p.m.; the standalone UTC timestamp falls on December 24.

A prosecutor memorialized a brief attorney proffer and anticipated a fuller presentation. The December 23 local date appears in the forwarded chain; the standalone email is timestamped December 24 UTC.

Terms and limits: A statement that prosecutors then had no reason to believe the client had criminal exposure is a limited assessment based on known facts, not an immunity agreement.

Availability: Cited released records available; no additional immunity terms inferred.

Interpretation:

• EFTA00030695 (PDF 2) · PDF mirror
  Primary released PDF downloaded from public mirror; text and relevant page image inspected
• EFTA00079551 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Primary released PDF downloaded from public mirror; text and relevant page image inspected

Record: Written attorney proffer · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI, Epstein and Maxwell trafficking investigation

Date basis: Document heading or contemporaneous email date

An eleven-page letter is expressly headed Attorney Proffer and dated January 3, 2020. The accompanying email says counsel assembled it from client interviews and described potential testimony.

Terms and limits: The recipient repeated a preliminary no-known-criminal-exposure assessment. No signed nonprosecution or immunity agreement appears in these documents.

Availability: Cited released records available; no additional immunity terms inferred.

Interpretation: Counsel’s account is not sworn client testimony or an adjudicated finding.

• EFTA01246801 (PDF 1–11) · PDF mirror
  Primary released PDF downloaded from public mirror; text and relevant page image inspected
• EFTA00030695 (PDF 1–2) · PDF mirror
  Primary released PDF downloaded from public mirror; text and relevant page image inspected

Record: Scheduled attorney proffer · Scheduled; completion not independently established

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI; Epstein-Maxwell federal investigation

Date basis: December 20 request for full attorney proffer; January 6 email reschedules to Wednesday January 8 at 3:30 p.m. Eastern.

Counsel and prosecutors arranged an attorney-proffer call before any direct witness interview concerning a witness account relevant to Prince Andrew.

Terms and limits: No signed immunity, cooperation or use-restriction agreement appears.

Availability: Public released correspondence or notes; underlying agreement/complete session record not located in the cited source.

Interpretation: Later correspondence refers to additional calls and multiple redacted clients; do not assume every later call is the same client’s protected proffer or treat scheduling as completion.

• EFTA00032225 (PDF 3, 4) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00032227, EFTA00032228
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Dated agreement and a17-page FD-302 confirm Rodgers met with prosecutors and Brendan Quigley on February 7,2020.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: FD-302 entered April 23,2020; actual interview February 7,2020. Do not equate earlier Rodgers FBI interviews with proffers.

• EFTA00159178 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159178, EFTA00159179
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00087727 (PDF 8, 9) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00087734, EFTA00087735
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00159180 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159180
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: FBI index reference to a proffer · Referenced in inventory; underlying record not located

Case / agency: Related MCC inquiry; inventory reference

Date basis: Date embedded in the inventory title; session not independently confirmed.

The inventory contains a proffer title dated February 12, 2020 in the related MCC investigation section.

Terms and limits: No agreement or substantive interview record located.

Availability: Index reference available.

Interpretation: This row establishes a listed record. It is not an independently verified account of the meeting or a new identified person.

• EFTA01730634 (PDF 98) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: attorney proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Four-page handwritten notes explicitly identify an attorney proffer regarding Groff; contemporaneous correspondence defines preliminary/hypothetical nature and agreed evidentiary protections.

Terms and limits: Government accepted treatment under Fed. R. Evid.410 and Fed. R. Crim. P.11(f), acknowledged the preliminary presentation subject to refinement/document review, but declined to guarantee Rule 408 protection in civil litigation. Counsel asserted Rule 408 separately.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Counsel presentation, not a personal Groff interview. Later March–June discussions about interviewing her do not prove an additional completed session.

• EFTA01246203 (PDF 1, 2, 3, 4) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246203, EFTA01246204, EFTA01246205, EFTA01246206
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00032215 (PDF 8, 9) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00032222, EFTA00032223
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: written attorney proffer followup · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Email transmittal date February 21; receipt acknowledged February 22

Seven-page response to follow-up questions and corrections from the February 13 attorney presentation, sent February 21 and acknowledged February 22.

Terms and limits: Submission expressly carries forward February 13 attorney-proffer terms; see related February 13 entry. It includes a correction to counsel’s earlier estimate and should not be treated as unchanged repetition.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Written continuation, not a separate live witness session. Date comes from transmittal chain; attachment itself lacks a new date.

• EFTA00025091 (PDF 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00025091, EFTA00025092, EFTA00025093, EFTA00025094, EFTA00025095, EFTA00025096, EFTA00025097
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00032215 (PDF 6) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00032220
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: proposed witness interview · proposal no completed proffer shown

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Government proposed a direct voluntary interview after the attorney proffer; March 16 discussion postponed in-person arrangements and June 4 internal email considered a telephone interview.

Terms and limits: Government indicated interview and each particular subject or question would be voluntary, with counsel consultation available; no new operative personal agreement in this chain.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Scheduling/history reference, not an additional completed 2020 witness proffer. Actual2021meeting separately verified.

• EFTA00032215 (PDF 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00032215, EFTA00032216, EFTA00032217, EFTA00032218, EFTA00032219, EFTA00032220
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: Attorney proffer declined · Declined at that time

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI; Epstein-Maxwell federal investigation

Date basis: Dated email embedded in July 7 chain.

UK counsel declined prosecutors’ request for an attorney proffer and instead favored hearing directly from her client. Discussions about a voluntary interview continued.

Terms and limits: No agreed criminal-proffer protection appears. Prosecutors separately emphasize voluntary participation and the ability to decline topics; those interview practices are not an executed immunity agreement.

Availability: Public released correspondence or notes; underlying agreement/complete session record not located in the cited source.

Interpretation: Preserve the client’s redaction and avoid biographical reconstruction. A Metropolitan Police complaint and later video-call scheduling do not establish a protected U.S. proffer.

• EFTA00017769 (PDF 3, 4, 10) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00017771, EFTA00017772, EFTA00017778
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed. PDF 10 supplies voluntary-interview/topic-choice language; text checked.

Record: Proposed proffer agreement and negotiated voluntary interview · Offered / negotiated; no completed proffer established by these sources

Case / agency: DOJ Office of International Affairs, SDNY and FBI; U.S.–UK mutual legal assistance request CRM-182-73090; Epstein and separate Nygard investigations

Date basis: Dates are request and negotiation dates, not completed interview dates. Draft EFTA00101307 has blank date/signature lines; 01.14.2019 footer is form version.

U.S. authorities sought a voluntary interview in the UK, with a compelled UK interview as an alternative. A draft agreement and later correspondence document contemplated protections; they do not show execution or testimony.

Terms and limits: April MLAT request offers a proffer letter on request. Undated named draft limits case-in-chief/sentencing use while preserving derivative leads, false-statement/perjury/obstruction exceptions, cross-examination and rebuttal. The August 10 email limits use/disclosure to a U.S.-government criminal investigation, prosecution, or related civil/asset-forfeiture action, absent a contrary court order. It rejects broader immunity and notes the right to decline questions or consult counsel.

Availability: MLAT request, attached blank form, named unsigned draft and terms-negotiation correspondence public.

Interpretation: Not a signed immunity or cooperation agreement. No 2019 proffer date can be inferred from the standard form footer. Ordinary foreign police interviews are not converted into U.S. proffers by sharing an investigation subject.

• EFTA00087994 (PDF 1, 8, 15, 16) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00087994, EFTA00088001, EFTA00088008, EFTA00088009
  Request date, named witness and proffer-letter offer visually checked on pp1 and 8; attached standard form text read at pp15–16.
• EFTA00101307 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00101307, EFTA00101308
  Both PDF pages visually checked: DRAFT watermark, blank meeting/date/signature lines, named participant and footer.
• EFTA00022201 (PDF 1, 3, 4) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00022201, EFTA00022203, EFTA00022204
  August 10 email p1 visually checked; July 31 requested protections and July 28 blank-form transmission read on pp3–4.

Record: Proposed personal proffer · Anticipated; completion unverified

Case / agency: FBI New York, Epstein / Deutsche Bank investigation

Date basis: FBI email dated August 4 reports engaging Morris the previous day and anticipates a proffer in the near future. August 3 is the contact date, not a proffer date.

Investigators told colleagues that a Morris proffer was likely in the near future and invited questions concerning the bank relationship.

Terms and limits: Morris had retained counsel; no agreement or use restrictions appear in the email.

Availability: Internal coordination email; no completed proffer, transcript, agreement or resulting FD-302 verified by this pass.

Interpretation: Do not merge with the September 2019 Deutsche Bank attorney presentation. Do not identify an unreleased banker interview sought by Senate investigators as Morris without primary corroboration. The source identifies Morris by surname; the first-name association rests on the related bank record, not redaction reversal.

• EFTA00037187 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00037187, EFTA00037188
  PDF p1 date, anticipatory wording and Bates stamp visually checked; related March 2020 bank-investigation thread read.

Record: Proffer agreement declined; interview preparation · No protected proffer established

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI; Epstein-Maxwell federal investigation

Date basis: Dated pre-interview call memorandum.

Counsel discussed an anticipated interview and the prosecutor described Lang as a witness. Counsel expressly said he did not want a proffer agreement.

Terms and limits: No proffer use restriction accepted in the recorded conversation.

Availability: Public released correspondence or notes; underlying agreement/complete session record not located in the cited source.

Interpretation: This is a comparison record explaining why a cooperative witness interview should not automatically be labeled a protected proffer. It does not establish that the upcoming interview was completed.

• EFTA01246709 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: 3501.129-005, EFTA01246709
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.

Record: Attorney proffer · Completed attorney proffer; email summary public

Case / agency: SDNY; subsequent FD-302 bears FBI case 50D-NY-3027571

Date basis: Contemporaneous email subject and timestamp explicitly date the call.

An SDNY email expressly records counsel providing an attorney proffer before planned interviews. The record summarizes potential first-hand evidence about Epstein and Maxwell.

Terms and limits: Attorney outlines topics the redacted client would cover in forthcoming interviews. No signed use-restriction agreement located in this source.

Availability: One-page attorney-proffer summary and related 29-page interview report.

Interpretation: Keep participant redacted. Do not adopt a third-party identification of this alleged survivor. The subsequent multi-day interview report does not itself label the interview a proffer in the reviewed opening; the attorney proffer is the indexed event. Do not treat a third-party London-location label as verified when location is redacted in the primary opening.

• EFTA01248576 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01248576
  Date, attorney-proffer description, complete redactions, 3501.210-006 code and Bates stamp visually verified.
• EFTA01248577 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01248577
  Related FD-302 read to check interview context and code; not treated as itself proving a protected proffer.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

FD-302 says Visoski discussed, signed and displayed the proffer agreement during video interview.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Report entered February 9,2021; actual meeting date October 7,2020.

• EFTA00159712 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159712
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00159723 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159723, EFTA00159724
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: attorney proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Two-page memo/email records counsel’s presentation of information Hatt wished to provide concerning Maxwell and Epstein.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The scanned heading says Hatt, not Hall. The source records allegations and proposed knowledge through counsel, not findings or necessarily a personal Hatt interview.

• EFTA01246379 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246379, EFTA01246380
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer continuation · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

October 7 agreement bears handwritten November 12 continuation; produced as3527-011.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Continuation of original agreement, not a new immunity/cooperation bargain.

• EFTA00159723 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159723, EFTA00159724
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00087727 (PDF 9) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00087735
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Agreement and FD-302 document video interview of coded client; agreement includes video-procedure addendum.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations. Video addendum prohibits recording/screenshots/copying supplied exhibits and use of outside materials without permission; requires identifying all participants and communicating when consulting counsel.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Identity remains redacted; addendum is a procedure agreement, not a separate proffer event.

• EFTA01245989 (PDF 1, 2, 3) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01245989, EFTA01245990, EFTA01245991
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01245979 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01245979
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: Attorney proffer call memorandum · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI, Epstein and Maxwell trafficking investigation

Date basis: Document heading or contemporaneous email date

The dated memorandum records a call to provide additional information since the client’s 2020 SDNY/FBI interview and says the client could be interviewed again.

Terms and limits: No proffer agreement or use restrictions are reproduced.

Availability: Cited released records available; no additional immunity terms inferred.

Interpretation: The earlier 2020 interview is not automatically a protected proffer.

• EFTA00011526 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Primary released PDF downloaded from public mirror; text and relevant page image inspected

Record: proffer agreement · agreement documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

April 27 agreement has August 19 continuation; the latter is corroborated by a same-date FD-302.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Continuation date is handwritten and visually checked. FD-302 entered September 29,2021; actual interview August 19.

• EFTA01249938 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01249938, EFTA01249939
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00017844 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00017844, EFTA00017845
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer continuation · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

July 12, 2019 proffer agreement represented by Joseph Nascimento, with this date recorded as the initial meeting or a continuation.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The participant’s name is redacted. Continuation dates read visually: 9/10/19, 5/14/21, 8/20/21, 9/30/21, 10/1/21, 11/5/21. Do not confuse report entry dates or production dates with interview dates.

• EFTA00028620 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00028620
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00159466 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159466, EFTA00159467
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00027643 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00027643, EFTA00027644
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Signed July 23 agreement and FD-302 establish a later Groff proffer with attorney Michael Bachner.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: FD-302 entered September 24, 2021 but investigation/interview date is July 23, 2021. This resolves the open question left by December 2019 refusal references.

• EFTA01682023 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01682023, EFTA01682024
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01246216 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01246216
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Agreement and FD-302 establish August 4 SDNY interview.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: FD-302 entry date August 9 differs from event date August 4. No survivor identity inferred.

• EFTA01249950 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01249950, EFTA01249951
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01249952 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01249952
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: attorney proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

Counsel described a witness’s allegations concerning Leon Black and willingness to speak with law enforcement.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The proffer is the witness’s lawyer speaking, not Leon Black proffering. Allegations are not adopted as proven; survivor remains unnamed.

• EFTA02731655 (PDF 1, 2, 3, 4) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA02731655, EFTA02731656, EFTA02731657, EFTA02731658
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

April 27 agreement has August 19 continuation; the latter is corroborated by a same-date FD-302.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Continuation date is handwritten and visually checked. FD-302 entered September 29,2021; actual interview August 19.

• EFTA01249938 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01249938, EFTA01249939
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA01249940 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01249940
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer continuation · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

July 12, 2019 proffer agreement represented by Joseph Nascimento, with this date recorded as the initial meeting or a continuation.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The participant’s name is redacted. Continuation dates read visually: 9/10/19, 5/14/21, 8/20/21, 9/30/21, 10/1/21, 11/5/21. Do not confuse report entry dates or production dates with interview dates.

• EFTA00159466 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159466, EFTA00159467
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00027643 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00027643, EFTA00027644
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: Attorney proffer call memorandum · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI, Epstein and Maxwell trafficking investigation

Date basis: Document heading or contemporaneous email date

The memorandum records an attorney call conveying supplemental recollections and availability of a witness list.

Terms and limits: No signed agreement or additional benefit is established.

Availability: Cited released records available; no additional immunity terms inferred.

Interpretation: This supplements discovery group 3501.479; it is not evidence of a new person.

• EFTA01249947 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Primary released PDF downloaded from public mirror; text and relevant page image inspected

Record: witness proffer continuation · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

July 12, 2019 proffer agreement represented by Joseph Nascimento, with this date recorded as the initial meeting or a continuation.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The participant’s name is redacted. Continuation dates read visually: 9/10/19, 5/14/21, 8/20/21, 9/30/21, 10/1/21, 11/5/21. Do not confuse report entry dates or production dates with interview dates.

• EFTA00159466 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159466, EFTA00159467
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00027643 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00027643, EFTA00027644
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer continuation · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

July 12, 2019 proffer agreement represented by Joseph Nascimento, with this date recorded as the initial meeting or a continuation.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The participant’s name is redacted. Continuation dates read visually: 9/10/19, 5/14/21, 8/20/21, 9/30/21, 10/1/21, 11/5/21. Do not confuse report entry dates or production dates with interview dates.

• EFTA00159466 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159466, EFTA00159467
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00027643 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00027643, EFTA00027644
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: witness proffer continuation · completed documented

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: Date stated in source

July 12, 2019 proffer agreement represented by Joseph Nascimento, with this date recorded as the initial meeting or a continuation.

Terms and limits: The SDNY agreement expressly says this is not a cooperation agreement and promises no plea, immunity, non-prosecution agreement, or favorable motion. It restricts direct use of meeting statements in the office’s case-in-chief/sentencing subject to stated exceptions; permits derivative investigative leads, cross-examination and rebuttal; excepts false statements/obstruction/perjury and fugitive status; permits use in specified sentence-reduction applications consistent with First Step Act section 402 and waives constitutional/statutory/rule suppression objections to contractually permitted uses; binds another requesting prosecutor to its provisions; applies only to the meeting and listed continuations.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: The participant’s name is redacted. Continuation dates read visually: 9/10/19, 5/14/21, 8/20/21, 9/30/21, 10/1/21, 11/5/21. Do not confuse report entry dates or production dates with interview dates.

• EFTA00040163 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00040163
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00159466 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00159466, EFTA00159467
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.
• EFTA00027643 (PDF 1, 2) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00027643, EFTA00027644
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.

Record: Client proffer documented by FD-302 · Completed, document-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI, MCC-related inquiry; case number redacted

Date basis: Interview date on FD-302, unless the entry specifies a different source

The first page explicitly records a briefing on proffer-agreement terms before an interview about MCC work and the disturbance-control team.

Terms and limits: Terms were briefed but the underlying agreement is not reproduced.

Availability: Released eight-page FD-302.

Interpretation: The case number is redacted. The content identifies MCC/BOP context; no identity is inferred.

• EFTA00040864 (PDF 1–8) · PDF mirror
  PDF text and relevant page image inspected; public mirror, not compared byte-for-byte with age-gated DOJ copy

Record: Personal DOJ proffer under one signed agreement · Completed, agreement and transcripts available

Case / agency: U.S. Department of Justice; meeting at USAO Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee; related U.S. v. Maxwell, 1:20-cr-00330 (SDNY)

Date basis: Agreement and transcript headings; one engagement, two daily sessions.

One two-day engagement. The current official release has five PDFs and sixteen WAV assets; tests, transcript formats and recording parts are not separate proffers.

Terms and limits: Limited direct-use restrictions with derivative-evidence, cross-examination, rebuttal, false-statement, obstruction, perjury, fugitive and specified sentence-reduction exceptions. No cooperation, immunity, plea, nonprosecution or sentence-reduction promise. Paragraph 8 continues the agreement to July 25.

Availability: Five released PDF assets inspected. All sixteen original official WAV headers checked; complete audio not auditioned. Current EFTA audio crosswalk corroborated, not byte-verified.

Interpretation: Statements are Maxwell’s account, not independent corroboration. The transcript opening gives false-statement warnings; do not describe it as sworn testimony.

• EFTA02846680 (PDF 1–6) · PDF mirror · Primary source
  Public, redacted. Original DOJ PDF downloaded; EFTA-stamped mirror downloaded and first-page/layout visually checked. Current DOJ EFTA download redirects to age verification.
• EFTA02846943 (PDF same transcript, condensed format) · PDF mirror · Primary source
  Public, redacted. Original DOJ PDF downloaded; EFTA-stamped mirror downloaded and first-page/layout visually checked. Current DOJ EFTA download redirects to age verification.
• EFTA02847046 (PDF 1–3) · PDF mirror · Primary source
  Public, redacted. Original DOJ PDF downloaded; EFTA-stamped mirror downloaded and first-page/layout visually checked. Current DOJ EFTA download redirects to age verification.
• EFTA02847203 (PDF same transcript, condensed format) · PDF mirror · Primary source
  Public, redacted. Original DOJ PDF downloaded; EFTA-stamped mirror downloaded and first-page/layout visually checked. Current DOJ EFTA download redirects to age verification.
• EFTA02847269 (PDF 1–2) · PDF mirror · Primary source
  Public redacted two-page instrument. EFTA-stamped mirror downloaded; both pages visually checked. Official direct download age-gated.

Record: Conditional congressional testimony offer (not completed proffer) · Conditional offer

Case / agency: House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

Date basis: Dated three-page counsel letter to Chairman James Comer.

The letter proposes conditions for congressional cooperation and an alternative clemency-dependent offer to testify publicly. It supplies no new completed proffer session.

Terms and limits: Counsel requested formal immunity, a location outside prison, questions in advance, and delay until Supreme Court/habeas proceedings concluded. Alternatively counsel offered public testimony if clemency were granted.

Availability: Full counsel letter public.

Interpretation: Keep separate from July 24–25 DOJ proffer interviews. Conditions requested are not benefits granted. February 9 2026 repetition is a further lead; original statement existence authenticated but full original text was not retrieved in this review.

• Primary record (PDF 1, 2, 3)
  Primary counsel letter preserved on news-site PDF mirror; all pages text read, p2 visually verified; signed counsel names and date present.

Record: Congressional written-proffer offer · Offered instead of live testimony; rejected in committee response

Case / agency: House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Epstein inquiry

Date basis: November 21 committee letter quotes and cites November 3 counsel letter.

Counsel asked the Committee to accept a written proffer of the Clintons’ information. The committee declined the requested substitute for in-person questioning.

Terms and limits: Counsel proposed written information instead of live testimony. No criminal-proffer use protection or immunity agreement established.

Availability: Public committee response quoting offer; original November 3 letter not independently located in this pass.

Interpretation: This is congressional testimony-format correspondence, not a DOJ queen-for-a-day agreement. Rejection of written-only testimony does not establish guilt or obstruction beyond what any separate proceeding determines.

• Primary record (PDF 1, 2)
  Official three-page Committee letter downloaded; p1 visually checked, pp1–2 read; offer and rejection explicit.

Record: Brief attorney proffer documented in memorandum · Completed, memo-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI; Epstein-Maxwell federal investigation

Date basis: January 19 email memorializes a logistics call and counsel’s brief factual presentation; exact call time not separately stated.

A prosecutor’s note about arranging an Eva Dubin interview expressly describes a brief attorney proffer about what counsel understood her client had observed.

Terms and limits: No signed proffer agreement or specific use restriction appears. The memo does not make counsel’s assertions sworn testimony or independently established facts.

Availability: Public released correspondence or notes; underlying agreement/complete session record not located in the cited source.

Interpretation: Keep counsel and other redacted people unnamed. This is counsel’s presentation before the planned client interview, not proof that the client herself gave a protected proffer.

• EFTA01245787 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: 3501.059-002, EFTA01245787
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.

Record: Personal voluntary proffer (retrospectively confirmed by counsel) · Reported completed in official congressional transcript; underlying record unavailable in this pass

Case / agency: Office of the Attorney General, U.S. Virgin Islands; financial/tax and JPMorgan-related banking inquiry as described by counsel

Date basis: June 10 congressional testimony retrospectively describes a prior USVI voluntary proffer, without its date.

At Gates’s June 10 House interview, his lawyer stated Gates sat for a voluntary proffer with USVI representatives. Counsel described financial/tax and banking-related subject matter.

Terms and limits: Counsel Tom Clare described voluntary cooperation, document production and a voluntary proffer. No written agreement, immunity protection or formal case identifier disclosed in the cited passage.

Availability: Official transcript publicly documents counsel’s confirmation; underlying USVI proffer recording/notes/agreement not located.

Interpretation: The June 10 congressional interview is the source of confirmation, not the date of the USVI proffer. Do not describe this as an SDNY proffer or a criminal cooperation agreement. USVI is a U.S. territory, not a foreign jurisdiction.

• Primary record (PDF 1, 131)
  Official 138-page transcript downloaded; June 10 date read on p1; p131 lines5–14 visually verified.

Record: Attorney proffer referenced in email · Completed, reference-confirmed

Case / agency: SDNY / FBI; Epstein-Maxwell federal investigation

Date basis: July 28 contemporaneous email retrospectively references counsel’s attorney proffer.

An internal exchange says Visoski’s counsel had supplied an attorney proffer concerning a potential CBP connection. The reply cautions against calling the lead promising.

Terms and limits: No operative agreement or use restrictions supplied.

Availability: Public released correspondence or notes; underlying agreement/complete session record not located in the cited source.

Interpretation: Do not confuse this attorney presentation with Visoski’s October 7 and November 12 personal proffers. The source expressly tempers speculation about the CBP contact; it does not establish wrongdoing.

• EFTA00066570 (PDF 1) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA00066570
  Public released-record PDF downloaded; relevant text and cited page image checked, including EFTA stamp. No comparison to age-gated DOJ copy claimed.

Record: aggregate proffer inventory reference · undated unmatched reference not additional count

Case / agency: USAO SDNY/FBI; Epstein trafficking investigation 31E/50D-NY-3027571; United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 / United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, as applicable.

Date basis: No reliable meeting dates recoverable from visible excerpt

FBI activity-log excerpt contains multiple lines stating interviews occurred pursuant to proffer agreements; participant names and meeting dates are redacted or cut off.

Terms and limits: No operative proffer agreement or complete negotiated terms located for this event. Do not infer immunity, non-prosecution, cooperation status, oath, or truth of the underlying claims.

Availability: Public redacted primary record, inspected through a public mirror. DOJ direct source was age-gated on review; age verification not submitted.

Interpretation: Underlying records are not conclusively matched. Entries may overlap dated sessions already indexed. This is one aggregate reference row, not a count of additional interviews.

• EFTA01684300 (PDF 17) · PDF mirror
  Page stamps: EFTA01684316
  Downloaded primary-record PDF; extracted text inspected. Listed screenshot pages visually checked against scan; other cited pages text-checked only.