Skip to main content
Search
< All Topics
Print

A Source Guide to Maxwell’s October 2026 Exhibits

Updated
ByEpsteinWiki
Views2

Maxwell’s October 21, 2026 filing contains historical records, excerpts, reproductions and argument, not one uniform body of newly created evidence. This guide maps the attachments and identifies source and citation problems that matter when interpreting them.

Editorial graphic showing the actual Batch 4 exhibit index alongside a source guide label for the six-file, 435-page submission filed October 21, 2026.

Snapshot

  • Six PDFs contain 435 pages, including emails, dividers, duplicate pages and argument.
  • The numbered batches contain 99 entries: Exhibits 1 through 93, four decimal subexhibits, and repeated labels 57 and 58 in separate batches.
  • A separate judicial-notice collection uses letters A through F and is not assembled in alphabetical order.
  • PDF pages, original transcript pages, Bates identifiers, trial exhibit numbers and reconsideration exhibit labels identify different things.
  • Filing an attachment does not turn a party’s allegation or an editorial annotation into a judicial finding.

Original records and reproductions

The attached materials take several forms:

  • Document images reproduce the appearance of a record, but the copy alone does not establish an independent chain of custody.
  • Transcript excerpts give the words on the included pages, not the missing surrounding testimony.
  • Privilege logs identify communications claimed to be privileged without revealing their contents.
  • Court orders record judicial decisions. A party’s brief requests or argues for an outcome.
  • Researcher transcriptions, annotations and citation guides are added layers, not original official findings.

Exhibit 15 is a clear example of an added layer. It places a transcription attributed to EFTA00800336 beneath commentary referring to “Claude’s analysis” and a tentative caller-identification theory. The commentary should not be attributed to the Department of Justice. The visible reference does not establish who created every other filing or whether the underlying note is accurate.

Exhibit 30 is also reformatted text rather than an original email-image facsimile. The later batch’s Exhibit 57 contains visibly garbled, reflowed agreement text. Those copies may help locate source material, but cannot independently authenticate original signatures or resolve exact wording where text is corrupted.

Citation corrections that affect interpretation

Exhibits 82 and 83 reproduce the same trial transcript page, numbered 869, concerning a foundation objection during Juan Alessi’s testimony. They are not pages 17 and 18 or page 53 of docket entry 869. Similar-looking numbers here point to different documents.

Exhibits 84 through 86 contain grand-jury transcript pages 99, 102 and 103, not the index’s pages 111, 114 and 115. The included pages show earlier testimony, the transition to Gregory Parkinson’s testimony, and his professional background. They do not contain the cited passages about the table’s seizure or bedroom configuration.

The Alessi transcript sheet in Exhibit 80 contains four transcript pages. The indexed lines at page 806 concern a brief island visit, but nearby page 808 does place receipt of a written rules booklet in 2001, possibly 2002. The same passage describes earlier oral instructions. The passage dates receipt of the written booklet, not the start of all household rules.

Exhibit 81 similarly places the eye-contact instruction near the end of Alessi’s service, at transcript page 784, lines 20 through 25. The indexed lines 9 through 12 concern his earlier relationship with Epstein, not that instruction.

The first batch’s Exhibit 52 is a prosecutor-letter page. It is not trial exhibit GX 52, the address book. Nor is it the sentencing-transcript material described elsewhere with another “Exhibit 52” reference. The identifying document and page must accompany the number.

Repetition is not independent corroboration

Exhibit 12 reappears as Exhibit 58 in the same file. Other repeated material includes Exhibit 31 within Exhibit 51 and Exhibits 42 and 50 within Exhibit 47. In the later file, Exhibit 61 and its four decimal subexhibits reproduce the same sentencing page five times. Several excerpts from the August 2026 ruling also overlap.

The repetition helps explain the packet’s size. It does not turn one underlying account into several independent sources. Likewise, the attached excerpts from the prior judgment remain the court’s earlier rejection of claims, not decisions granting the later reconsideration request.

Scope of the inventory

Each entry identifies the type of record and its original date, where one appears. Missing dates are not inferred from the October 2026 filing stamp. Redactions are preserved, and protected identities are not inferred from surrounding details. Page links point to the actual filed PDFs, not the sometimes inaccurate page numbers in the exhibit indexes.

Main papers

First two exhibit batches, ECF 874-2

  • Exhibit 1, PDF 3 through 27: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Agent search-affidavit copy and Attachment A; September 2019, day blank. EFTA00101221 through 00101245.
  • Exhibit 2, PDF 29: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Page 2 of letter to Jay Lefkowitz and Roy Black, Aug.21, 2008; signed for U.S. Attorney Acosta by AUSA Villafaña. EFTA00190379.
  • Exhibit 3, PDF 31: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Prosecutor/FBI email chain, May29, 2008. EFTA00190432.
  • Exhibit 4, PDF 33: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Page 14 of prosecutor letter; exact date absent. EFTA00190465.
  • Exhibit 5, PDF 35: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Closing page 16 of same apparent correspondence; exact date absent. EFTA00190467.
  • Exhibit 6, PDF 37: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Internal USAO/FBI emails, June23, 2008. EFTA00190477.
  • Exhibit 7, PDF 39: Privilege-log page facsimile. Privilege-log p.8 of 14; entries Sept.2007 through Feb.2011; log date absent. EFTA00191257.
  • Exhibit 8, PDF 41: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. “Epstein Investigation Timeline,” p.12 of 51; events Aug.30 through Sept.10, 2007. EFTA00224954.
  • Exhibit 9, PDF 43: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Lefkowitz/Villafaña emails Aug.14 through 15, 2008. EFTA00190374.
  • Exhibit 10, PDF 45: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Deposition/interview transcript, original p.267; date absent. EFTA00009083.
  • Exhibit 11, PDF 47: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Deposition/interview transcript, original p.299; date absent. EFTA00009115.
  • Exhibit 12, PDF 49: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Deposition/interview transcript, original p.286; date absent. EFTA00009102.
  • Exhibit 13, PDF 51: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Deposition/interview transcript, original p.407 by continuation; date absent. EFTA00009223.
  • Exhibit 14, PDF 53: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Following transcript page, original p.408; date absent. EFTA00009224.
  • Exhibit 15, PDF 55 through 56: Annotated/reformatted transcription; not original facsimile. Researcher-formatted transcription attributed to EFTA00800336, purported call memo March12, 2009; researcher annotation undated.
  • Exhibit 16, PDF 58: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Email forwarding spreadsheet request, March 22, 2010. EFTA00207136.
  • Exhibit 17, PDF 60: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Investigation timeline, p.49 of 51; 2009 entries. EFTA00224991.
  • Exhibit 18, PDF 62: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Civil-litigation narrative quoting Aug.4, 2010 bankruptcy hearing; document date absent. EFTA01107629.
  • Exhibit 19, PDF 64: Privilege-log page facsimile. Law-firm privilege log dated Feb.23, 2011, 2009 entries. EFTA02766464.
  • Exhibit 20, PDF 66: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Allred/SDNY correspondence Oct.18 through 21, 2019. EFTA00010265.
  • Exhibit 21, PDF 68 through 69: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Victim-services/civil-counsel email Apr.29, 2020 and reply, date partly absent. EFTA00153657 through 58.
  • Exhibit 22, PDF 71: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. FBI/USAO email July 21, 2008. EFTA00190574.
  • Exhibit 23, PDF 73: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. FBI Victim Services email Oct.1, 2019. EFTA01649960.
  • Exhibit 24, PDF 75 through 76: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Forwarded FBI invitation, Sept.27 through 30, 2019. EFTA01649965 through 66.
  • Exhibit 25, PDF 78 through 79: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. FBI/provider email chain Apr.24 through May8, 2020. EFTA01650808 through 09.
  • Exhibit 26, PDF 81 through 82: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Scarola/SDNY/court-reporting chain Sept.7 through 10, 2020 and undated top reply. EFTA00023751 through 52.
  • Exhibit 27, PDF 84: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Forwarded media material and internal email March14, 2011. EFTA00206285.
  • Exhibit 28, PDF 86: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Mail disclaimer and internal “Preliminary Investigation” email March9, 2011. EFTA00206294.
  • Exhibit 29, PDF 88: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Estate-counsel/SDNY scheduling chain Nov.9, 2020. EFTA00019129.
  • Exhibit 30, PDF 90 through 91: Reformatted text-layer reproduction; not original facsimile. Formatted corpus text-layer reproduction of Estate/SDNY emails July 26 through 27, 2020. EFTA00020668 through 69.
  • Exhibit 31, PDF 93: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. FBI/SDNY discovery email Aug.19, 2020. EFTA00026743.
  • Exhibit 32, PDF 95: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Bradley Edwards counterclaim exhibit list, p.5 of 11, date absent. EFTA01085223.
  • Exhibit 33, PDF 97: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Grand-jury transcript excerpt, internal GM_GJ_SDNY_00000400; date absent. EFTA00008928.
  • Exhibit 34, PDF 99: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Grand-jury transcript June29, 2020, p.27; GM_GJ_SDNY_00000418. EFTA00008946.
  • Exhibit 35, PDF 101: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Email exchange Apr.29, 2014. EFTA01660401.
  • Exhibit 36, PDF 103 through 104: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. FBI internal reporting email Aug.25, 2019. EFTA00037556 through 57.
  • Exhibit 37, PDF 106: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. FBI Criminal Investigative Division Aug.15, 2019 situation report, first of three selected pages. EFTA00173201.
  • Exhibit 38, PDF 108: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Following report page. EFTA00173202.
  • Exhibit 39, PDF 110: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Following report page. EFTA00173203.
  • Exhibit 40, PDF 112: Privilege-log page facsimile. Feb.23, 2011 privilege-log p.16; 2009 entries. EFTA02766477.
  • Exhibit 41, PDF 114: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Government memorandum excerpt p.37, summarizing July13, 2019 interview of household manager Juan Alessi; document date absent. EFTA_00022497 / EFTA02731118.
  • Exhibit 42, PDF 116: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Estate/SDNY chain Apr.12 through 22, 2021. EFTA00023207.
  • Exhibit 43, PDF 118: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Estate/SDNY correspondence Sept.11 through 14, 2020. EFTA00023702.
  • Exhibit 44, PDF 120: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Criminal trial direct-examination excerpt, transcript p.2092; date absent.
  • Exhibit 45, PDF 122: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Same trial witness’s cross-examination excerpt, transcript p.2141; date absent.
  • Exhibit 46, PDF 124: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Trial records-witness cross-examination, transcript p.2517; date absent.
  • Exhibit 47, PDF 126 through 134: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Estate/SDNY email chain March31 through Oct.24, 2021. EFTA00023202 through 10.
  • Exhibit 48, PDF 136: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Questionnaire response, original p.30 of 58, date and respondent title absent. EFTA00225073.
  • Exhibit 49, PDF 138: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Deposition/interview transcript original p.296; date absent. EFTA00009112.
  • Exhibit 50, PDF 140: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Estate email chain Apr.12, 2021 with March31 scheduling. EFTA00023208.
  • Exhibit 51, PDF 142 through 148: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. FBI/SDNY discovery correspondence Aug.18 through 20, 2020. EFTA00026741 through 47.
  • Exhibit 52, PDF 150: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Prosecutor-letter p.13, exact date absent. EFTA00190464.
  • Exhibit 53, PDF 152: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Victim-side CVRA court filing, S.D. Fla. 9:08-cv-80736, Doc.19, Aug.1, 2008, p.8. EFTA00190604.
  • Exhibit 54, PDF 154: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Same Aug.1, 2008 pleading, p.13. EFTA00190609.
  • Exhibit 55, PDF 156: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Internal prosecutor-email continuation, date absent; discusses July9, 2008 letter. EFTA00190614.
  • Exhibit 56, PDF 158: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. AUSA/FBI email April 27, 2016. EFTA00211693.
  • Exhibit 57, PDF 160: Document-page facsimile/reproduction. Questionnaire response, p.41 of 58; document date absent, describes 2006 through 08 events. EFTA00225084.
  • Exhibit 58, PDF 162: Transcript-page facsimile excerpt. Same transcript page as Ex.12, EFTA00009102.

Third exhibit batch, ECF 874-4

  • Exhibit 57, PDF 4 through 5: Reflowed text attributed to House Oversight NPA records; historical 2007 agreement material. Visible labels include HOUSE OVERSIGHT 012592 through 012598. A trailing, separate letter/fax fragment is dated August 31, 2007. The index uses a different/inconsistent identifier, “H.O.021593 (012593-683).”
  • Exhibit 58, PDF 7: EFTA00009151, transcript p. 335, attributed in Maxwell’s accompanying motion to Acosta’s 2019 OPR interview. The excerpt has no date or witness-identification cover.
  • Exhibit 59, PDF 9 through 10: EFTA00153653 through 54; forwarded email chain with April 29, 2020 messages and an April 30, 2020 02:31:49 +0000 forwarding timestamp.
  • Exhibit 60, PDF 12: EFTA00190378; first page of a USAO Southern District of Florida letter to Jay Lefkowitz and Roy Black, August 21, 2008. No signature page is included.
  • Exhibit 61, PDF 14: “Exhibit 52 p.11,” sentencing transcript p. 11, reporter code M6SQmax1; date absent on this excerpt.
  • Exhibit 61.1, PDF 16: Same sentencing-transcript p. 11; date absent.
  • Exhibit 61.2, PDF 18: Same sentencing-transcript p. 11; date absent.
  • Exhibit 61.3, PDF 20: Same sentencing-transcript p. 11; date absent.
  • Exhibit 61.4, PDF 22: Same sentencing-transcript p. 11; date absent.
  • Exhibit 62, PDF 24: “Exhibit 52 p.13,” sentencing transcript p. 13; date absent.
  • Exhibit 63, PDF 26: “Exhibit 52 p.14,” sentencing transcript p. 14; date absent.
  • Exhibit 64, PDF 28 through 29: Dkt. 869 pp. 22 through 23; August 2026 judicial opinion.
  • Exhibit 65, PDF 31: Dkt. 869 p. 29; August 2026 opinion discussing August 2008 emails.
  • Exhibit 66, PDF 33: Dkt. 869 p. 65 and footnotes 24 through 25; August 2026 opinion.
  • Exhibit 67, PDF 35 through 36: EFTA00009424 through 25, transcript pp. 196 through 197, attributed in the motion to Acosta’s 2019 OPR interview; date/witness cover absent. Discusses September 24, 2007 NPA edits.
  • Exhibit 68, PDF 38 through 42: FBI Special Agent Christina J. Pryor affidavit supporting a criminal complaint against Alfredo Rodriguez; original case 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ, Document 3, original docket pp. 2 through 6 of 7. Entered December 9, 2009; jurat appears to read December 1, 2009. Internally described as “Exhibit 97” in the batch index.
  • Exhibit 69, PDF 44 through 48: Dkt. 869 pp. 30 through 34; August 2026 opinion.
  • Exhibit 70, PDF 50 through 53: Dkt. 869 pp. 46 through 49; August 2026 opinion.
  • Exhibit 71, PDF 55 through 57: Dkt. 869 pp. 49 through 51; August 2026 opinion.
  • Exhibit 72, PDF 59: Dkt. 869 p. 53; August 2026 opinion.
  • Exhibit 73, PDF 61 through 64: Dkt. 869 pp. 54 through 57; August 2026 opinion.
  • Exhibit 74, PDF 66 through 67: Dkt. 869 pp. 59 through 60; August 2026 opinion discussing 2005 search, 2006 grand-jury testimony, 2021 trial, and July 2024 release.
  • Exhibit 75, PDF 69 through 71: Dkt. 869 pp. 62 through 64; August 2026 opinion.
  • Exhibit 76, PDF 73 through 75: Dkt. 869 pp. 65 through 67; August 2026 opinion; footer filed August 24, concluding date August 25.
  • Exhibit 77, PDF 77: Dkt. 869 p. 66; August 2026 opinion.
  • Exhibit 78, PDF 79 through 80: EFTA02731146 through 47; underlying stamps EFTA_00022525 through 26; internal prosecution memorandum pp. 65 through 66, marked privileged/work product/deliberative process and Rule 6(e). Exact memo date absent; text describes July through September 2019 activity and ongoing review.

Fourth exhibit batch, ECF 874-5

  • Exhibit 79, PDF 4: 2021 Maxwell trial, rebuttal summation by prosecutor Maurene Comey; printed transcript p.3012. Exact session date is not printed in the crop.
  • Exhibit 80, PDF 6: December 2, 2021 trial testimony, Juan Alessi direct examination; four-up transcript pp.805 through 808.
  • Exhibit 81, PDF 8: December 2, 2021 trial testimony, Alessi direct; four-up transcript pp.781 through 784.
  • Exhibit 82, PDF 10: 2021 trial transcript, Alessi direct, printed p.869. The crop omits the session date; its transcript segment matches the December 2 material.
  • Exhibit 83, PDF 12: Same trial page as EX82.
  • Exhibit 84, PDF 14: 2006 Florida grand-jury transcript excerpt, printed p.99; excerpt itself undated.
  • Exhibit 85, PDF 16: 2006 Florida grand-jury transcript, printed p.102; excerpt undated.
  • Exhibit 86, PDF 18: 2006 Florida grand-jury transcript, printed p.103; excerpt undated.
  • Exhibit 87, PDF 20: November 2020 OPR report, screenshot of printed p.168 and n.242; date supplied by report identification, not by this crop.
  • Exhibit 88, PDF 22: November 2020 OPR report, screenshot of printed p.37 and n.59.
  • Exhibit 89, PDF 24: April 23, 2021 government letter, Maxwell Dkt.239, only p.5 of 6.
  • Exhibit 90, PDF 26 through 58: October 29, 2021 FBI memorandum supporting summary judgment, Radar Online LLC v. FBI, 17-cv-3956, Dkt.38, all 33 docket pages; printed i through viii and 1 through 25.
  • Exhibit 91, PDF 60 through 93: April 16, 2021 Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan, Maxwell Dkt.207, all 34 pages.
  • Exhibit 92, PDF 95 through 102: October 7, 2020 government letter, Maxwell Dkt.63, all 8 pages.
  • Exhibit 93, PDF 104 through 109: August 10, 2020 defense letter motion by Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell, Maxwell Dkt.38, all 6 pages.

Judicial-notice exhibits, ECF 874-3

The request’s exhibit list provides the letters used here. The order in the attachment differs, and both attribution attachments internally use “Exhibit B.”

  • Exhibit A, PDF pages 6 and 7: Google Earth historical view displaying October 5, 1997, plus citation notes. The screenshot also bears a June 24, 2026 filing stamp from ECF 861-3.
  • Exhibit B, PDF pages 4 and 5: USGS attribution capture and accompanying text for the historical view labeled 1997; reconfirmation date stated as September 13, 2026.
  • Exhibit C, PDF pages 8 and 9: Google Earth historical view displaying July 31, 2005, plus citation notes; also stamped from the earlier ECF 861-3 filing.
  • Exhibit D, PDF pages 2 and 3: NMRGIS attribution capture and accompanying text for the view labeled 2005. The attachment calls itself Exhibit B despite the request assigning it letter D.
  • Exhibit E, PDF pages 10 through 14: Cover and four selected pages from the New Mexico Survivors’ Truth Commission report dated August 5, 2026. Original pages 36 through 39 appear in reverse order.
  • Exhibit F, PDF pages 15 through 34: Redacted Florida court-record material and citation guides. This is separate from the ranch chronology.

The historical imagery controls and attribution panels should not be treated as exact capture-date certificates. Their displayed date boundaries, visible structures, added captions, and the report’s construction account are distinct pieces of information. None alone determines witness credibility.

Related coverage

Sources

Posted
ByEpsteinWiki
Previous Zoning & Property Use Cases
Next Aviation Records Litigation
Table of Contents