Skip to main content
Print

Fleur Perry Lang

Snapshot

Field Documented Information
NameFleur Perry Lang
Name variationsFleur, Fleur PerryLang, Fleur Perry-Lang
Known backgroundParis-born woman publicly identified as the former wife of chef Adam Perry Lang
Epstein connectionNamed passenger in historical Epstein flight records
Relevant relationshipFormer spouse of Adam Perry Lang, who worked as Epstein’s chef
Evidence periodAugust 16, 2001, through February 10, 2002, for the five identified flights
Identified flightsFive flight segments
AircraftBoeing 727, registration N908JE
LocationsAlbuquerque, Palm Beach, White Plains, St. Thomas, Saint Lucia, Paris
Primary flight evidenceHistorical aviation logs, including the exhibit filed in Giuffre v. Maxwell
Related FBI documentsEFTA01246710 and EFTA00159180
Investigative classificationDocumented flight-log passenger, related employee-family context
Legal statusNo verified charge, conviction, or judicial finding of involvement in Epstein’s offenses identified in the reviewed evidence
Research cutoffOctober 12, 2026

Who Is Fleur Perry Lang?

Fleur Perry Lang is publicly identified as the former wife of American chef Adam Perry Lang, who worked for Jeffrey Epstein during the late 1990s and early 2000s.

The Los Angeles Times profile of Adam Perry Lang’s family described Fleur as Paris-born and identified her as his wife in 2016. The couple later divorced.

The accompanying Los Angeles Times photograph collection provides additional independent identification through published family photographs.

Fleur’s appearance in the Epstein documentary record is principally connected to historical flight logs rather than a documented employment contract, personal financial transaction, or identified position inside Epstein’s organization.

She appears on several trips during the years when Adam Perry Lang worked as Epstein’s chef.

The records do not independently establish her occupation during that period, the purpose of each journey, or whether she had a personal relationship with Epstein separate from her husband’s employment.

Her family relationship to an Epstein employee cannot be used to attribute that employee’s activities, observations, or responsibilities to her.

Adam Perry Lang’s Employment by Jeffrey Epstein

The FBI interview beginning EFTA01246710 records Adam Perry Lang’s account of working as Epstein’s chef from approximately 1998 until 2002.

The interview was conducted by video conference on September 25, 2020, and documented in an FBI FD-302 report entered into the investigative record in February 2021.

The report is five pages long, covering EFTA01246710 through EFTA01246714.

These are five pages of one interview report, not five separate interviews.

Hiring and Responsibilities

Adam told investigators that he entered Epstein’s employment after working in restaurants. He described an interview and cooking audition arranged through Ghislaine Maxwell.

His duties included preparing meals, organizing provisions, serving food to guests, and supporting food service during travel.

He described substantial work at Epstein’s Manhattan residence as well as work associated with other properties and aircraft.

According to his account, Maxwell and Epstein’s assistant Lesley Groff exercised supervisory responsibilities over different aspects of his employment.

These responsibilities concerned Adam. No corresponding employment record has been verified showing Fleur performed the same duties.

Work at Epstein’s Properties

In EFTA01246711, Adam described the Manhattan working environment, household arrangements, and his interactions with employees and guests.

The broader interview discusses Epstein’s other properties and the travel associated with chef duties.

Adam’s descriptions explain why his name frequently appears in flight records involving Manhattan, Florida, the Virgin Islands, and New Mexico.

However, his employment at a property does not independently establish Fleur’s presence there.

Observations and Knowledge

The FBI interview’s third page discusses Adam’s recollections of women present at Epstein’s properties and questions about massage appointments and household activity.

Adam stated that he had not understood the criminal nature of Epstein’s conduct during his employment.

He also described seeing a nude woman while working in the Virgin Islands.

These are Adam’s reported recollections, not independent findings about what every employee or visitor observed.

No reliable basis exists to assign his statements or observations to Fleur.

What the FBI Interview Reveals About Adam’s Wife

The fourth page of Adam’s interview, EFTA01246713, contains an important biographical detail.

When discussing his departure from Epstein’s employment in 2002, Adam said that his wife had graduated from college, that his back problems had improved, and that he wanted to pursue his own business opportunities.

The document establishes what Adam told federal investigators about the circumstances surrounding his career change.

However, the passage does not identify the college, course of study, degree, or exact graduation date.

It should therefore not be used to create an unsupported educational history for Fleur.

Adam also told investigators that leaving Epstein’s employment was a major professional decision and that Epstein did not appear particularly concerned when he gave notice.

Adam’s Later Contact With Epstein

The final page of the FBI interview records Adam describing later business-related conversations with Epstein.

He said Epstein offered business advice after Adam left his employment.

Adam also described an incident involving a massage therapist he referred to Epstein.

These accounts concern Adam’s actions and recollections.

They do not establish that Fleur participated in his later business discussions or maintained contact with Epstein after the identified 2002 flight.

David Rodgers’ FBI Interview and the Initials AP

A separate important source is the FBI interview of pilot David Rodgers, beginning EFTA00159180.

Rodgers discussed his long employment relationship with Epstein and clarified how he identified individuals in his historical flight logs.

He specifically stated that he used the initials AP for Adam Perry and that Prince Andrew was written out by name.

This correction is significant because older flight-log compilations sometimes describe AP as potentially meaning Adam Perry Lang or Alberto Pinto, or incorrectly associate those initials with Prince Andrew.

Rodgers’ clarification provides direct evidence of the pilot’s intended abbreviation in the relevant records.

Nevertheless, AP identifies Adam rather than Fleur. It cannot be used by itself to add Fleur to a flight on which her own name is not recorded.

Complete Identified Flight Record

Five flight segments involving Fleur Perry Lang have been identified in the historical records reviewed.

The Giuffre v. Maxwell flight exhibit, Document 153-2, filed May 11, 2016, provides a judicially filed compilation of relevant flight records.

That exhibit includes passenger names, aircraft identifiers, dates, routes, flight numbers within the compilation, and Giuffre Bates references.

The flight chronology below distinguishes documented aviation entries from later interpretation.

Date Departure Arrival Aircraft
August 16, 2001Albuquerque, NMPalm Beach, FLN908JE
August 19, 2001Palm Beach, FLWhite Plains, NYN908JE
December 26, 2001St. Thomas, USVISaint LuciaN908JE
December 26, 2001Saint LuciaPalm Beach, FLN908JE
February 10, 2002White Plains, NYParis Le Bourget, FranceN908JE

These five segments are the currently identified appearances in the reviewed aviation records. Their inclusion does not establish that every possible document or passenger-name variation in the wider corpus has been located.

August 16, 2001: Albuquerque to Palm Beach

The earliest identified flight involving Fleur is dated August 16, 2001.

The Boeing 727 departed Albuquerque, New Mexico, and traveled to Palm Beach, Florida.

The relevant court-filed flight compilation identifies the entry as flight 6 within its tabulated sequence and associates it with Giuffre Bates number 000751.

The listed passengers include Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Emmy Tayler, Adam Perry Lang identified through the initials AP, and Fleur.

This entry documents a name associated with a flight leaving Albuquerque.

It does not establish that Fleur stayed at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, how long she was in New Mexico, or why she traveled.

New Mexico and Zorro Ranch

Albuquerque was a regional aviation gateway for Epstein’s New Mexico property, Zorro Ranch.

Consequently, the August 2001 flight is relevant to the broader research into the ranch’s travel network, employees, visitors, and property operations.

Adam Perry Lang’s FBI interview independently documents his work for Epstein, including duties connected with travel and residences.

However, the presence of Fleur’s name on an Albuquerque departure does not conclusively place her inside the ranch.

Confirming her presence at the property would require evidence such as dated photographs, transportation records, contemporaneous correspondence, visitor information, or reliable witness testimony.

The aircraft’s preceding itinerary also cannot be substituted for Fleur’s individual travel history. A passenger identified on August 16 should not automatically be added to every earlier segment traveled by the same aircraft.

August 19, 2001: Palm Beach to White Plains

On August 19, 2001, N908JE traveled from Palm Beach International Airport to Westchester County Airport in White Plains, New York.

The court-exhibit passenger table lists Epstein, Maxwell, Emmy Tayler, AP, Fleur, and additional names transcribed with varying certainty.

In some text extractions, Fleur Perry Lang appears as separate adjacent words rather than one clearly defined passenger entry.

This illustrates an important risk when using automated flight databases: an improperly parsed passenger field may create duplicate identities or inaccurate passenger counts.

The August 19 entry documents another travel overlap involving Fleur and Adam.

It does not establish where they stayed between August 16 and August 19 or whether Fleur visited Epstein’s Palm Beach residence.

December 26, 2001: St. Thomas to Saint Lucia

The third identified flight segment departed St. Thomas in the United States Virgin Islands and traveled to Vieux Fort, Saint Lucia, on December 26, 2001.

The flight record lists Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, AP, Fleur Perry Lang, and Bob Breslin.

The route is identifiable through airport codes TIST and TLPL.

St. Thomas was an important regional airport used in travel involving Epstein’s United States Virgin Islands interests.

However, departure from St. Thomas does not prove that Fleur visited Little Saint James.

Air travel to or from the region must be distinguished from independently documented transportation to a private island.

December 26, 2001: Saint Lucia to Palm Beach

A second December 26 segment traveled from Vieux Fort, Saint Lucia, to Palm Beach International Airport.

The same general passenger group is recorded, including Fleur Perry Lang.

These two December entries represent a connecting aviation itinerary.

They do not independently prove that the passengers vacationed in Saint Lucia, entered any particular property there, or participated in the same activities after landing.

Neither segment establishes Fleur’s personal relationship with every passenger aboard.

February 10, 2002: White Plains to Paris

The fifth identified flight departed Westchester County Airport in White Plains, New York, on February 10, 2002, and traveled to Paris Le Bourget Airport.

The recorded passengers include Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, AP, Fleur Perry Lang, and Mark Lloyd.

The 2020 Daily Beast investigation into Adam Perry Lang independently discusses the former chef’s extensive travel and identifies Fleur on the New York to Paris flight.

Fleur was described as Paris-born in later biographical reporting. That fact provides context but does not establish why she traveled to France on this occasion.

No authenticated onward itinerary is established in this article.

Flight Evidence and Passenger Overlaps

Fleur’s identified travel records place her name alongside several people associated with Epstein’s household, private aviation operations, and social circle.

Individual Documented overlap Evidence limitation
Jeffrey EpsteinAppears on the identified flightsDoes not explain Fleur’s purpose for travel
Adam Perry LangFormer spouse and documented employeeHis responsibilities cannot be attributed to Fleur
Ghislaine MaxwellRepeated flight overlapShared travel alone does not establish criminal knowledge
Emmy TaylerAugust 2001No separately verified personal relationship
Sarah KellenDecember 2001 and February 2002No common purpose established by manifest alone
Bob BreslinDecember 2001Crew status requires proper classification
Mark LloydFebruary 2002No independently established relationship with Fleur

Aircraft, Crew and Log Interpretation

The flights were recorded aboard aircraft N908JE, a Boeing 727 used within Epstein’s aviation network.

The aircraft should not be confused with Epstein-related aircraft bearing other registrations, including N909JE.

Aviation logs can contain passengers, pilots, other crew members, abbreviations, and handwritten remarks.

In the August 2001 records, Jonathan Mano appears in the aviation context and may be identified as a pilot in accompanying materials.

Bob Breslin similarly appears in December 2001 aviation entries.

Researchers should use original aviation records to distinguish passengers from pilots and other crew rather than treating every listed name as a social guest.

In addition, separate flight compilations may assign their own sequential entry numbers that differ from the flight numbers recorded in original aviation logs.

These differences must be preserved in the underlying evidence inventory.

Little Saint James and the Limits of Island Travel Evidence

The December 26, 2001 flights are relevant to research concerning Epstein’s Virgin Islands travel.

St. Thomas was a regional transport hub and did not function exclusively as an arrival point for Little Saint James.

A flight to or from St. Thomas does not independently establish that a passenger traveled onward to Epstein’s island.

Adam’s FBI interview describes employment involving the Virgin Islands, but it does not establish every location visited by Fleur.

Any claim that she stayed on Little Saint James requires independent corroboration.

Potential records could include boat manifests, helicopter logs, transportation invoices, property schedules, authenticated photographs, or reliable contemporaneous testimony.

No such individual island-presence record for Fleur has been authenticated in this review.

Property and Residence Research

Independent researchers have raised questions about the Perry Lang couple’s former New York residence and possible connections to a building associated with Jeffrey Epstein’s brother, Mark Epstein.

The 2019 Agenthades research thread raised potential connections involving Adam and Fleur, Manhattan property, and a possible gallery relationship.

These claims are useful as research leads, but they should not be converted into established facts without original leases, dated property records, corporate filings, or other independent evidence.

Even a verified residence in a building owned by someone in Epstein’s wider network would not independently establish criminal involvement.

Art Gallery and Professional Claims

Online discussions have also suggested that Fleur had involvement with a New York art gallery.

The evidence examined here does not independently establish the gallery’s legal identity, Fleur’s specific role, the relevant dates, or any financial relationship with Epstein.

Without supporting records, it would be misleading to describe her as Epstein’s art adviser, dealer, employee, or financial intermediary.

Such a characterization requires authenticated organizational documents or contemporaneous communications directly supporting the claimed role.

2020 FBI Investigation and Adam Perry Lang

The federal investigation generated several records concerning Adam Perry Lang’s employment and potential witness knowledge.

The August 2020 correspondence, EFTA00074704, concerns federal investigative preparations involving former Epstein chefs.

The September 2020 correspondence, EFTA01246709, records discussions with Adam’s attorney before his FBI interview.

The FBI interview report then records his description of working for Epstein, observing household activity, traveling, leaving employment, and maintaining limited later contact.

The interview provides direct context for Adam’s role in the organization.

It does not establish that Fleur was separately interviewed by the FBI, subpoenaed, charged, or investigated for misconduct.

Evidence Inventory

The following inventory separates Fleur’s flight evidence from related FBI investigative documents about Adam Perry Lang and pilot David Rodgers.

Evidence reference Document Relevance
EFTA00074704Investigative subpoena correspondenceFormer Epstein chefs
EFTA01246709Attorney correspondencePreparation for Adam’s FBI interview
EFTA01246710Adam Perry Lang FBI interview, first pageHiring and employment
EFTA01246711FBI interview continuationSupervision and household operations
EFTA01246712FBI interview continuationObservations and witness recollections
EFTA01246713FBI interview continuationDeparture and reference to his wife
EFTA01246714FBI interview final pageLater contacts with Epstein
EFTA00159180David Rodgers FBI interviewMeaning of AP and aviation context

The five pages beginning at EFTA01246710 form one FBI FD-302 interview report.

The Rodgers report beginning EFTA00159180 is a separate, longer FBI interview.

Fleur’s five flight segments are documented through the historical aviation materials. These FBI records supply contextual evidence but should not be described as five separate interviews or five separate statements by Fleur.

Document Counts, Flight Counts and Duplicates

Public Epstein research databases use different methods to count appearances.

One database may report five flight segments. Another may display six documents or multiple matching text fragments.

These measurements describe different units and cannot be compared directly.

A single document can contain more than one flight entry. The same original log can also appear in a court exhibit, DOJ release, indexed transcription, or independent archival copy.

Repeated publication does not create a new event.

Accordingly, evidence inventories should distinguish unique flights, unique source documents, duplicates, and indirect contextual references.

What Is Established by the Evidence?

The record supports several specific findings.

Fleur Perry Lang is publicly identified as the former wife of Adam Perry Lang.

Historical flight-log evidence records her name on five segments involving Epstein’s Boeing 727 between August 2001 and February 2002.

Her name appears on routes involving Albuquerque, Palm Beach, White Plains, St. Thomas, Saint Lucia, and Paris.

Adam Perry Lang separately confirmed his employment by Epstein during approximately 1998 to 2002 in a federal investigative interview.

Pilot David Rodgers clarified that the initials AP in the relevant aviation records referred to Adam Perry.

These records provide substantial contextual information about Fleur’s historical travel and her husband’s documented employment.

What Has Not Been Established?

The available evidence does not establish that Fleur Perry Lang worked for Epstein, recruited victims, managed financial transactions, or knowingly facilitated sexual abuse or trafficking.

It does not establish that she personally visited Zorro Ranch simply because a recorded flight departed Albuquerque.

It does not independently establish that she visited Little Saint James merely because an aircraft departed St. Thomas.

It does not establish the purpose of the Saint Lucia stop or Paris journey.

It also does not establish that she witnessed the same events described by Adam Perry Lang in his later FBI interview.

None of these circumstances may be inferred solely from marital relationships, passenger overlaps, airport locations, or unverified online claims.

Outstanding Research Questions

Several questions remain open in the public record reviewed for this profile.

The complete set of aviation records should be searched for Fleur’s name, abbreviated references, and verified spelling variations.

The historical flight-log images should be reconciled with court transcriptions and EFTA document productions.

Additional evidence would be needed to establish her specific purpose for travel, any verified property visits, possible professional relationships, and whether additional independent correspondence involving her exists.

Claims about a gallery or Manhattan residence require original business and property documents before inclusion as established facts.

These research questions are not themselves evidence of wrongdoing.

Watch Our Sleuths Investigate

The independent Agenthades investigation identified possible property and art-world research leads concerning Adam and Fleur Perry Lang.

Its claims require individual verification before being treated as established evidence.

No exact YouTube recording by an established EpsteinWiki contributor specifically investigating Fleur Perry Lang was independently authenticated for this article.

No unrelated video or generic search result is substituted for an original, topic-specific investigation.

Investigative Findings

Fleur Perry Lang’s place in the Epstein documentary record rests principally on five historical flight-log segments and her independently documented relationship to Adam Perry Lang.

The FBI interview with Adam provides significant context about his employment and includes a reference to his wife during the period surrounding his departure from Epstein’s household.

The Rodgers interview helps resolve historical ambiguity concerning the initials AP in the flight logs.

These materials provide a stronger evidentiary foundation than passenger lists alone.

They do not establish that Fleur participated in Epstein’s crimes or had the same knowledge as her husband.

Conclusion

Fleur Perry Lang appears by name or identifiable name variation in five flight segments associated with Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 between August 2001 and February 2002.

Her former marriage to Adam Perry Lang, Epstein’s chef during approximately 1998 to 2002, is independently documented through public reporting.

Federal investigators subsequently interviewed Adam about his work, travel, observations, and departure from Epstein’s employment. Pilot David Rodgers separately clarified the use of Adam’s initials in aviation records.

The resulting evidence establishes recorded travel and a family connection to an employee within Epstein’s household operation.

It does not establish that Fleur was an Epstein employee, participated in criminal activities, or knowingly facilitated abuse.

EpsteinWiki preserves these distinctions to maintain a factual historical record, protect against unsupported accusations, and provide researchers with a foundation for further verification.

Sources and Research References

The Giuffre v. Maxwell Document 153-2 flight compilation contains historical flight entries, including the August 2001 appearances of Fleur.

The FBI interview of Adam Perry Lang provides five pages documenting his employment, observations, and departure.

The FBI interview of David Rodgers supplies the pilot’s clarification of the initials AP and important aviation history.

The August 2020 investigative correspondence addresses investigative steps involving former Epstein chefs.

The September 2020 attorney correspondence supplies context for Adam’s forthcoming interview.

The Daily Beast investigation into Adam Perry Lang reports on his cooperation and discusses flight records involving Fleur.

The Los Angeles Times family profile provides independent biographical information about Fleur and Adam.

The Los Angeles Times photographic coverage provides attributed family photographs identifying Fleur.

The Agenthades independent research thread documents additional property and gallery leads that require primary-source corroboration.

The Epstein Data research environment provides evidence discovery and document comparison tools.

The Epstein Data document corpus provides searchable document records subject to OCR and coverage limitations.

All identifiable primary EFTA records discussed in this article are linked directly in the relevant investigative sections.

Previous Eric Gany: The Accountant Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Financial Operation
Next Ghislaine Maxwell: Sexual Abuse Allegations and the International Evidence Record
Table of Contents