Skip to main content
< All Topics
Print

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026631: Jeffrey Epstein’s 2016 “Contacts” Email

On October 30, 2016, Jeffrey Epstein sent himself an email titled “contacts.” The one page House Oversight record, HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026631, contains names and shorthand spanning science, politics, law, entertainment, and international contacts. Near the end, it changes into apparent personal reminders. A DOJ copy at EFTA00813112 shows the earlier message forwarded to Epstein’s account on November 1. Neither copy explains why each entry was written or whether a person on the list was contacted. media-cdn.rollcall.com

Snapshot

FieldWhat the records show
Main evidence IDHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026631
DOJ counterpartEFTA00813112 and EFTA00813113, a two page forwarded copy
Original message date shownOctober 30, 2016, 4:40:14 p.m. on the House rendering
DOJ forward date shownNovember 1, 2016
Subject“contacts”
Sender and recipientEpstein’s account to Epstein’s account
FormatNames, partial names, abbreviations, and apparent personal notes
Related recordsHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029622, a separate June 2019 email; EFTA01624023, a separate photographed handwritten page
Core limitA name on this email does not establish a conversation, meeting, trip, agreement, or wrongdoing.

Important Points and Key Takeaways

  • Epstein sent the October 30 message to himself. The released page does not show delivery of the list to any of the named people.
  • The body mixes apparent names with uncertain strings and, later, apparent health and property reminders. “Contacts” is the subject, but the contents are broader than a conventional address book.
  • The DOJ copy shows a November 1 forward of the earlier message. It is another preserved appearance of the underlying list, with a different email wrapper and some text extraction differences.
  • A 2019 email titled “list for bannon steve” repeats many names but adds others and changes their order. The two emails are distinct documents.
  • The list includes “mandelbrot.” If that means mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot, who died in 2010, the 2016 email cannot be treated as a list consisting only of living people available to contact.

What the Two Released Copies Show

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026631 displays the October 30 message, its “contacts” subject, an “Importance: High” line, and a one page body. Epstein’s account appears as both sender and recipient. The body has inconsistent commas, spaces, and spelling. It gives no key for interpreting the entries.

EFTA00813112 begins a two page DOJ copy. Its outer message is titled “Fwd: contacts,” dated November 1, 2016. Within it is the October 30 email. The forwarded rendering includes a trailing “rothschild” after the difficult “loen terjge” sequence that is absent from the House page’s extracted text. Researchers should check the page images before quoting an uncertain string as an exact transcription. EFTA00813113 is the continuation page, largely occupied by the footer.

Neither rendering tells us whether Epstein composed the list in one sitting, copied an older note, or intended it for someone else. “Importance: High” is an email header value. It does not identify any particular name as urgent.


Working Index of Names and Fragments

This chart reorganizes the email for searching. The original is a running sequence, not a set of labeled categories. A short string is not a verified full identity. Apparent spelling errors remain close to their printed form, and adjacent words may represent separate entries.

Working groupEntries or fragments in the emailHow to read them
Science and technologyEdelman; Set; Martin; Tata; Susskind; Strominger; Rynolds; Kosslyn; Krause; Gardner; Bill; Thiel; Hoffman; Sinofsky; Nathan; Feigenbaum; Ramachandrain; Demsaio; Christakis; Dennet; Sheldrake; Fewick; Gellman; West; Kaufman; Seligman; Kurzweill; Ben Goertzel; Gould; Saks; Mandelbrot; HopkinsSeveral adjacent names lack punctuation. “Set” could be “Seth,” and “Martin” could be Martin Nowak, but those full names are not written here. “Nathan Feigenbaum” may be two people rather than one full name.
Public and political namesMitchell; Kerry; Clinton; Richardosn; Mapp; Leahy; Spitzer; Shcumer; Pruseven; Waheed; Mandelson; Ehud; Lang; Churkin; Sergey; Jagland; Andrew; Woody; Blaine; Boris; Larry Summers; Pastrana; Cas GtroSome are only given names or misspelled surnames. “Cas Gtro” is unresolved. This group also includes apparent entertainment names.
Legal and advisory runDersh; Reummler; Marty; Roy; Ken; Jay; Lilly; Jack; Rhinehart; Chet; Tonja; Lefcourt; Moscowitz; BradkSeveral match short forms of Epstein’s lawyers. Others remain unidentified. “Bradk” appears near the end of the email, rather than in the middle of this run.
International names and short formsHamad; Jabor; Karim; Outarra; Mohmaaed; Raafat; Sultan; Loen; Terjge; Rothschild in the DOJ forwarded renderingSpellings and word breaks are uncertain. The House copy’s extracted text does not show the final word after “terjge.”
Other initials and remindersAK; Chad; Pinto; Isj or lsj; Bbj; Ana; BriceThese might refer to people, places, or Epstein’s own shorthand. The letters around “lsj” are especially vulnerable to machine reading errors.
Apparent personal notesSmell; mental fit; lipid; Crestor; Dick; prostatitis; back protein; diet; exerciseThese are cautious readings of garbled phrases, not a diagnosis or a reliable medical history.

The index leaves “Saks,” “Fewick,” “Rhinehart,” “Chet,” “Tonja,” and other short entries unresolved. Matching a surname to someone Epstein knew would create false certainty without another record. The original email controls for exact order and spelling. media-cdn.rollcall.com


The Legal Run and the Stronger Identifications

The 2016 email puts “dersh,” “reummler,” “marty,” “roy,” “ken,” “jay,” “lilly,” and “jack” in a tight sequence, followed by more short names and “lefcourt.” A December 2007 letter preserved at EFTA00213048 identifies Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, Lilly Ann Sanchez, Roy Black, Jack Goldberger, and Gerald Lefcourt among Epstein’s lawyers. Martin Weinberg is also documented as Epstein counsel in other records. The grouping supports the likely identities below; the 2007 letter independently establishes the attorneys’ roles. media-cdn.rollcall.com

Email entryLikely identityLimit
DershAlan DershowitzStrong shorthand match in a legal run.
ReummlerKathryn “Kathy” RuemmlerStrong surname match. This does not place her on the 2007 defense team.
MartyMartin WeinbergPlausible given his legal role; “Marty” alone is not unique.
RoyRoy BlackStrong contextual match.
KenKenneth StarrStrong contextual match.
JayJay LefkowitzStrong contextual match.
LillyLilly Ann SanchezStrong contextual match.
JackJack GoldbergerStrong contextual match.
LefcourtGerald LefcourtStrong surname and legal context match.
BradkPossibly Brad KarpPlausible, but abbreviated and written elsewhere in the message.

“Rhinehart,” “Chet,” “Tonja,” and “Moscowitz” need individual research. Being near lawyers on this list does not establish that each was an attorney or represented Epstein.


A Name From an Earlier Era

The email includes “mandelbrot” among science names. Yale’s memorial to Benoit Mandelbrot records that the mathematician died in October 2010, six years before the email. He is a compelling identification for that distinctive surname in this context, although the email gives no first name. Yale News

If that identification is correct, the list includes someone who could not have been a living contact in 2016. It might preserve an older network, notable names, or copied material. The document does not establish which explanation is right.


How It Relates to the 2019 Bannon Titled List

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029622 is a separate June 30, 2019 email from Epstein’s account to his own account titled “list for bannon steve.” It overlaps with the 2016 list on Susskind, Hoffman, Sinofsky, Sheldrake, Seligman, Saks, Mandelbrot, Mitchell, Churkin, Jagland, Ruemmler, and “dersh,” among others. It also contains new entries and different spellings and groupings. media-cdn.rollcall.com

The 2019 subject supplies context for that later email. The 2016 email does not mention Bannon. Neither released page proves that Bannon received either list or that one email was copied directly from the other.


How It Relates to the Handwritten Page

EFTA01624023 is a separate photograph of handwritten names and places on Epstein stationery. Tentative readings include some words also present in the typed emails, but shadows and small writing limit certainty. The photograph does not establish its date or who wrote on it.

The 2016 email provides candidate spellings to check against a clearer image. It is not a verified transcription of the sheet. The overlap cannot establish when the sheet was written, why it was written, or whether the typed email came from it.


What the Evidence Establishes

The House record establishes that a “contacts” email existed in Epstein’s account on October 30, 2016. The DOJ copy preserves a November 1 forward of the earlier text. Together they document Epstein’s collection of names and reminders, including a recognizable run of legal names.

They do not establish that Epstein contacted every named person in 2016, that every string denotes a distinct living person, that everyone listed knew one another, or that anyone named participated in Epstein’s crimes. A dated message, calendar entry, travel record, or testimony is needed to make a more specific claim about a particular relationship.


Questions for Sleuths

  • Is an earlier draft of the 2016 contacts list preserved elsewhere?
  • Do the original page images settle the differing “rothschild” ending in the DOJ and House renderings?
  • Which ambiguous fragments can be matched to dated correspondence without forcing a full name onto a short string?
  • Were the personal reminders composed with the names or copied into the same email from another note?
  • Is there a dated record linking the email to the handwritten page EFTA01624023?

Sources

Previous HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026431: Edmond de Rothschild Infrastructure Email Chain
Next HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029585: “JEE Email” Referencing Jeffrey Epstein and Financial Structuring Claims
Table of Contents