Skip to main content
Print

Deposition Transcript Index

This page indexes deposition transcripts and closely related sworn, transcribed testimony connected to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, survivor litigation, institutional-accountability cases, and congressional inquiries.

Some records contain testimony about sexual abuse, trafficking, and the exploitation of minors. Survivor names remain protected where the public record uses a pseudonym, initials, or a redaction. The appearance of any person in a deposition, exhibit, contact book, flight record, or question from counsel does not by itself establish criminal conduct, knowledge of abuse, or participation in Epstein’s crimes.

This is a routing index, not a summary of every allegation in every transcript. Each entry distinguishes between a transcript known to have existed, a full public transcript, a public excerpt, a duplicate filing, and material that remains sealed, redacted, or not confidently matched to a public file.


Snapshot

FieldRecord
Primary civil-discovery inventoriesFlorida and related Epstein-case transcript inventory, EFTA00090979 and Giuffre v. Maxwell discovery inventory, EFTA00090983
Principal civil caseVirginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 1:15-cv-07433, S.D.N.Y.
Other major civil recordsFlorida survivor suits, Epstein v. Rothstein, and the 2022 to 2023 financial-institution litigation
Congressional recordsEpstein Data congressional deposition and transcribed-interview viewer
Coverage statusVerified through September 9, 2026
Index ruleA discovery inventory proves that a transcript was held or produced. It does not prove that the full transcript is publicly accessible.

How to Read This Index

The same deposition may appear in multiple court filings, exhibit packets, government productions, and later unsealing releases. A short EFTA file may contain only selected pages even when its title page describes a much longer transcript.

StatusMeaning
Full public transcriptThe available file appears to contain the complete reported session, subject to lawful redactions and any errata
Combined public transcript setOne file contains more than one session, continuation, attachment, or related transcript component
Public excerptOnly selected transcript pages were filed or released
Inventory-confirmedA primary inventory identifies the transcript, but this index has not confidently matched a complete public copy
Sealed or protectedThe transcript or cited pages were filed under seal, designated confidential, or withheld to protect a survivor or third party
Automated transcriptSpeech-to-text created from released audio or video and not a certified court-reporter transcript
Transcribed interviewA congressional interview transcript that the releasing body did not label a deposition

Page count alone cannot establish completeness. A filing may begin with a transcript cover page and then jump to isolated cited pages. Researchers should compare the file’s printed transcript pagination, electronic page count, errata sheet, and filing declaration before calling it complete.


Foundational Transcript Inventories

Two released records provide the strongest starting points for reconstructing the deposition corpus.

Florida and Related Epstein-Case Inventory

The four-page BSF response index, EFTA00090979 lists non-confidential deposition materials from earlier Epstein-related cases. It records the deponent or protected identity, session date, volume where applicable, and a production-page range beginning with GJ SUBPOENA RESPONSE.

The production-page ranges are archival locations within the subpoena response. They are not EFTA document numbers and should not be converted into guessed EFTA links.

Giuffre v. Maxwell Inventory

The Giuffre v. Maxwell discovery inventory, EFTA00090983 identifies transcripts, deposition exhibits, pleadings, orders, and party and non-party productions from No. 1:15-cv-07433. It lists deposition sessions from April 2016 through February 2017.

The same record also lists separate deposition-exhibit collections. A deposition exhibit is not the transcript itself. An exhibit may have been shown to a witness without being admitted at a later trial, and its use during questioning does not establish the truth of every statement in the exhibit.

Why the Inventories Matter

The inventories establish that a larger transcript collection existed than the subset that is easy to find as complete public PDFs. They also show why search results can be misleading: many public files are duplicate excerpts generated when lawyers attached the same transcript pages to different motions.


Jeffrey Epstein and Florida-Case Depositions, 2009 to 2010

The following sessions are identified in EFTA00090979. Unless a public transcript file is separately linked, the entry should be treated as inventory-confirmed rather than a claim that the full transcript is publicly available.

Jeffrey Epstein Sessions

DateDeponentProduction rangePublic-access status
April 30, 2009Jeffrey Epstein000002 to 000159Inventory-confirmed; related motion records state that disputes arose over unanswered deposition questions
May 7, 2009Jeffrey Epstein000160 to 000194Inventory-confirmed continuation
October 8, 2009Jeffrey Epstein000496 to 000555Inventory-confirmed; a publicly filed excerpt identifies this as a continued deposition in a Florida survivor case
February 17, 2010Jeffrey Epstein000852 to 000919Inventory-confirmed
March 8, 2010Jeffrey Epstein000920 to 001008Inventory-confirmed
April 4, 2010Jeffrey Epstein001481 to 001537Inventory-confirmed; verify the printed cover-page date before relying on the inventory’s date transcription

A separate six-page court exhibit contains selected pages from more than one Epstein deposition, including the October 8, 2009 continuation and the March 17, 2010 deposition in Epstein v. Rothstein. See EFTA00081220. This file is an excerpt compilation, not a complete transcript of either session.

The March 17, 2010 Epstein v. Rothstein transcript records numerous assertions of constitutional rights and also includes answers to some relationship questions. An invocation of the Fifth Amendment is not, by itself, proof that the witness committed the conduct embedded in a question.

Other Florida Witnesses

DateDeponentVolumeProduction rangePublic-access status
July 29, 2009Alfredo RodriguezSession 1000195 to 000262Inventory-confirmed
August 7, 2009Alfredo RodriguezSession 2000263 to 000336Inventory-confirmed
September 8, 2009Juan AlessiI000337 to 000356Inventory-confirmed
September 8, 2009Juan AlessiII000357 to 000495Public 139-page copy, EFTA00181630
November 23, 2009Michael ReiterI000556 to 000603Inventory-confirmed
November 23, 2009Michael ReiterII000604 to 000651Inventory-confirmed
February 16, 2010Janusz BanasiakSingle listed session000652 to 000851Inventory-confirmed
March 19, 2010Joseph RecareyI001009 to 001137Inventory-confirmed
March 19, 2010Joseph RecareyII001138 to 001326Inventory-confirmed
March 24, 2010Protected or unclear in public inventoryI001327 to 001373Identity and full public match not established
March 24, 2010Protected or unclear in public inventoryII and III001374 to 001442Identity and full public match not established
April 13, 2010Protected or unclear in public inventorySingle listed session001443 to 001480A 38-page public file, EFTA01246832, contains a protected-name videotaped deposition; do not infer the redacted identity

These witnesses occupied different roles. Some were household employees, some were law-enforcement witnesses, and some identities remain protected. Their testimony must be evaluated question by question and in the context of the case in which it was taken.

Additional Public Florida-Era Records

DateDeponentCase or contextPublic copyStatus
March 15, 2010Jane Doe witnessFederal civil litigation involving Epstein survivorsEFTA00182418Public transcript with protected identity; see the EpsteinWiki evidence page
March 17, 2010Jeffrey EpsteinEpstein v. Rothstein, Edwards, and L.M., Florida state courtEFTA00081220Selected filed pages only
March 23, 2010Bradley J. EdwardsEpstein v. RothsteinEFTA00728258Motion record confirms the deposition; full transcript match remains pending
June 4, 2012Scott RothsteinBankruptcy examination later filed in related litigationEpsteinWiki filing and transcript pagePublic filing set; confirm the included page span before quoting
September 21, 2009Mark EpsteinRelated civil testimonyEFTA01249325Public deposition record
Date shown in transcriptLarry MorrisonAircraft-related civil testimonyEFTA01247021Public deposition record

The EpsteinWiki Juan Alessi profile provides witness context, but the transcript itself remains the controlling source for what he said under oath.


Giuffre v. Maxwell Depositions, 2016 to 2017

Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell was a civil defamation action in the Southern District of New York. The case produced a large discovery record, including testimony from the parties, family members, employees, pilots, law-enforcement witnesses, and experts.

The table below follows the order of the BSF discovery inventory, EFTA00090983. Names withheld or unreadable in the public inventory remain protected here.

Party and Fact-Witness Sessions

DateDeponentPublic transcript linkAvailability note
April 22, 2016Ghislaine MaxwellEFTA02795364465-page public transcript copy of the April session
May 3, 2016Virginia GiuffreEFTA0279270589-page public transcript copy; duplicate copies also appear in later filings
May 18, 2016Protected deponentInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed; identity should not be reconstructed from context
May 20, 2016Sky RobertsInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed; complete public copy not confidently matched
May 24, 2016Lynn Trude MillerInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed; complete public copy not confidently matched
May 26, 2016Dr. Steven OlsonInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed; complete public copy not confidently matched
June 1, 2016Juan AlessiInventory, EFTA00090983Transcript existed; public filings located during verification chiefly contained excerpts or declarations describing sealed excerpts
June 3, 2016David RodgersEFTA02793946Seven-page public excerpt, not a verified complete session
June 10, 2016Rinaldo RizzoEFTA02792530Six-page public excerpt; multiple duplicate excerpt filings exist
June 20, 2016Protected deponentInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed; identity should not be guessed
June 21, 2016Joseph RecareyEFTA02787180Nine-page public excerpt, not a verified complete session
June 23, 2016James AustrichInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed; complete public copy not confidently matched
June 24, 2016Tony Figueroa, Volume IEFTA02784905Forty-page filed portion of a transcript whose printed pagination identifies a 157-page first volume
June 24, 2016Tony Figueroa, Volume IIInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed; printed pagination in related releases identifies pages 158 to 258
July 22, 2016Ghislaine Maxwell, continuedEFTA0279582973-page public copy of the continued session; EFTA00083933 is a shorter filed excerpt
September 8, 2016Brittany HendersonInventory, EFTA00090983Listed in the exhibit inventory; complete public transcript not confidently matched
September 9, 2016Jeffrey EpsteinInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed; do not characterize the substance without a verified transcript page
November 14, 2016Protected deponentInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed; identity remains protected in the public index
November 18, 2016Ross GowInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed; complete public copy not confidently matched
January 17, 2017Protected deponentInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed
January 25, 2017Protected deponentInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed
February 17, 2017Protected deponentInventory, EFTA00090983Inventory-confirmed

The EpsteinWiki Giuffre deposition overview and Exhibit 10 evidence page provide narrower routing for specific released excerpts.

Expert Depositions Listed in the Discovery Inventory

DateDeponentInventory note
November 9, 2016Bernard JansenTranscript and errata sheet listed
November 17, 2016Gilbert KlimanTranscript and errata sheet listed
November 21, 2016Terry CoonanTranscript and errata sheet listed
November 22, 2016Chris AndersonTranscript and errata sheet listed
November 29, 2016Peter KentTranscript listed
November 30, 2016Frederick MillerTranscript listed
December 1, 2016Phillip EsplinTranscript listed
December 2, 2016Gregory TaylorTranscript listed

All eight entries are supported by EFTA00090983, pages 2 to 3. The inventory separately lists their deposition exhibits in EFTA00090985. A transcript, an errata sheet, and an exhibit packet should be cataloged as distinct records.


Maxwell Deposition Unsealing and Duplicate Control

Maxwell’s April 22 and July 22, 2016 depositions became central to later unsealing litigation and to arguments in her criminal case. Public files now include full-session copies and many smaller duplicate excerpts.

RecordWhat it providesLimitation
EFTA02795364465-page public copy of the April 22, 2016 Maxwell depositionCheck the printed pagination and any errata before quoting
EFTA0279582973-page public copy of the July 22, 2016 continued Maxwell depositionAutomated document classification may label the file as a hearing, but its cover text identifies a continued videotaped deposition
EFTA02788567Public Maxwell deposition copy beginning April 22, 2016Compare printed pagination and redactions with the 465-page April copy before treating it as a separate session
EFTA00083933Short excerpt from the July 22, 2016 continued depositionNot the complete continuation
EFTA00008716Scan-derived Maxwell deposition pagesImage and OCR quality vary; use printed page numbers
EFTA00008892Additional scan-derived Maxwell deposition pagesMay duplicate pages found elsewhere

The safest citation form is: deponent, deposition date, printed transcript page and line, case name and number, followed by the EFTA file containing that page. Citing only an electronic PDF page can produce an incorrect reference when the same excerpt is repackaged in another filing.

Deposition testimony is sworn evidence, but it is not automatically an adjudicated finding. Questions from counsel are not evidence. Objections are not findings. A witness’s answer may be disputed, corrected through an errata sheet, contradicted by another witness, or limited by later judicial rulings.


Financial-Institution Litigation Depositions, 2023

The litigation involving the Government of the United States Virgin Islands, JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and survivor plaintiffs generated another large deposition record. Much of the material was designated confidential during discovery, and the public docket often contains selected excerpts rather than complete transcripts.

DateDeponentCase contextPublic recordAvailability note
May 26, 2023James DimonGovernment of the U.S. Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:22-cv-10904EFTA02817703Nine-page filed excerpt; other EFTA files contain overlapping excerpts, some with Bank Secrecy Act portions under separate cover
June 10, 2023James Edward “Jes” StaleyJPMorgan and related third-party litigationDeclaration identifying sealed excerpts, EFTA02818619The linked filing confirms excerpt use; it is not a complete transcript
July 7, 2023Bridgette CarrFinancial-institution litigationFiling identifying sealed deposition excerpts, EFTA02813116The declaration confirms the transcript and sealed excerpts; full public access is not established

These cases involved allegations and defenses concerning bank compliance, account oversight, suspicious activity, institutional knowledge, and the handling of Epstein as a client. The existence of a deposition or the fact that a witness held a senior position does not establish personal knowledge or liability. Findings should be attributed to the court, admissions to the witness, allegations to the pleading party, and denials to the person or institution that made them.

See Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for case-level context.


Congressional Depositions and Transcribed Interviews, 2025 to 2026

Congressional records require a separate classification. The House Oversight Committee released some proceedings as depositions and others as transcribed interviews. Epstein Data also created automated transcripts for released deposition videos. An automated speech-to-text transcript is a research aid, not a certified stenographic record.

Released Deposition Videos or Formal Deposition Transcripts

DateWitnessRecord typeEpstein Data accessVerification note
September 16, 2025William BarrSubpoenaed deposition; official redacted written transcriptSearchable transcript130-page official transcript indexed by page
February 9, 2026Ghislaine MaxwellRecorded congressional deposition-style sessionEpsteinWiki video and transcript evidence pagePublic video with reviewed platform captions; not listed in the current Epstein Data synchronized-deposition viewer
February 18, 2026Les WexnerHouse Oversight deposition videoSynchronized video transcriptApproximately 4 hours 55 minutes; automated speaker identification
February 26, 2026Hillary ClintonHouse Oversight deposition videoSynchronized video transcriptApproximately 4 hours 35 minutes; automated transcript
February 27, 2026Bill ClintonHouse Oversight deposition videoSynchronized video transcriptApproximately 4 hours 33 minutes; automated transcript
March 11, 2026Richard KahnHouse Oversight deposition videoSynchronized video transcriptApproximately 5 hours 53 minutes; automated transcript
March 19, 2026Darren IndykeHouse Oversight deposition videoSynchronized video transcriptApproximately 6 hours 45 minutes; automated transcript

Official House Transcribed Interviews

DateWitnessStatusEpstein Data access
April 30, 2026Ted WaittVoluntary transcribed interview; official redacted PDFSearchable transcript
May 6, 2026Howard LutnickVoluntary transcribed interview; official redacted PDFSearchable transcript
May 18, 2026Tova NoelVoluntary transcribed interview; official redacted PDFSearchable transcript
May 21, 2026Sarah KellenVoluntary transcribed interview; official scanned transcriptSearchable OCR transcript
May 29, 2026Pam BondiSubpoenaed transcribed interview; official redacted PDFSearchable transcript
June 9, 2026Lesley GroffVoluntary transcribed interview; official redacted PDFSearchable transcript
June 10, 2026Bill GatesVoluntary transcribed interview; official redacted PDFSearchable transcript
June 26, 2026Leon BlackSubpoenaed transcribed interview; official redacted PDFSearchable transcript
June 30, 2026Doug BandVoluntary transcribed interview; official redacted PDFSearchable transcript
July 15, 2026Kathryn RuemmlerVoluntary transcribed interview; official redacted PDFSearchable transcript
July 24, 2026Jes StaleyHouse Oversight record listed as a deposition; official redacted written transcriptSearchable transcript

Congressional testimony may contain witness recollection, denials, attorney instructions, documentary references, committee assertions, and partisan questioning. Each category must be attributed accurately. A committee member’s question is not a factual finding, and an exhibit marked during testimony is not automatically proof of the proposition suggested by the question.


Chronology

PeriodDevelopment
2009 to 2010Florida survivor suits and related litigation produced repeated depositions of Epstein, household employees, law-enforcement witnesses, and other participants
2012The Scott Rothstein examination entered the related public record through later filing and notice practice
2015Giuffre filed her defamation action against Maxwell in the Southern District of New York
2016 to 2017Party, fact-witness, and expert depositions were taken in Giuffre v. Maxwell
2019A BSF ShareFile inventory was produced in response to a federal grand-jury subpoena, preserving a map of earlier transcript holdings
2019 to 2020News organizations litigated access to sealed Giuffre v. Maxwell materials; transcript pages were released in stages
2021Maxwell’s criminal prosecution cited or litigated portions of the civil deposition record, including potential perjury issues, while the jury verdict rested on evidence admitted in the criminal trial
2022 to 2023Survivor and Virgin Islands litigation against financial institutions produced senior-executive, compliance, expert, and third-party depositions, many publicly available only as excerpts
2025 to 2026The House Oversight Committee conducted depositions and transcribed interviews and released written transcripts or video records for a growing witness set

What the Deposition Record Establishes

Taken as a record set, the deposition corpus establishes that:

  • Epstein and Maxwell-related civil cases generated extensive sworn discovery across multiple jurisdictions and more than one decade.
  • Lawyers questioned parties, survivors, employees, pilots, investigators, experts, bankers, executives, and other witnesses under oath.
  • The April and July 2016 Maxwell sessions, the May 2016 Giuffre session, and multiple Florida-era depositions are documented through transcript copies, court filings, or primary inventories.
  • The 2019 subpoena-response inventories show that government investigators received structured collections containing transcripts and deposition exhibits.
  • Later bank litigation and congressional inquiries expanded the sworn or formally transcribed record beyond the original survivor cases.

What the Deposition Record Does Not Establish

The record does not establish that:

  • every transcript named in an inventory is publicly available in full;
  • every EFTA file labeled as a deposition contains a complete certified transcript;
  • every statement made under oath is accurate, corroborated, or accepted by a court;
  • an allegation embedded in a lawyer’s question is evidence;
  • a witness’s inability to recall an event proves that the event did or did not happen;
  • a constitutional invocation is an admission of the conduct suggested by a question;
  • a person’s appearance in testimony, an exhibit, a photograph, a flight log, or an address book establishes wrongdoing;
  • civil deposition material was admitted at Maxwell’s criminal trial or formed part of the jury’s verdict.

For trial evidence, use the Maxwell Trial Exhibits Index and Maxwell Criminal Trial: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.


Questions Still Unanswered

  • Which inventory-confirmed Florida transcripts have complete, non-duplicative public EFTA copies, and which survive only as excerpts?
  • Do the public Maxwell transcript copies contain every page from their respective 2016 sessions, all errata, and every court-ordered redaction?
  • Which protected deponents in the Giuffre v. Maxwell inventory can lawfully be identified from unsealed court records, and which identities remain protected?
  • Are the full Sky Roberts, Lynn Trude Miller, Dr. Steven Olson, James Austrich, Brittany Henderson, and Ross Gow transcripts publicly accessible as standalone files?
  • Which 2023 financial-institution deposition transcripts were later unsealed in full, and which public files contain only motion-selected excerpts?
  • Are certified written transcripts available for every congressional deposition released initially as video?
  • What additional deposition exhibits remain sealed, withheld, duplicated, or separated from the transcript that authenticated them?
  • Can a docket-level concordance map each deposition page to every later filing without reproducing survivor-identifying information?

Research and Citation Guide

Use the following hierarchy when citing a deposition:

  1. Certified transcript page and line, with the deponent and date.
  2. Case name, court, case number, and filing or exhibit number where available.
  3. EFTA number for the released file containing the cited page.
  4. Errata sheet or correction notice, if one exists.
  5. Judicial ruling if the testimony’s admissibility, confidentiality, or meaning was disputed.

When a public file is only an excerpt, say so. When a name is redacted, preserve the redaction. When duplicate EFTA files contain the same transcript pages, select one stable copy and record the duplicates in the evidence page rather than presenting them as different depositions.

OCR should be checked against the page image. Common errors include incorrect names, missing punctuation, confused dates, and the substitution of “scaled” for “sealed.” Automated congressional transcripts require an additional check against the released audio or video when exact wording matters.


Related EpsteinWiki Articles


Sources

Primary and Record Sources

  1. BSF response inventory of Florida and related Epstein-case transcripts, EFTA00090979
  2. BSF ShareFile inventory for Giuffre v. Maxwell, EFTA00090983
  3. Expert deposition-exhibit inventory, EFTA00090985
  4. Maxwell April 22, 2016 deposition transcript, EFTA02795364
  5. Maxwell July 22, 2016 continued deposition transcript, EFTA02795829
  6. Additional Maxwell deposition copy, EFTA02788567
  7. Giuffre May 3, 2016 deposition copy, EFTA02792705
  8. Juan Alessi September 8, 2009 Volume II deposition, EFTA00181630
  9. Florida deposition excerpt compilation, EFTA00081220
  10. James Dimon deposition excerpts, EFTA02817703
  11. Declaration identifying James Staley deposition excerpts, EFTA02818619
  12. Declaration identifying Bridgette Carr deposition excerpts, EFTA02813116
  13. House Oversight congressional deposition and transcribed-interview access page

Verification Note

Epstein Data is an independent index of the DOJ production and related public records. Its EFTA links route to released files, but its automated classifications, OCR, speaker identification, and analytical labels are not government findings. Every substantive claim should be checked against the linked document image, certified transcript, official video, court docket, or committee release.

Previous Darren Indyke Deposition: House Oversight Epstein Investigation (2026)
Next Doug Band’s Congressional Testimony Reveals New Details About Clinton, Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell
Table of Contents