Skip to main content
< All Topics
Print

Jeffrey Epstein Litigation Index: Lawsuits Involving Epstein, His Companies, Trusts, and Estate

Jeffrey Epstein’s litigation history extends far beyond his criminal prosecutions and lawsuits seeking government records. He, his estate, his trusts, and Epstein controlled companies appeared in survivor actions, banking and investment disputes, property and construction cases, corporate litigation, attorney fee disputes, probate proceedings, and litigation involving aircraft, boats, homes, a ranch, and private islands.

This EpsteinWiki article is a working public record inventory as of August 15, 2026. It includes every proceeding located and individually verified so far in which Jeffrey Edward Epstein, his estate, the executors acting for the estate, one of his trusts, or an identified Epstein controlled entity was a named party or formal participant. It excludes cases whose principal object was obtaining, unsealing, or publishing the “Epstein files.” Related cases that contain evidence but do not include an Epstein party are separated from the direct party list.

No open source list can honestly guarantee that a sealed, confidential, destroyed, misindexed, foreign, or never digitized matter does not exist. Accordingly, this article distinguishes verified dockets from documented cases whose docket numbers remain unavailable. It also treats removal, remand, appeal, and corrective electronic docket numbers as stages of a case lineage rather than inflating the total.


Verification key

GradeMeaning
AOfficial court page, government filing, or published judicial opinion
BPublic docket mirror or archived court document
CProceeding documented, but complete docket or docket number not located
DDuplicate, corrective shell, same name false positive, or excluded records case

Snapshot and method

Verified direct party litigation has been located in New York, Florida, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Pennsylvania, Colorado, California, Georgia, New Mexico, and Minnesota. No verified French lawsuit naming Epstein, his estate, or an Epstein controlled French company as a party was located.

Principal audit baselines were the Justice Department court record collection, Virgin Islands probate docket, the Estate’s 2020 quarterly accounting and litigation schedule, EFTA00082467, and a court filed survivor case list. None is complete by itself.

Included are proceedings involving Epstein as a plaintiff, defendant, petitioner, intervenor, criminal defendant, or formal participant. The inventory also includes the Estate, the 1953 Trust, executors acting in representative capacities, and Epstein controlled entities named as parties. Located appeals, removals, remands, and probate review identifiers are included as stages of their respective case lineages.

Excluded from the direct count are confidential compensation program claims that did not become lawsuits, cases merely mentioning Epstein, records and unsealing cases, unrelated same name parties, and abandoned electronic filing shells.


Commercial and other direct civil litigation outside the survivor and estate clusters

FiledCase and courtDocket or citationEpstein role, subject, and resultGrade
1975New York University v. Jeffrey E. Epstein, New York County Civil Court13994; EFTA01700845A background investigation states that NYU filed a $500 lawsuit against Epstein on January 28, 1975. The original complaint and disposition have not been locatedC
1988Pennwalt Corp. v. Centaur Partners and Trio Acquisition Corp. v. Pennwalt Corp., E.D. Pa.88-5146 and 88-9422; 710 F. Supp. 111The opinion identifies Epstein as one of the separately represented investors in the consolidated takeover litigationA
Before 1992Epstein v. Herbert Glass, Palm Beach CountyDocket not locatedReported $13,444 furnishings claim after Glass sold Epstein the Palm Beach houseC
1992Stroll v. Epstein, S.D.N.Y. and Second Circuit1:92-cv-01021; 9 F.3d 1537Contract and investment dispute involving Intercontinental Asset Group; summary judgment for Epstein affirmedB
Circa 1995Municipal Art Society rent dispute, New YorkDocket not locatedContemporary reporting says the dispute with Epstein settledC
1995Pierce Segerberg P.C. et al. v. Epstein, D. Colo.1:95-cv-01109Contract action filed May 11 and terminated December 11, 1995B
1996United States v. Epstein and Fisher, S.D.N.Y.1:96-cv-08307Possession and rent for a former Iranian diplomatic residence allegedly sublet to Epstein without authorizationA
1997Epstein v. Fisher, S.D.N.Y.1:97-cv-01489Related landlord, tenant, indemnity, and ejectment litigationB
Date not locatedDickerson & Reily fee disputeDocket not locatedReported settled fee matter arising from work involving Leslie Wexner’s yacht LimitlessC
2002Financial Trust Co., Inc. and Epstein v. Citibank, N.A., D.V.I.3:02-cv-00108 / 2002-108Two $10 million investments tied to AIG and MassMutualA
2002Citibank, N.A. v. Epstein et al., S.D.N.Y.1:02-cv-05332Citibank sought payment on related promissory notes; part of the same banking dispute as D.V.I. 2002-108B
2002Shanks v. Wexner et al., E.D. Pa.2:02-cv-07671Portrait commission contract dispute naming Leslie and Abigail Wexner, Ghislaine Maxwell, and EpsteinB
2005Williamson v. Jeffrey E. Epstein, as Trustee of Institutional Interests, New York Supreme Court and First DepartmentTrial index not located; item 9264; 41 A.D.3d 229; leave denied, 10 N.Y.3d 702Lipper Convertibles recovery action; dismissed as time barredA
2005Carver Cross Securities Corp. v. Radar Media LLC et al., New York County601865/2005; 2006 NY Slip Op 30256(U)Epstein was a defendant in contract, fraud, and transfer litigation; the conspiracy to commit fraud claim against him was dismissedA
2007Cordero v. Epstein, New York County113903/2007Sexual abuse and modeling related claims; dismissed as untimelyA
2009Financial Trust Company, Inc. v. The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., D.V.I. and S.D.N.Y.D.V.I. 3:09-cv-00106 / 2009-106 → S.D.N.Y. 1:10-cv-01226 → consolidated into 1:08-cv-02793, MDL 1963Epstein controlled Financial Trust sued for fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation over losses on 120,000 Bear Stearns shares. The verified complaint identifies Epstein as Financial Trust’s president, director, sole shareholder, and investment decision maker. Complaint evidence spans EFTA00722107 through EFTA00722125. A 2011 settlement agreement, EFTA00597963, records the transfer and consolidation and resolves this action together with FINRA 09-00979 for a combined $9.2 million, without admission of liability, followed by dismissal with prejudice. Search the complaint evidence on Epstein DataA
2016Hoffenberg v. Epstein, S.D.N.Y.1:16-cv-03989Steven Hoffenberg sued over Epstein’s alleged role in Towers Financial related conductB
2018Gerber and Koenig v. Financial Trust Co. and Epstein, S.D.N.Y.1:18-cv-07580Proposed Towers Financial noteholder and bondholder class action alleging conspiracy and financial misconductB

Florida survivor civil cases from 2008 through 2010

These 18 verified federal dockets named Epstein. A state origin, federal removal, remand, and appeal are stages of one lineage, not separate lawsuits.

FiledCaseS.D. Fla. docketNotesGrade
2008Doe et al. v. Epstein9:08-cv-80069Early survivor actionB
2008Doe v. Epstein9:08-cv-80119Coordinating docket; Epstein Data document EFTA00222670B
2008Doe No. 3 v. Epstein9:08-cv-80232Survivor actionB
2008Doe No. 4 v. Epstein9:08-cv-80380Survivor actionB
2008Doe No. 5 v. Epstein9:08-cv-80381Privilege and discovery rulingsB
2008Doe v. Epstein et al.9:08-cv-80804Removed from Palm Beach case 50-2008-CA-006596 and later remandedA
2008C.M.A. v. Epstein et al.9:08-cv-80811Also named Sarah KellenB
2008Doe v. Epstein9:08-cv-80893Survivor actionB
2008Jane Doe No. 7 v. Epstein9:08-cv-80993Survivor actionA
2008Jane Doe No. 6 v. Epstein9:08-cv-80994Survivor actionB
2009Doe II v. Epstein9:09-cv-80469Also named Sarah KellenB
2009Doe No. 101 v. Epstein9:09-cv-80591Survivor actionB
2009Doe No. 102 v. Epstein9:09-cv-80656Virginia Giuffre under a pseudonymB
2009Doe No. 8 v. Epstein9:09-cv-80802Survivor actionB
2009L.M. v. Epstein9:09-cv-81092Survivor action; the docket mirror URL misspells EpsteinB
2010Doe No. 103 v. Epstein9:10-cv-80309Survivor actionA
2010C.L. v. Epstein9:10-cv-80447Survivor actionB
2010M.J. v. Epstein and Sarah Kellen9:10-cv-81111Substantive September 17, 2010 complaintB

S.D. Fla. 9:10-cv-81107, 9:10-cv-81108, 9:10-cv-81109, and 9:10-cv-81110 were abandoned or corrective electronic entries preceding 9:10-cv-81111. They were not four additional lawsuits.


Other Florida civil litigation

FiledCaseDocketRole, subject, and lineageGrade
2008Doe v. United StatesS.D. Fla. 9:08-cv-80736Crime Victims’ Rights Act challenge to the nonprosecution agreement; Epstein formally intervenedB
2009Palm Beach Marine Construction v. EpsteinS.D. Fla. 9:09-cv-80175Construction, lien, and foreclosure disputeB
2009Epstein v. Rothstein, Edwards, and L.M.Palm Beach 50-2009-CA-040800Epstein’s fraud and RICO claims were abandoned; Edwards’ counterclaim settled in 2018A
2010Podhurst Orseck, P.A. v. EpsteinS.D. Fla. 1:10-cv-21586Attorney fee and contract disputeB
2011In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.S.D. Fla. 0:11-cv-61338Epstein participated as an interested partyB
2014 through 2015Edwards v. Epstein and RothsteinFourth DCA 4D14-2282; Florida Supreme Court SC15-2286Appeals in the Edwards and Rothstein litigation lineageA
2014Brunel and MC2 v. EpsteinMiami Dade 14-21348-CA-01Business and reputational loss claimsB
2018Epstein v. BrunelThird DCA 3D18-1997; 271 So. 3d 1173Service appeal in the Brunel and MC2 litigation; later reported settledA
2019JJ Doe v. Indyke and KahnPalm Beach 50-2019-CA-016311Estate survivor action confirmed in a court filed scheduleA
2020Latham et al. v. Trump et al.S.D. Fla. 9:20-cv-82157Pro se action naming Epstein, Indyke, Kahn, and others; no merits findingsB
2021Doe v. IndykeS.D. Fla. 9:21-cv-80589Post death survivor actionB
2026Doe v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein et al.S.D. Fla. 9:26-cv-80078Estate, 1953 Trust, and Laurel named; voluntarily dismissed without prejudice on February 24, 2026B

The 2026 docket numbers 9:26-cv-80069 and 9:26-cv-80074 were administratively closed for lack of an initiating document. They are filing shells in the 9:26-cv-80078 lineage, not separate lawsuits.

The Crime Victims’ Rights Act litigation also generated Eleventh Circuit docket numbers 13-12923, 13-12926, 13-12928, 19-10036, and 19-13843, plus Supreme Court case 21-351. These are appellate stages of S.D. Fla. 9:08-cv-80736.


New York survivor and estate litigation

Predeath survivor cases

FiledCaseDocketStatusGrade
2016Katie Johnson v. Trump and Epstein, C.D. Cal.5:16-cv-00797First version; voluntarily dismissed without a merits rulingB
2016Doe v. Trump and Epstein, S.D.N.Y.1:16-cv-04642Refiled version; voluntarily dismissed without a merits rulingB
2016Doe v. Trump and Epstein, S.D.N.Y.1:16-cv-07673Later version; voluntarily dismissed without a merits rulingB
2017Jane Doe 43 v. EpsteinS.D.N.Y. 1:17-cv-00616Sarah Ransome action against Epstein, Maxwell, Kellen, Groff, and Malyshev; principal claims dismissed with prejudice following settlementA

No court adjudicated the truth of the allegations in the three 2016 Trump and Epstein complaints.

Jennifer Araoz proceedings

FiledProceedingDocketNotesGrade
2019In re Jennifer Araoz, preaction disclosure proceeding, New York County156728/2019Petition seeking evidence identifying an alleged recruiter before the Child Victims Act filing window openedA
2019Jennifer Araoz v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein et al., New York County950010/2019Damages action naming the Estate and, in amended pleadings, Maxwell, alleged facilitators, and more than 20 Epstein associated entitiesA

These were distinct proceedings arising from one claimant’s litigation history.

Federal estate and entity cases filed in 2019

CaseS.D.N.Y. docketNamed Epstein parties or key noteGrade
V.E. v. Nine East 71st Street Corp.1:19-cv-07625Nine East; premises liabilityB
Doe 1 v. Jeffrey Epstein1:19-cv-07675Began with two plaintiffs and was later amended to include additional DoesB
Katlyn Doe v. Indyke1:19-cv-07771Estate, HBRK, JEGE, NES, Florida Science Foundation, and other entitiesB
Priscilla Doe v. Indyke1:19-cv-07772Estate and corporate defendantsB
Lisa Doe v. Indyke1:19-cv-07773Estate, Financial Trust, HBRK, NES, and othersB
Jane Doe v. Indyke1:19-cv-08673Estate and entity claimsA
Doe 17 v. Indyke1:19-cv-09610Estate, Cypress, Financial Trust, JEGE, and other entitiesB
Maria Farmer v. Indyke1:19-cv-10474Corrected identification: Maria FarmerA
Annie Farmer v. Indyke1:19-cv-10475Corrected identification: Annie FarmerB
Teresa Helm v. Indyke1:19-cv-10476Estate claimsB
Juliette Bryant v. Indyke1:19-cv-10479Estate action involving international recruitment allegationsB
Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke1:19-cv-10577Estate claimsB
Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke1:19-cv-10653Estate action alleging abuse beginning when the plaintiff was 15A
Mary Doe v. Indyke1:19-cv-10758Estate claimsB
Teala Davies v. Indyke1:19-cv-10788Estate action containing allegations spanning New York, New Mexico, Florida, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and FranceB
Anastasia Doe v. Indyke1:19-cv-11869Estate claimsB

New York state multi plaintiff estate cases

FiledCaseIndexNotesGrade
December 3, 2019Jane Doe I through Jane Doe IX v. Indyke and Kahn956230/2019Nine plaintiffs; index number confirmed in an official filing in the Virgin Islands probate recordA
August 13, 2020Jane Doe X through Jane Doe XVIII v. Indyke and Kahn950613/2020A different nine plaintiff action; public complaint copyB

These two cases must not be collapsed. Their plaintiff numbering, filing dates, and index numbers are different.


Estate and entity cases filed from 2020 through 2021

FiledCaseDocketNotesGrade
2020Doe v. IndykeS.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-00484Estate and Maxwell; alleged abuse beginning at Interlochen when the plaintiff was 13; dismissed with prejudice following a compensation resolutionA
2020Doe v. IndykeS.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-02365Named a broad network of trusts, foundations, aircraft companies, property companies, and financial entitiesA
2020Kaufman et al. v. IndykeS.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-05069Multiplaintiff estate actionB
2020Latham et al. v. The 1953 Trust et al.S.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-07102Independent pro se Trust and Estate action filed August 31, 2020; dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), not on findings that its allegations were trueB
2020Doe XX v. IndykeS.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-11106Estate actionB
2020Doe XXI v. IndykeS.D.N.Y. 1:20-cv-11110Estate actionB
2021Gueye v. Jeffrey Epstein’s EstatesS.D.N.Y. 1:21-cv-00163; Second Circuit 21-879Pro se action dismissed at the fee and in forma pauperis stage; appeal dismissedB
2021Doe v. IndykeS.D.N.Y. 1:21-cv-03876Estate action; publicly available facts remain limitedB
2021Doe v. Indyke and GroffS.D.N.Y. 1:21-cv-08469Estate and Lesley Groff; alleged trafficking across New York, France, Florida, and the U.S. Virgin Islands; voluntarily dismissedB

New York litigation from 2023 through 2026

FiledCaseDocket or lineageNamed Epstein party and statusGrade
2023Elizabeth Stein v. Indyke, Kahn, Estate, and MaxwellNew York County 952299/2023Estate survivor action; reported settled in 2024 without admissionsB
2024Doe 3 v. Indyke and KahnS.D.N.Y. 1:24-cv-01204Putative adviser class action; settlement of up to $35 million preliminarily approved in March 2026, with a final hearing scheduled for September 16B
2024Jane Doe 3 v. Indyke and KahnS.D.N.Y. 1:24-cv-02192Individual estate action associated with case 1:24-cv-01204A
2024Jane Doe 200 v. Indyke and KahnS.D.N.Y. 1:24-cv-04775Estate action terminated April 22, 2025B
2026Lesniewski et al. v. Wexner et al.New York County 152920/2026; S.D.N.Y. 1:26-cv-02613Nine East named as a defendant; complaint and removal papersA
2026Doe 1 and Doe 2 v. Kahn et al.State number shown as 1582451-2026; S.D.N.Y. 1:26-cv-06142Kahn and Indyke named as executors, along with Nine East, Wexner, and the Wexner Foundation; removed July 20B

The unusual state number “1582451-2026” is reproduced exactly from the federal removal docket. It may be a typographical error in the source.


U.S. Virgin Islands litigation and estate proceedings

FiledCaseDocketSubject and statusGrade
2002Financial Trust Co. and Epstein v. CitibankD.V.I. 3:02-cv-00108 / 2002-108Banking dispute described aboveA
2009Financial Trust Company, Inc. v. The Bear Stearns Companies Inc.D.V.I. 3:09-cv-00106 / 2009-106 → S.D.N.Y. 1:10-cv-01226 → 1:08-cv-02793, MDL 1963Financial Trust’s Bear Stearns stock loss and misrepresentation action, transferred, consolidated, and settled as described aboveA
2010Molyneux v. Epstein and L.S.J., LLCD.V.I. 3:10-cv-00034Contract and construction disputeB
2010Epstein and L.S.J., LLC v. Fancelli Paneling, Inc.Virgin Islands Superior Court ST-10-CV-443Construction and cabinetry dispute; Molyneux was ordered joinedA
2018Crown Bay Marina v. Jeffrey Epstein and Michelle’s Transportation / Big N BargeD.V.I. 3:18-cv-00069Maritime contract dispute following Hurricane IrmaB
2019In re Estate of Jeffrey E. EpsteinVirgin Islands Superior Court ST-19-PB-80Probate, claims, liens, inventories, legal fees, property sales, and estate administrationA
2020Government of the V.I. v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein et al.Virgin Islands Superior Court ST-20-CV-14Named the Estate, the 1953 Trust, the executors, and numerous Epstein entities; settled in 2022 for more than $105 million plus additional reliefA
2020Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein et al.Virgin Islands Superior Court ST-20-CV-155Maxwell sought indemnification and legal expenses from the Estate, the executors, and NES; Epstein Data case evidenceA
2021In re Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, review proceedingVirgin Islands Superior Court ST-21-RV-00005Review of estate and probate rulingsA

The Virgin Islands second amended complaint is one of the most comprehensive court filed maps of Epstein entities, property transfers, tax benefit representations, corporate officers, and banking relationships.

New Mexico

FiledCaseCourt and docketStatusGrade
2019Cypress, Inc. v. New Mexico State Land OfficeNew Mexico First Judicial District; docket not locatedCypress petitioned to block cancellation of grazing leases surrounding Zorro Ranch and later withdrew its challenge. The New Mexico State Land Office confirms the administrative contest and court petitionC

The later New Mexico lawsuit seeking Justice Department records is excluded because its principal object is obtaining the “Epstein files.” A renewed criminal investigation is not a lawsuit against Epstein or Cypress.


Minnesota

The Estate’s official first quarterly accounting and Schedule G, EFTA00082467, lists a Minnesota lawsuit filed January 22, 2020 against The 1953 Trust, the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, and Mark Epstein.

The publicly released copy does not preserve a readable plaintiff name, exact court, or docket number. It is therefore a verified lawsuit reference, but its complete caption and docket remain unresolved.

This lawsuit must not be merged with the later Latham et al. v. The 1953 Trust et al. action in S.D.N.Y. without additional documentary proof connecting the two cases.


Arbitration and private adjudication

Arbitrations are formal disputes but are not court lawsuits. They are separated here so researchers can locate the evidence without inflating the lawsuit count.

FiledProceedingNumberSubject and resultGrade
2009Financial Trust Company, Inc. and The C.O.U.Q. Foundation, Inc. v. The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., Bear Stearns Asset Management Inc., and Warren SpectorFINRA 09-00979, EFTA00726318Claims involving Bear Stearns hedge fund and asset backed securities investments. The settlement agreement, EFTA00597963, identifies Financial Trust, C.O.U.Q., and Jeffrey Epstein collectively as claimants. It resolved the arbitration and related federal litigation for a combined $9.2 million without admission of liability, followed by dismissal with prejudiceA

A reported arbitration concerned Epstein’s attempted redemption from the D.B. Zwirn Special Opportunities Fund after Fortress Investment Group acquired assets associated with the fund. A verified forum, caption, case number, filing, and result have not been located. It therefore remains in the unresolved section rather than being presented as a verified proceeding.


Georgia and other pro se filings

FiledCaseDocketSubject and statusGrade
2021JEGE, LLC and Thomas Huff v. Indyke and KahnN.D. Ga. 1:21-cv-04367The buyer of Epstein’s aviation business alleged fraud and breach involving undisclosed reputational risksB
2025Williams v. Roc Nation et al.N.D. Ga. 1:25-cv-03718Pro se RICO style complaint naming Epstein; no merits findingsB
2019Demos v. Epstein et al.E.D. Va. 3:19-cv-00643; Fourth Circuit 19-7599Prisoner pro se civil rights filing; dismissed on fee and procedural groundsB
2025Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al.W.D. Va. 5:25-cv-00140Papers mention the Estate and Maxwell, but the public caption does not conclusively establish the Estate as a defendant; verification queue onlyC

Criminal, sex offender, and investigative court proceedings

These are court proceedings, not civil lawsuits. They are not counted as civil actions.

FiledProceedingDocketStatusGrade
2006State of Florida v. Epstein50-2006-CF-009454Original state prosecutionA
2006Palm Beach investigative and grand jury file06-cf-945AXXXMBJudicial investigation fileA
2008State of Florida v. Epstein50-2008-CF-009381Plea and convictionA
2010People v. EpsteinNew York County 30129/2010; First Department 6081Sex Offender Registration Act risk level proceedingA
2019United States v. Jeffrey EpsteinS.D.N.Y. 1:19-cr-00490; Second Circuit 19-2221Federal prosecution dismissed following Epstein’s deathA

Formal nonparty participation in evidence rich cases

These were not lawsuits against an Epstein party, but Epstein or the Estate formally participated.

CaseDocketEpstein party role
Giuffre v. MaxwellS.D.N.Y. 1:15-cv-07433Epstein appeared as a nonparty discovery respondent and participant; litigation concerned solely with later unsealing is excluded
Doe 1 v. JPMorgan ChaseS.D.N.Y. 1:22-cv-10019The Estate was ordered to produce documents
Government of the V.I. v. JPMorgan ChaseS.D.N.Y. 1:22-cv-10904The Estate was a major discovery source
Doe v. Bank of AmericaS.D.N.Y. 1:25-cv-08520The Estate was subpoenaed
Doe v. Bank of New York MellonS.D.N.Y. 1:25-cv-08525The Estate was subpoenaed

Related cases not included in the direct party inventory

CaseDocketResearch value
Giuffre v. DershowitzS.D.N.Y. 1:19-cv-03377Discovery and credibility disputes
Giuffre v. Prince AndrewS.D.N.Y. 1:21-cv-06702Trafficking allegations and settlement
Doe 1 v. Deutsche BankS.D.N.Y. 1:22-cv-10018Banking, monitoring, account, and entity evidence
Araoz v. New Albany OwnersS.D.N.Y. 1:22-cv-00125Alleged abuse location premises claims
Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the U.S.V.I.S.D.N.Y. 1:23-cv-10301Territorial official, employee, payment, and entity evidence
Farmer v. United StatesD.D.C. 1:25-cv-01709Alleged law enforcement failures; no Epstein party defendant

France

No verified French civil or commercial proceeding naming Epstein, the Estate, the 1953 Trust, or SCI JEP as a party was located.

French investigations involving Epstein and people associated with him were criminal investigations, not civil lawsuits against Epstein. In August 2026, plaintiffs sued the French state over alleged delays. Those suits do not name Epstein, his estate, his trusts, or one of his companies as a party and therefore fall outside this direct inventory.

Documented but unresolved references

MatterKnownMissing
Epstein v. Herbert GlassReported Palm Beach claim for $13,444 involving furnishingsDocket and case file
Municipal Art Society disputeReported settled New York rent disputeCaption, court, and docket
Dickerson & Reily disputeReported settled attorney fee matter tied to work involving LimitlessCaption, court, and docket
Williamson v. EpsteinAppellate opinion and result verifiedTrial court index number
Cypress grazing petitionFiling and withdrawal officially confirmedNew Mexico docket
Minnesota action filed January 22, 2020Estate Schedule G identifies the 1953 Trust, the Estate, and Mark Epstein as defendantsPlaintiff name, exact court, and docket
Reported D.B. Zwirn and Fortress arbitrationSecondary reporting describes a redemption dispute involving EpsteinForum, caption, case number, filing, and result
“Jane Doe 1001” action announced August 26, 2020Reporting described an Estate and Groff lawsuit brought by an aspiring singer and modelExact docket and possible pseudonym duplication

The older reported disputes appear in contemporary sources including Vanity Fair’s 2003 Epstein profile. They remain Grade C until the underlying archival records are obtained.


Same name and duplicate exclusions

  • E.D.N.Y. 1:92-mj-02283, 1:93-mj-00073, and 1:93-cr-00193 concern a different criminal defendant.
  • Kelleher v. ADVO, D. Conn. 3:06-cv-01422, is an employment case unrelated to Jeffrey Edward Epstein.
  • Irving H. Picard v. Kahn, S.D.N.Y. 1:12-cv-02620, identifies Jeffrey M. Epstein, not Jeffrey Edward Epstein.
  • Rapaport v. Epstein, S.D.N.Y. 1:24-cv-07439, has not been verified as involving Jeffrey Edward Epstein.
  • DiMaggio et al. v. 3M, S.D.N.Y. 1:25-cv-09352 and D.S.C. 2:26-cv-00083, involves an unrelated plaintiff.
  • Highland Crusader v. TerreStar references a different Jeffrey Epstein associated with TerreStar.
  • United States v. Metro Dade County, S.D. Fla. 1:93-cv-01109, lists a movant named Jeffrey Epstein, but the movant’s identity has not been verified as Jeffrey Edward Epstein.
  • S.D. Fla. 9:10-cv-81107 through 9:10-cv-81110 and 9:26-cv-80069 and 9:26-cv-80074 are filing shells or abandoned electronic entries, not separate substantive lawsuits.

Entity names included in the audit

Estate and trusts: Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein; The 1953 Trust; 2007 Jeffrey E. Epstein Insurance Trust; Haze Trust; Butterfly Trust.

Financial and administrative entities: Financial Trust Company; Financial Informatics; Southern Trust Company; Southern Financial; Southern Country International; Financial Ballistics; HBRK Associates; NES; IGO Company; Jeepers; FSF; FT Real Estate.

Property entities: Nine East 71st Street Corporation; Cypress; Laurel; Maple; Nautilus; Great St. Jim; Little St. Jim; L.S.J.; LSJE; Zorro Management; SCI JEP.

Aircraft and transportation entities: JEGE; Hyperion Air; Plan D; Poplar; Freedom Air International; Air Ghislaine; Thomas World Air; Michelle’s Transportation.

Foundations: Florida Science Foundation; Epstein Foundation; J. Epstein Foundation; J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation; Gratitude America; C.O.U.Q. Foundation; Enhanced Education.

Research cautions

A complaint records allegations, not judicial findings. A dismissal may result from settlement, statutes of limitations, service failures, jurisdiction, standing, releases, or other procedural reasons. Settlements generally do not constitute admissions of liability.

Pseudonyms create both false matches and false duplicates. Researchers should compare counsel, filing dates, alleged locations, factual allegations, amended complaints, dismissals, and settlement papers before deciding whether two records represent the same claimant or lawsuit.

A state filing, federal removal, remand, and appellate proceeding ordinarily remain stages of a single claim lineage. They should not automatically be counted as separate lawsuits.

Entity ownership must be evaluated as of the relevant date. Some Epstein associated companies changed names, transferred assets, were dissolved, or were sold. The description “Epstein associated” does not necessarily mean Epstein owned or controlled that entity at the time of a later lawsuit.


Highest value investigative leads

  • Financial Trust and Citibank litigation contains evidence involving banking relationships, loans, investments, promissory notes, and financial representations.
  • Financial Trust and Bear Stearns litigation contains Epstein’s claimed communications with senior Bear Stearns executives, his asserted investment decision making, his stock transactions, and allegations concerning Bear Stearns’ liquidity and mortgage backed assets.
  • Williamson documents Epstein’s role as trustee of Institutional Interests in litigation involving Lipper Convertibles and hedge fund distributions.
  • Carver Cross contains information involving Radar Media, transfers, corporate succession, and Epstein’s role in a media company.
  • The Rothstein and Edwards litigation contains evidence involving legal strategy, the nonprosecution agreement, survivor litigation, and alleged efforts to discredit survivor counsel.
  • The Palm Beach survivor dockets contain contemporaneous correspondence and discovery materials predating Epstein’s 2019 arrest.
  • The Cypress litigation may contain information about Zorro Ranch boundaries, grazing leases, agents, property use, and communications with New Mexico officials.
  • Crown Bay Marina and the Fancelli and Molyneux disputes contain evidence involving vendors, contractors, vessels, transportation, and construction work connected to Epstein’s islands.
  • The JEGE Georgia litigation concerns the sale and valuation of Epstein’s aviation business shortly before his 2019 arrest.
  • Virgin Islands cases ST-19-PB-80 and ST-20-CV-14 contain extensive information involving assets, companies, corporate officers, property transfers, creditor claims, liens, tax benefits, and estate administration.
  • FINRA arbitration 09-00979 and the related Bear Stearns settlement contain information involving Financial Trust, the C.O.U.Q. Foundation, Epstein’s investment positions, Bear Stearns funds, Warren Spector, and the combined $9.2 million settlement.
  • The unresolved Minnesota lawsuit is significant because the Estate’s own accounting confirms that the 1953 Trust, the Estate, and Mark Epstein were named as defendants. Locating its plaintiff and docket should remain a priority.
Previous EFTA01248577: A Former Maxwell Employee’s FBI Interview About Epstein, Sexual Coercion, and Life Inside the Network
Next Zorro Ranch in New Mexico: Court Cases, Investigations, Land Disputes, and Other Legal Proceedings
Table of Contents